Background and aims: Workplaces offer a practical setting for alcohol and other drug interventions, especially in industries where impairment introduces substantial risk. Screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment has demonstrated effectiveness in health care settings and shows promise in workplace settings. However, low participation and high attrition in previous workplace studies indicate a need for deeper understanding of feasibility and acceptability. This exploratory qualitative study aimed to identify likely determinants for implementing alcohol and other drug screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment in two safety-sensitive industries in Australia.
Methods: Qualitative research design based on semi-structured online interviews, focussed on the construction and manufacturing industries. Participants included 23 professionals working in health and safety roles representing 21 organisations located across six Australian jurisdictions. Interview transcripts were coded against the five domains of the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Findings: Sixteen determinants were identified that were expected to act as barriers (n = 10) or enablers (n = 5) or have bidirectional impacts (n = 1) on the implementation of screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment in construction and manufacturing. Enabling factors included freely available tools, flexible delivery methods and delivery by trusted, external, peer-based organisations. Pervasive barriers included workers' mistrust of management, concerns about confidentiality and fear of consequences for disclosing substance use.
Conclusions: Successful workplace implementation of screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment appears to depend on organisational cultures where workers trust management, are assured of confidentiality and are not afraid of retribution for disclosure.
{"title":"Considering alcohol and other drug screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment in two safety-sensitive industries in Australia: An exploratory qualitative study.","authors":"Kirrilly Thompson, Tina Hart, Jacqueline Bowden","doi":"10.1111/add.70348","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70348","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Workplaces offer a practical setting for alcohol and other drug interventions, especially in industries where impairment introduces substantial risk. Screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment has demonstrated effectiveness in health care settings and shows promise in workplace settings. However, low participation and high attrition in previous workplace studies indicate a need for deeper understanding of feasibility and acceptability. This exploratory qualitative study aimed to identify likely determinants for implementing alcohol and other drug screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment in two safety-sensitive industries in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative research design based on semi-structured online interviews, focussed on the construction and manufacturing industries. Participants included 23 professionals working in health and safety roles representing 21 organisations located across six Australian jurisdictions. Interview transcripts were coded against the five domains of the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Sixteen determinants were identified that were expected to act as barriers (n = 10) or enablers (n = 5) or have bidirectional impacts (n = 1) on the implementation of screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment in construction and manufacturing. Enabling factors included freely available tools, flexible delivery methods and delivery by trusted, external, peer-based organisations. Pervasive barriers included workers' mistrust of management, concerns about confidentiality and fear of consequences for disclosing substance use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful workplace implementation of screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment appears to depend on organisational cultures where workers trust management, are assured of confidentiality and are not afraid of retribution for disclosure.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146130510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Commentary on Lim et al.: Real-world e-cigarette use under prescription-only regulation.","authors":"Dimitra Kale, Sarah Jackson","doi":"10.1111/add.70355","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70355","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146123032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Amy Peacock, Agata Chrzanowska, Nicola Man, Shane Darke, Jared Brown, Jodie Grigg, Paul Dietze, Nadine Ezard, Raimondo Bruno, Krista J Siefried, Caroline Salom, Jack Freestone, Jane Akhurst, Louise Tierney, Rachel Sutherland
Background and aims: There is significant concern about potential rising harms from gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) but an absence of studies internationally synthesising data across indicators to identify changes in harms and broader patterns of use. This paper contributes to addressing this gap by measuring national trends in GHB use, harms and treatment in Australia.
Design, setting, and cases: Triangulation of indicators (2013-2024) from Australian triennial population surveys; annual interviews with cross-sectional non-representative samples of people who use illicit stimulants or who inject drugs; and administrative data on GHB-related hospitalisations, GHB-related deaths, and treatment episodes where GHB was the principal drug of concern.
Measurements: Annual trend data were analysed using Joinpoint regression. Survey data were modelled as the annual percent change in the proportion reporting lifetime, past 12-month, and past 6-month use, depending on the survey. Administrative data were modelled as the annual percent change in crude rates per 100 000 population.
Findings: Lifetime and past 12-month GHB use in the general population remained below 1.2% and 0.2% respectively, but the latter increased from 0.07% in 2013 to 0.19% in 2022-2023 (annual percent change [APC] 9.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.2, 13.2). The percentage of people who use illicit stimulants reporting past 6-month use increased from 5.7% in 2013 to 7.3% in 2017 (APC 11.6; 95%CI: 0.2, 52.9) and from 5.4% in 2019 to 11.5% in 2024 (APC 17.8; 95%CI: 5.9, 41.1). The proportion of people who inject drugs reporting use varied between 7.2% and 17.5% over the short period studied (2020-2024). There were statistically significant increases in GHB-related hospitalisations from 5.3 in 2012-13 to 19.1 per 100 000 people in 2022-23 (APC 19.0; 95%CI: 11.9, 31.1) and GHB-related deaths from 0.02 in 2013 to 0.24 per 100 000 people in 2022 (APC 36.5; 95%CI: 27.2, 58.1). Treatment episodes also increased across the period, from 0.07 in 2012-13 to 6.0 episodes per 100 000 people in 2020-21 (APC 97.3; 95%CI: 83.5, 830.9), with no subsequent statistically significant change (8.4 per 100 000 people in 2022-23).
Conclusions: Gamma-hydroxybutyrate use, harms and treatment engagement increased in Australia from 2013 to 2024. These findings highlight a need to implement acceptable, tailored prevention and harm reduction strategies for key populations, and implement stronger monitoring efforts nationally and internationally.
