Precision medicine approach to detect obese people who are at high risk of developing diabetes

Iskandar Idris DM
{"title":"Precision medicine approach to detect obese people who are at high risk of developing diabetes","authors":"Iskandar Idris DM","doi":"10.1002/doi2.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is well-recognized that obesity predisposes an individual to an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes. However, a variety of factors can play a role in the risk of developing type 32 diabetes. Various strategies have been utilized to help identify obese individuals who are at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes so as appropriate intervention can be prioritized to reduce the risks of developing obesity related complications. Precision medicine approach has attracted significant amount of clinical and research interests to help predict, prevent, diagnose and manage patients with a variety of conditions.</p><p>Stratification of Obesity Phenotypes to Optimise Future Obesity Therapy (SOPHIA) is a European Union-funded innovative medicine initiative (IMI) to help develop tests and therapies which may allow the prediction of risk of obesity related co-morbidities and the prediction of response to obesity treatments. A recent publication in the journal <i>Nature Medicine</i> from the IMI SOPHIA consortium have reported and described a new precision prediction algorithm that distinguish subpopulations where cardiometabolic risk differs from the risk expected for their given body mass index (BMI).<span><sup>1</sup></span> This is important because multiple factors are in play when determining an obese person's individual risk of developing type 2 diabetes and heart disease. For example, while BMI is the common metric used by epidemiologists, health professionals and others to characterize obesity, it is insufficient for accurate classification of the disease of obesity at an individual level because people with similar BMIs often exhibit different health risks. This is partially because BMI is an imperfect measure of excess adiposity as it does not distinguish the proportion or distribution of fat mass and fat-free mass in the body.</p><p>The research was led by scientists at Lund University Diabetes Centre in Sweden, and Maastricht Centre for Systems Biology and Erasmus MC University Medical Centre in The Netherlands, in collaboration with other researchers from the IMI SOPHIA consortium. The study focused on clinical data of 170 000 adults derived from the UK Biobank, The Rotterdam Study, the Maastricht study and the Gutenberg Health study. Machine learning was then utilized to develop algorithm that would split obesity into five subtypes based on different diagnostic profiles, each with different risks of developing obesity related complications. The five phenotypic profiles consists of individuals with cardiometabolic biomarkers higher or lower than expected based on their BMI, which generally increases disease risk, representing 20% of the total population. Conversely, the study showed that 80% of people had health markers that matched their cardiometabolic risk expected for their BMI. The discordant phenotype identified for example 8% of women with higher blood pressure than expected for their weight but associated with higher protective HDL and lower waist-hip-ratio (WHR). In addition, 5% had abnormal liver enzymes and high WHR for their BMI; 4% had higher level of inflammatory markers than expected for their BMI and approximately 2.5% had higher blood sugar and lower LDL for their BMI. Furthermore, around 5% and 7% of women and men respectively had higher LDL cholesterol, triglyceride, WHR and blood pressure for their BMI. The enhanced algorithm derived from this study was reported to represents an additional net benefit of 4–15 additional correct interventions and 37–135 additional unnecessary interventions correctly avoided for every 10 000 individuals tested. The study provided evidence of the important role of precision medicine to more accurately identify cardio-metabolic risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":100370,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Now","volume":"2 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/doi2.70007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Now","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/doi2.70007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is well-recognized that obesity predisposes an individual to an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes. However, a variety of factors can play a role in the risk of developing type 32 diabetes. Various strategies have been utilized to help identify obese individuals who are at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes so as appropriate intervention can be prioritized to reduce the risks of developing obesity related complications. Precision medicine approach has attracted significant amount of clinical and research interests to help predict, prevent, diagnose and manage patients with a variety of conditions.

Stratification of Obesity Phenotypes to Optimise Future Obesity Therapy (SOPHIA) is a European Union-funded innovative medicine initiative (IMI) to help develop tests and therapies which may allow the prediction of risk of obesity related co-morbidities and the prediction of response to obesity treatments. A recent publication in the journal Nature Medicine from the IMI SOPHIA consortium have reported and described a new precision prediction algorithm that distinguish subpopulations where cardiometabolic risk differs from the risk expected for their given body mass index (BMI).1 This is important because multiple factors are in play when determining an obese person's individual risk of developing type 2 diabetes and heart disease. For example, while BMI is the common metric used by epidemiologists, health professionals and others to characterize obesity, it is insufficient for accurate classification of the disease of obesity at an individual level because people with similar BMIs often exhibit different health risks. This is partially because BMI is an imperfect measure of excess adiposity as it does not distinguish the proportion or distribution of fat mass and fat-free mass in the body.

