Editorial: Updated COVID-19 Boosters—Tailoring Protection for Patients With IBD. Authors' Reply

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1111/apt.18401
Simon Woelfel, Stephan Brand
{"title":"Editorial: Updated COVID-19 Boosters—Tailoring Protection for Patients With IBD. Authors' Reply","authors":"Simon Woelfel,&nbsp;Stephan Brand","doi":"10.1111/apt.18401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We thank Drs. Alexander and Caldera for their stimulating and compelling editorial that excellently contextualised our study evaluating the immunogenicity of original and variant-adapted COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and healthy controls [<span>1, 2</span>].</p><p>To date, the STAR SIGN study has evaluated immunity against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and the omicron BA.1, BA5, BQ.1.1, XBB.1.5 and the JN.1 variants in a cohort of healthy individuals and patients with IBD (Figure 1) [<span>1, 3-5</span>]. Three doses of original mRNA vaccines induced robust neutralisation against wild-type SARS-CoV-2, but the tested omicron lineages displayed an increasing level of resistance against vaccine-induced neutralising.</p><p>Vaccine adaptation is an effective strategy to boost variant-specific immunity [<span>6</span>]. However, the currently recommended vaccines targeting the JN.1 and KP.2 variants are already the third generation of variant-adapted COVID-19 vaccines. Throughout the last years, variant-adapted vaccines were unable to prevent COVID-19 surges with millions of infections worldwide. The rise of the JN.1 variant shortly after the start of XBB.1.5 vaccine roll-out has shown that immunity elicited by variant-adapted vaccines—while efficient against the targeted variant—is not immune to being evaded. In our current study, vaccines encoding the spike protein of the XBB.1.5 variant failed to induce JN.1 neutralisation in 44% of patients with IBD, highlighting the need to develop strategies to induce escape-resistant immune responses. This might be achieved by enhancing the breadth of systemic antibodies to enhance their cross-reactivity with emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Previous immunisations with original vaccines may impair the immunogenicity of XBB.1.5-adapted COVID-19 mRNA vaccines via immune imprinting, which might partially explain the success of the JN.1 variant [<span>7</span>]. However, repeated vaccination with adapted COVID-19 vaccines may override original vaccine-mediated immune imprinting and drive the expansion of antibodies that cross-neutralise emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants [<span>7, 8</span>]. These studies highlight an additional benefit of frequent booster immunisation with adapted vaccines for patients with IBD.</p><p>As the authors pointed out in the editorial, the conservative COVID-19 vaccination guidelines in many European countries have resulted in vaccine hesitancy. Many believe that frequent COVID-19 infections with circulating variants are an adequate and safe strategy to boost immunity against circulating variants which is a deceitful notion. The continuing threat of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 that increases with every SARS-CoV-2 infection mandates the maintenance of high immunoprotection. Ours and other studies have demonstrated that this requires frequent COVID-19 vaccination in patients with IBD, especially in those treated with anti-TNF agents [<span>1, 3, 4, 9, 10</span>]. It is the responsibility of gastroenterologists to emphasise the critical advantages of vaccines regarding both safety and efficacy to their patients and convince them to keep up to date with variant-adapted COVID-19 vaccines.</p><p><b>Simon Woelfel:</b> visualization, writing – review and editing, writing – original draft, data curation, conceptualization. <b>Stephan Brand:</b> writing – review and editing, supervision, resources, conceptualization, visualization.</p><p>This article is linked to Woelfel et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18349 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18379.</p>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"61 2","pages":"382-383"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.18401","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.18401","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We thank Drs. Alexander and Caldera for their stimulating and compelling editorial that excellently contextualised our study evaluating the immunogenicity of original and variant-adapted COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and healthy controls [1, 2].

To date, the STAR SIGN study has evaluated immunity against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and the omicron BA.1, BA5, BQ.1.1, XBB.1.5 and the JN.1 variants in a cohort of healthy individuals and patients with IBD (Figure 1) [1, 3-5]. Three doses of original mRNA vaccines induced robust neutralisation against wild-type SARS-CoV-2, but the tested omicron lineages displayed an increasing level of resistance against vaccine-induced neutralising.

Vaccine adaptation is an effective strategy to boost variant-specific immunity [6]. However, the currently recommended vaccines targeting the JN.1 and KP.2 variants are already the third generation of variant-adapted COVID-19 vaccines. Throughout the last years, variant-adapted vaccines were unable to prevent COVID-19 surges with millions of infections worldwide. The rise of the JN.1 variant shortly after the start of XBB.1.5 vaccine roll-out has shown that immunity elicited by variant-adapted vaccines—while efficient against the targeted variant—is not immune to being evaded. In our current study, vaccines encoding the spike protein of the XBB.1.5 variant failed to induce JN.1 neutralisation in 44% of patients with IBD, highlighting the need to develop strategies to induce escape-resistant immune responses. This might be achieved by enhancing the breadth of systemic antibodies to enhance their cross-reactivity with emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Previous immunisations with original vaccines may impair the immunogenicity of XBB.1.5-adapted COVID-19 mRNA vaccines via immune imprinting, which might partially explain the success of the JN.1 variant [7]. However, repeated vaccination with adapted COVID-19 vaccines may override original vaccine-mediated immune imprinting and drive the expansion of antibodies that cross-neutralise emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants [7, 8]. These studies highlight an additional benefit of frequent booster immunisation with adapted vaccines for patients with IBD.

