Restructuring endometriosis care

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1136/bmj.q2416
Prathiba M De Silva, Sharon Dixon, Ginisha Vekaria
{"title":"Restructuring endometriosis care","authors":"Prathiba M De Silva, Sharon Dixon, Ginisha Vekaria","doi":"10.1136/bmj.q2416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Women need better coordination between primary and secondary care Endometriosis affects as many as 10% of women of reproductive age, or 190 million women globally.1 It can cause debilitating chronic pelvic pain and infertility, with treatment, work loss, and healthcare estimated to cost £12.5bn annually in the UK alone.2 The 2024 National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) report audited the care provided to 941 patients with surgically confirmed endometriosis and included the review of data from 120 general practitioners (GPs) and 623 specialists, alongside organisational data from 167 hospitals.3 The report highlights examples of effective, timely, holistic, and patient centred care across all settings but also reminds us that we could and should do better for many women with endometriosis, throughout their care journey. Specific challenges discussed include the long timeframe to and difficulties in diagnosing and treating endometriosis, the lack of coordination between primary and secondary care, and the difficulty in accessing supportive services. No clinical findings specifically correlate with a diagnosis of endometriosis, so GPs must often consider other conditions that have similar presenting symptoms. This may …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women need better coordination between primary and secondary care Endometriosis affects as many as 10% of women of reproductive age, or 190 million women globally.1 It can cause debilitating chronic pelvic pain and infertility, with treatment, work loss, and healthcare estimated to cost £12.5bn annually in the UK alone.2 The 2024 National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) report audited the care provided to 941 patients with surgically confirmed endometriosis and included the review of data from 120 general practitioners (GPs) and 623 specialists, alongside organisational data from 167 hospitals.3 The report highlights examples of effective, timely, holistic, and patient centred care across all settings but also reminds us that we could and should do better for many women with endometriosis, throughout their care journey. Specific challenges discussed include the long timeframe to and difficulties in diagnosing and treating endometriosis, the lack of coordination between primary and secondary care, and the difficulty in accessing supportive services. No clinical findings specifically correlate with a diagnosis of endometriosis, so GPs must often consider other conditions that have similar presenting symptoms. This may …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重组子宫内膜异位症护理
妇女需要更好地协调初级和中级医疗 子宫内膜异位症影响着多达 10%的育龄妇女,即全球 1.9 亿妇女。1 子宫内膜异位症可导致慢性盆腔疼痛和不孕症,使人衰弱,据估计,仅在英国,每年的治疗、工作损失和医疗费用就高达 125 亿英镑。2024 年全国患者结果与死亡保密调查(NCEPOD)报告对 941 名经手术确诊的子宫内膜异位症患者所接受的治疗进行了审计,包括对来自 120 名全科医生(GP)和 623 名专科医生的数据以及来自 167 家医院的组织数据进行审查。所讨论的具体挑战包括:诊断和治疗子宫内膜异位症的时间过长和困难、初级和二级护理之间缺乏协调,以及难以获得支持性服务。没有任何临床发现与子宫内膜异位症的诊断具体相关,因此全科医生必须经常考虑具有类似症状的其他疾病。这可能 ...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reaffirming our commitment to the NHS is needed now more than ever Life and ​d​​eath: far too important to miss out on Premier League football should tackle high risk gambling and trading sponsorship Gilead’s anti-diversion clause for lenacapavir exploits vulnerable communities Designing healthcare spaces for learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1