Comparison of polysaccharides from stem barks and flowers of Magnolia officinalis: Compositional characterization, hypoglycemic and photoprotection activities.
{"title":"Comparison of polysaccharides from stem barks and flowers of Magnolia officinalis: Compositional characterization, hypoglycemic and photoprotection activities.","authors":"Ke-Xin Hao, Rui-Fang Zhong, Jie Zhang, Chun-Yan Shen, Xi-Lin Xu, Jian-Guo Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.137766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The extraction of polysaccharides from stem barks and flowers of Magnolia officinalis were optimized using response surface methodology and the maximum yields were 4.12 ± 0.06 % and 5.5 ± 0.08 %, respectively. Three homogeneous polysaccharides including MOBP-I, MOBP-II and MOFP-I were further purified and their compositional characterization were compared. Molecular weights of MOBP-I, MOBP-II and MOFP-I were 5.9 × 10<sup>3</sup>, 6.8 × 10<sup>3</sup> and 3.9 × 10<sup>4</sup> Da, respectively. Gas chromatography (GC) analysis suggested that MOBP-I, MOBP-II and MOFP-I were composed of rhamnose, arabinose, mannose, glucose and galactose at different ratios and exhibited different appearance and glycosidic linkages. MOFP-I but not MOBP-I and MOBP-II had three helix structures. MOBP-I, MOBP-II and MOFP-I showed significant hypoglycemic and photoprotection capacities with different efficacy. MOBP-I had greater hypoglycemic activity, as evidenced by the increased α-glucosidase inhibition activity and glucose consumption in insulin-resistant HepG2 cells. MOBP-II and MOFP-I were more powerful in reversing ultraviolet-B (UVB)-irradiated photoaging of HaCaT cells. The difference of polysaccharides compositions might explain for their bioactivity discrepancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":333,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biological Macromolecules","volume":" ","pages":"137766"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biological Macromolecules","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.137766","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The extraction of polysaccharides from stem barks and flowers of Magnolia officinalis were optimized using response surface methodology and the maximum yields were 4.12 ± 0.06 % and 5.5 ± 0.08 %, respectively. Three homogeneous polysaccharides including MOBP-I, MOBP-II and MOFP-I were further purified and their compositional characterization were compared. Molecular weights of MOBP-I, MOBP-II and MOFP-I were 5.9 × 103, 6.8 × 103 and 3.9 × 104 Da, respectively. Gas chromatography (GC) analysis suggested that MOBP-I, MOBP-II and MOFP-I were composed of rhamnose, arabinose, mannose, glucose and galactose at different ratios and exhibited different appearance and glycosidic linkages. MOFP-I but not MOBP-I and MOBP-II had three helix structures. MOBP-I, MOBP-II and MOFP-I showed significant hypoglycemic and photoprotection capacities with different efficacy. MOBP-I had greater hypoglycemic activity, as evidenced by the increased α-glucosidase inhibition activity and glucose consumption in insulin-resistant HepG2 cells. MOBP-II and MOFP-I were more powerful in reversing ultraviolet-B (UVB)-irradiated photoaging of HaCaT cells. The difference of polysaccharides compositions might explain for their bioactivity discrepancy.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Biological Macromolecules is a well-established international journal dedicated to research on the chemical and biological aspects of natural macromolecules. Focusing on proteins, macromolecular carbohydrates, glycoproteins, proteoglycans, lignins, biological poly-acids, and nucleic acids, the journal presents the latest findings in molecular structure, properties, biological activities, interactions, modifications, and functional properties. Papers must offer new and novel insights, encompassing related model systems, structural conformational studies, theoretical developments, and analytical techniques. Each paper is required to primarily focus on at least one named biological macromolecule, reflected in the title, abstract, and text.