Which Messages Motivate Tax Compliance in Low Administrative Capacity Settings? Experimental Evidence From Two Mozambican Municipalities

IF 2.7 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Journal of Public Affairs Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1002/pa.2960
Armin von Schiller
{"title":"Which Messages Motivate Tax Compliance in Low Administrative Capacity Settings? Experimental Evidence From Two Mozambican Municipalities","authors":"Armin von Schiller","doi":"10.1002/pa.2960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past two decades, tax nudging has gained popularity as a method to boost tax compliance and help revenue authorities increase tax collection. However, most evidence on the effect of behaviourally informed tax letters comes from environments with high administrative capacity, which raises doubts about its generalizability. Against this background, this article tests the compliance effect of including messages that trigger deterrence or reciprocity beliefs in tax letters through a randomized controlled trial implemented in two mid-sized Mozambican municipalities, Vilankulo and Dondo. Conducted in 2018, the experiment focuses on property taxation, a tax overwhelmingly perceived to perform well below its potential in many low- and middle-income countries. The analysis relies on administrative data and exploits the complete universe of registered property tax taxpayers, including individuals and enterprises. The results indicate that (i) receiving a notification letter – not necessarily common practice in many contexts – has a significant positive impact on compliance; (ii) among enterprises, the message alluding to reciprocity backfires, while the most effective message to include generally is the one alluding to deterrence; and (iii) previously compliant taxpayers react negatively to the letter, regardless of the message included. These results carry relevant policy implications, indicating the large scope for behaviourally informed letters to help increase tax compliance, even in low administrative capacity settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Affairs","volume":"24 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/pa.2960","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pa.2960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past two decades, tax nudging has gained popularity as a method to boost tax compliance and help revenue authorities increase tax collection. However, most evidence on the effect of behaviourally informed tax letters comes from environments with high administrative capacity, which raises doubts about its generalizability. Against this background, this article tests the compliance effect of including messages that trigger deterrence or reciprocity beliefs in tax letters through a randomized controlled trial implemented in two mid-sized Mozambican municipalities, Vilankulo and Dondo. Conducted in 2018, the experiment focuses on property taxation, a tax overwhelmingly perceived to perform well below its potential in many low- and middle-income countries. The analysis relies on administrative data and exploits the complete universe of registered property tax taxpayers, including individuals and enterprises. The results indicate that (i) receiving a notification letter – not necessarily common practice in many contexts – has a significant positive impact on compliance; (ii) among enterprises, the message alluding to reciprocity backfires, while the most effective message to include generally is the one alluding to deterrence; and (iii) previously compliant taxpayers react negatively to the letter, regardless of the message included. These results carry relevant policy implications, indicating the large scope for behaviourally informed letters to help increase tax compliance, even in low administrative capacity settings.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在行政能力较低的环境中,哪些信息会促使人们遵守税法?莫桑比克两个城市的实验证据
在过去二十年里,税收劝导作为一种提高纳税遵从度、帮助税务机关增加税收的方法,受到了越来越多人的青睐。然而,有关行为信息税务信件效果的大多数证据都来自行政管理能力较高的环境,这让人对其普适性产生怀疑。在此背景下,本文通过在莫桑比克两个中等城市维兰库洛(Vilankulo)和栋多(Dondo)实施的随机对照试验,检验了在税务信函中加入引发威慑或互惠信念的信息的遵从效果。该试验于 2018 年进行,重点关注财产税,在许多中低收入国家,人们普遍认为财产税的表现远远低于其潜力。分析依赖于行政数据,并利用了包括个人和企业在内的全部财产税登记纳税人。结果表明:(i) 收到通知函--在许多情况下不一定是常见做法--对遵从税法有显著的积极影响;(ii) 在企业中,暗示互惠的信息会适得其反,而最有效的信息一般是暗示威慑的信息;(iii) 无论包含何种信息,以前遵从税法的纳税人对通知函的反应都是负面的。这些结果具有相关的政策含义,表明即使在行政管理能力较低的情况下,行为知情信函也有很大的空间来帮助提高纳税遵从度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Affairs
Journal of Public Affairs PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Affairs provides an international forum for refereed papers, case studies and reviews on the latest developments, practice and thinking in government relations, public affairs, and political marketing. The Journal is guided by the twin objectives of publishing submissions of the utmost relevance to the day-to-day practice of communication specialists, and promoting the highest standards of intellectual rigour.
期刊最新文献
Which Messages Motivate Tax Compliance in Low Administrative Capacity Settings? Experimental Evidence From Two Mozambican Municipalities Can Catering to Local Area Needs Through CSR Reduce Firm Risk? Exploring the Impact of Environmental Degradation, Income Inequality, Technological Development and Food Availability on Quality of Life: Recent Evidence From South Asia What Determines Public Funding for Elementary Education in India? Evidence From Before and After a Policy Change An Analysis of Contextual Factors Influencing women's Candidacy in Local Elections: Insights From Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1