As the authors pointed out in the editorial, the conservative COVID-19 vaccination guidelines in many European countries have resulted in vaccine hesitancy. Many believe that frequent COVID-19 infections with circulating variants are an adequate and safe strategy to boost immunity against circulating variants which is a deceitful notion. The continuing threat of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 that increases with every SARS-CoV-2 infection mandates the maintenance of high immunoprotection. Ours and other studies have demonstrated that this requires frequent COVID-19 vaccination in patients with IBD, especially in those treated with anti-TNF agents [1, 3, 4, 9, 10]. It is the responsibility of gastroenterologists to emphasise the critical advantages of vaccines regarding both safety and efficacy to their patients and convince them to keep up to date with variant-adapted COVID-19 vaccines.

Simon Woelfel: visualization, writing – review and editing, writing – original draft, data curation, conceptualization. Stephan Brand: writing – review and editing, supervision, resources, conceptualization, visualization.

This article is linked to Woelfel et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18349 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18379.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社论:更新的 COVID-19 增效剂--为 IBD 患者提供量身定制的保护。作者回复。
我们感谢dr。Alexander和Caldera发表了令人振奋和令人信服的社论,该社论很好地说明了我们在炎症性肠病(IBD)患者和健康对照组中评估原始和变异适应的COVID-19 mRNA疫苗的免疫原性的研究[1,2]。迄今为止,STAR SIGN研究已经在健康个体和IBD患者队列中评估了对野生型SARS-CoV-2和组粒BA.1、BA5、BQ.1.1、XBB.1.5和JN.1变体的免疫力(图1)[1,3 -5]。三剂原始mRNA疫苗诱导了对野生型SARS-CoV-2的强效中和,但测试的组粒谱系对疫苗诱导的中和表现出越来越高的抗性。疫苗适应是提高变异体特异性免疫的有效策略。然而,目前推荐的针对JN.1和KP.2变异体的疫苗已经是第三代适应变异体的COVID-19疫苗。在过去几年中,变异适应疫苗无法预防COVID-19激增,导致全球数百万人感染。在XBB.1.5疫苗开始推广后不久,JN.1变体的出现表明,变体适应疫苗引发的免疫力虽然对目标变体有效,但对被逃避并不免疫。在我们目前的研究中,编码XBB.1.5变体刺突蛋白的疫苗未能在44%的IBD患者中诱导JN.1中性化,这突出了开发诱导逃逸抵抗免疫反应的策略的必要性。这可以通过增强全身抗体的广度来增强其与新出现的SARS-CoV-2变体的交叉反应性来实现。先前使用原始疫苗的免疫可能通过免疫印迹损害xbb .1.5适应的COVID-19 mRNA疫苗的免疫原性,这可能部分解释了JN.1变体[7]的成功。然而,重复接种适应的COVID-19疫苗可能会覆盖原始疫苗介导的免疫印迹,并驱动交叉中和新出现的SARS-CoV-2变体的抗体扩增[7,8]。这些研究强调了对IBD患者使用适应疫苗进行频繁加强免疫的额外益处。正如作者在社论中指出的那样,许多欧洲国家保守的COVID-19疫苗接种指南导致了疫苗犹豫。许多人认为,频繁感染带有循环变体的COVID-19是一种充分和安全的策略,可以增强对循环变体的免疫力,这是一种欺骗性的概念。随着每次SARS-CoV-2感染,COVID-19急性后后遗症的威胁持续增加,这要求保持高度免疫保护。我们和其他研究表明,这需要IBD患者频繁接种COVID-19疫苗,特别是那些接受抗tnf药物治疗的患者[1,3,4,9,10]。胃肠病学家有责任强调疫苗对患者在安全性和有效性方面的关键优势,并说服他们及时使用适应变体的COVID-19疫苗。Simon Woelfel:可视化,写作-审查和编辑,写作-原始草稿,数据管理,概念化。斯蒂芬·布兰德:写作-审查和编辑,监督,资源,概念化,可视化。这篇文章链接到weelfel等人的论文。要查看这些文章,请访问https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18349和https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18379。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Trial: Long Versus Short Tapering of Steroids in Steroid Responsive Moderate to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis-A Randomised Controlled Trial. Letter: Statins for Cirrhosis: Are We Ready to Move From Cardiovascular Prophylaxis to Portal Pressure Management? Letter: Statins for Cirrhosis: Are we Ready to Move From Cardiovascular Prophylaxis to Portal Pressure Management? Authors' Reply. Letter: Association of Diabetes Mellitus With Post‐ TIPS Hepatic Encephalopathy in a Predominantly Viral Cirrhosis Cohort Letter: Association of Diabetes Mellitus With Post‐ TIPS Hepatic Encephalopathy in a Predominantly Viral Cirrhosis Cohort—Authors' Reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1