Parental alcohol use and the level of child protection response in Australia (2012-21).

IF 5.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Addiction Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1111/add.16677
Koen Smit, Jade Rintala, Benjamin Riordan, Kylie Lee, Anne-Marie Laslett
{"title":"Parental alcohol use and the level of child protection response in Australia (2012-21).","authors":"Koen Smit, Jade Rintala, Benjamin Riordan, Kylie Lee, Anne-Marie Laslett","doi":"10.1111/add.16677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To measure the association of harmful alcohol use by parents and primary caregivers with the level of child protection response.</p><p><strong>Design, setting and participants: </strong>This study was a multivariable logistic regression analysis using data drawn from the Victorian child protection database (2012-21) in Victoria, Australia. Focusing upon the most recent case per child, we analysed whether harmful parental alcohol use was probably associated with children's progression throughout the child protection system (from investigation phase, to substantiation, through to protective intervention, protection application and protection orders), while adjusting for socio-demographic variables. The participants comprised 352 800 children [48.5% female, 50.0% male, 1.6% other/unknown; mean age = 8.1 (0-18 years)] with one or more reports (mean = 1.4) in the child protection system.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Child protection workers reported on two risk factor variables indicating parental alcohol use during an intake risk assessment: 'alcohol abuse' and 'alcohol use compromises child's safety'.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of the 95 592 child cases investigated between 2012 and 2021, 50 476 were substantiated. Probable parental alcohol use was reported as a risk factor in 5.1% of children investigated and substantiated in 9.1% of children. The odds of progressing to investigation [odds ratio (OR) = 1.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.59, 1.69, P < 0.001], substantiation (OR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.91, 2.13, P < 0.001), protective intervention (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.23, 1.59, P < 0.001), protection application (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.08, 1.25, P < 0.001) and protection order (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.34, P = 0.028) were statistically significantly higher for children experiencing probable parental harmful alcohol use. However, the associations for protection application and protection order were not statistically significant after accounting for variables related to family accommodation, income and composition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Victoria, Australia, in cases where child protection workers document parental alcohol use, those children are more likely to progress through the Victorian child protection system than children whose parents have no documented alcohol use.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16677","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To measure the association of harmful alcohol use by parents and primary caregivers with the level of child protection response.

Design, setting and participants: This study was a multivariable logistic regression analysis using data drawn from the Victorian child protection database (2012-21) in Victoria, Australia. Focusing upon the most recent case per child, we analysed whether harmful parental alcohol use was probably associated with children's progression throughout the child protection system (from investigation phase, to substantiation, through to protective intervention, protection application and protection orders), while adjusting for socio-demographic variables. The participants comprised 352 800 children [48.5% female, 50.0% male, 1.6% other/unknown; mean age = 8.1 (0-18 years)] with one or more reports (mean = 1.4) in the child protection system.

Measurements: Child protection workers reported on two risk factor variables indicating parental alcohol use during an intake risk assessment: 'alcohol abuse' and 'alcohol use compromises child's safety'.

Findings: Of the 95 592 child cases investigated between 2012 and 2021, 50 476 were substantiated. Probable parental alcohol use was reported as a risk factor in 5.1% of children investigated and substantiated in 9.1% of children. The odds of progressing to investigation [odds ratio (OR) = 1.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.59, 1.69, P < 0.001], substantiation (OR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.91, 2.13, P < 0.001), protective intervention (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.23, 1.59, P < 0.001), protection application (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.08, 1.25, P < 0.001) and protection order (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.34, P = 0.028) were statistically significantly higher for children experiencing probable parental harmful alcohol use. However, the associations for protection application and protection order were not statistically significant after accounting for variables related to family accommodation, income and composition.

Conclusions: In Victoria, Australia, in cases where child protection workers document parental alcohol use, those children are more likely to progress through the Victorian child protection system than children whose parents have no documented alcohol use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚父母酗酒与儿童保护响应水平(2012-21 年)。
目的:测量父母和主要照顾者使用有害酒精与儿童保护响应水平之间的关联:本研究使用澳大利亚维多利亚州儿童保护数据库(2012-21 年)中的数据进行多变量逻辑回归分析。我们以每个儿童的最新案例为重点,分析了父母酗酒是否可能与儿童在整个儿童保护系统中的进展(从调查阶段到证实,再到保护性干预、保护申请和保护令)有关,同时对社会人口变量进行了调整。参与者包括 352 800 名儿童(48.5% 女性,50.0% 男性,1.6% 其他/未知;平均年龄 = 8.1(0-18 岁)),这些儿童在儿童保护系统中有过一次或多次报告(平均 = 1.4):测量方法:儿童保护工作者在接受风险评估时报告两个表明父母酗酒的风险因素变量:"酗酒 "和 "酗酒危及儿童安全":在 2012 年至 2021 年期间调查的 95 592 起儿童案件中,50 476 起得到证实。据报告,5.1%的被调查儿童的父母可能酗酒,9.1%的被调查儿童的父母酗酒情况属实。进入调查阶段的几率[几率比(OR)=1.64,95%置信区间(CI)=1.59,1.69,P 结论:[1.64] = 1.59,1.69,P 结论:[1.59] = 1.69:在澳大利亚维多利亚州,如果儿童保护工作者记录了父母酗酒的情况,与父母没有酗酒记录的儿童相比,这些儿童更有可能通过维多利亚州儿童保护系统接受调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Effect of a peer-led emergency department behavioral intervention on non-fatal opioid overdose: 18-month outcome in the Navigator randomized controlled trial. Client preferences for the design and delivery of injectable opioid agonist treatment services: Results from a best-worst scaling task. School-based interventions targeting substance use among young people in low-and-middle-income countries: A scoping review. The relationship between cannabis and nicotine use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. What is the prevalence of anabolic-androgenic steroid use among women? A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1