The research was led by scientists at Lund University Diabetes Centre in Sweden, and Maastricht Centre for Systems Biology and Erasmus MC University Medical Centre in The Netherlands, in collaboration with other researchers from the IMI SOPHIA consortium. The study focused on clinical data of 170 000 adults derived from the UK Biobank, The Rotterdam Study, the Maastricht study and the Gutenberg Health study. Machine learning was then utilized to develop algorithm that would split obesity into five subtypes based on different diagnostic profiles, each with different risks of developing obesity related complications. The five phenotypic profiles consists of individuals with cardiometabolic biomarkers higher or lower than expected based on their BMI, which generally increases disease risk, representing 20% of the total population. Conversely, the study showed that 80% of people had health markers that matched their cardiometabolic risk expected for their BMI. The discordant phenotype identified for example 8% of women with higher blood pressure than expected for their weight but associated with higher protective HDL and lower waist-hip-ratio (WHR). In addition, 5% had abnormal liver enzymes and high WHR for their BMI; 4% had higher level of inflammatory markers than expected for their BMI and approximately 2.5% had higher blood sugar and lower LDL for their BMI. Furthermore, around 5% and 7% of women and men respectively had higher LDL cholesterol, triglyceride, WHR and blood pressure for their BMI. The enhanced algorithm derived from this study was reported to represents an additional net benefit of 4–15 additional correct interventions and 37–135 additional unnecessary interventions correctly avoided for every 10 000 individuals tested. The study provided evidence of the important role of precision medicine to more accurately identify cardio-metabolic risks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用精准医学方法检测糖尿病高危肥胖人群
众所周知,肥胖会增加个人罹患 2 型糖尿病的风险。然而,有多种因素会对罹患 32 型糖尿病的风险产生影响。人们已利用各种策略来帮助识别罹患 2 型糖尿病高风险的肥胖者,以便优先采取适当的干预措施,降低罹患肥胖相关并发症的风险。肥胖表型分层以优化未来肥胖治疗(SOPHIA)是一项由欧盟资助的创新医学计划(IMI),旨在帮助开发可预测肥胖相关并发症风险和预测肥胖治疗反应的测试和疗法。IMI SOPHIA 联盟最近在《自然医学》(Nature Medicine)杂志上发表了一篇文章,报告并描述了一种新的精确预测算法,该算法可区分心脏代谢风险与特定体重指数(BMI)预期风险不同的亚人群1。例如,虽然体重指数是流行病学家、卫生专业人员和其他人用来描述肥胖特征的通用指标,但它不足以在个人层面对肥胖疾病进行准确分类,因为体重指数相似的人往往表现出不同的健康风险。这项研究由瑞典隆德大学糖尿病中心、马斯特里赫特系统生物学中心和荷兰伊拉斯姆斯MC大学医学中心的科学家领导,IMI SOPHIA联盟的其他研究人员共同参与。研究的重点是英国生物库、鹿特丹研究、马斯特里赫特研究和古腾堡健康研究中17万成年人的临床数据。然后利用机器学习开发算法,根据不同的诊断特征将肥胖症分为五种亚型,每种亚型患肥胖症相关并发症的风险不同。这五种表型特征包括心脏代谢生物标志物高于或低于基于体重指数的预期值的个体,这通常会增加疾病风险,占总人口的 20%。相反,研究显示,80% 的人的健康标志物与其体重指数预期的心脏代谢风险相符。例如,不和谐表型发现,8%的女性血压高于其体重的预期值,但与较高的保护性高密度脂蛋白和较低的腰臀比(WHR)有关。此外,5% 的妇女肝酶异常,其体重指数(BMI)的腰臀比(WHR)较高;4% 的妇女炎症指标高于其体重指数(BMI)的预期水平;约 2.5%的妇女血糖较高,其体重指数(BMI)的低密度脂蛋白(LDL)较低。此外,分别约有 5%和 7%的女性和男性的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、甘油三酯、WHR 和血压高于其体重指数。据报道,从这项研究中得出的增强算法代表了一种额外的净效益,即每 10000 名接受测试的人中,正确干预的人数会增加 4-15 人,正确避免不必要干预的人数会增加 37-135 人。这项研究证明了精准医疗在更准确地识别心血管代谢风险方面的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Precision medicine approach to detect obese people who are at high risk of developing diabetes Increasing excess to weight loss injection shown to save thousands of lives a year Semaglutide shown to improve cardiovascular outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes with any forms of heart failure Real world study provided reassurance of the safety of GLP-1 therapy on mental health and suicide risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1