{"title":"Trends in gamma-hydroxybutyrate use, harms and treatment in Australia, 2013 to 2024.","authors":"Amy Peacock, Agata Chrzanowska, Nicola Man, Shane Darke, Jared Brown, Jodie Grigg, Paul Dietze, Nadine Ezard, Raimondo Bruno, Krista J Siefried, Caroline Salom, Jack Freestone, Jane Akhurst, Louise Tierney, Rachel Sutherland","doi":"10.1111/add.70308","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70308","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>There is significant concern about potential rising harms from gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) but an absence of studies internationally synthesising data across indicators to identify changes in harms and broader patterns of use. This paper contributes to addressing this gap by measuring national trends in GHB use, harms and treatment in Australia.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and cases: </strong>Triangulation of indicators (2013-2024) from Australian triennial population surveys; annual interviews with cross-sectional non-representative samples of people who use illicit stimulants or who inject drugs; and administrative data on GHB-related hospitalisations, GHB-related deaths, and treatment episodes where GHB was the principal drug of concern.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Annual trend data were analysed using Joinpoint regression. Survey data were modelled as the annual percent change in the proportion reporting lifetime, past 12-month, and past 6-month use, depending on the survey. Administrative data were modelled as the annual percent change in crude rates per 100 000 population.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Lifetime and past 12-month GHB use in the general population remained below 1.2% and 0.2% respectively, but the latter increased from 0.07% in 2013 to 0.19% in 2022-2023 (annual percent change [APC] 9.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.2, 13.2). The percentage of people who use illicit stimulants reporting past 6-month use increased from 5.7% in 2013 to 7.3% in 2017 (APC 11.6; 95%CI: 0.2, 52.9) and from 5.4% in 2019 to 11.5% in 2024 (APC 17.8; 95%CI: 5.9, 41.1). The proportion of people who inject drugs reporting use varied between 7.2% and 17.5% over the short period studied (2020-2024). There were statistically significant increases in GHB-related hospitalisations from 5.3 in 2012-13 to 19.1 per 100 000 people in 2022-23 (APC 19.0; 95%CI: 11.9, 31.1) and GHB-related deaths from 0.02 in 2013 to 0.24 per 100 000 people in 2022 (APC 36.5; 95%CI: 27.2, 58.1). Treatment episodes also increased across the period, from 0.07 in 2012-13 to 6.0 episodes per 100 000 people in 2020-21 (APC 97.3; 95%CI: 83.5, 830.9), with no subsequent statistically significant change (8.4 per 100 000 people in 2022-23).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gamma-hydroxybutyrate use, harms and treatment engagement increased in Australia from 2013 to 2024. These findings highlight a need to implement acceptable, tailored prevention and harm reduction strategies for key populations, and implement stronger monitoring efforts nationally and internationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146103204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Damon Morris, Duncan Gillespie, Megan James, Penny Breeze, Alan Brennan
Aims: Industry arguments against public health policies that reduce the consumption of unhealthy commodities often include the assertion that the policy will harm the economy by reducing production and costing jobs. However, this argument does not consider that consumers may spend money previously used for unhealthy commodity consumption on other products, benefiting other sectors and potentially offsetting those negative economic consequences. In this study we aimed to estimate the macroeconomic impacts of reducing consumption of alcohol, tobacco, confectionary and gambling, accounting for reallocation of spending from these commodities to alternatives.
Method: We developed the open-source Commercial Determinants of Health Input-Output (CDOHIO) model version 1.1.0. CDOHIO models inter-sectoral linkages in the United Kingdom (UK) economy using published input-output tables to estimate the macroeconomic outcomes of changes in the total national consumer expenditure on selected unhealthy commodities and the reallocation of this expenditure to other consumption. We modelled a 10% decrease in total consumer expenditure on (1) alcohol, (2) tobacco, (3) confectionary and (4) gambling, assuming that the reduced expenditure was reallocated entirely to other products. The comparator in each case was no change in expenditure. We analysed six economic outcomes: (i) output (the total value of production in the economy), (ii) tax receipts from employees, (iii) tax receipts from employers, (iv) full-time equivalent employment, (v) total net earnings to individuals, and (vi) Gross Value Added (GVA), which is the primary outcome measure used as a proxy for national Gross Domestic Product.
Results: For tobacco, confectionary and gambling, reduced spending was estimated to yield positive effects across all six measures. The total effect of a 10% reduction in confectionary spending was an increase in GVA of £0.389 billion (0.02%), for reduced spending on tobacco, +£1.859 billion GVA (+0.09%) and for gambling +£1.250 billion GVA (+0.06%). For alcohol, a 10% reduction in spending led to a small negative effect on GVA (-£0.134 billion, -0.01%), which is the net effect of positive effects of reduced spending on off-trade alcohol (+£2.543 billion) and negative effects of reduced spending on on-trade alcohol (-£2.677 billion).
Conclusions: The potential negative macroeconomic impacts of reducing spending on tobacco, confectionary and gambling in the United Kingdom could be more than mitigated when consumers reallocate money spent on these products to other consumption. This is also the case for off-trade alcohol consumption, but not for on-trade alcohol consumption.
{"title":"Modelling the economic effects of reducing the consumption of unhealthy commodities: An inter-sectoral input-output approach.","authors":"Damon Morris, Duncan Gillespie, Megan James, Penny Breeze, Alan Brennan","doi":"10.1111/add.70336","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70336","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Industry arguments against public health policies that reduce the consumption of unhealthy commodities often include the assertion that the policy will harm the economy by reducing production and costing jobs. However, this argument does not consider that consumers may spend money previously used for unhealthy commodity consumption on other products, benefiting other sectors and potentially offsetting those negative economic consequences. In this study we aimed to estimate the macroeconomic impacts of reducing consumption of alcohol, tobacco, confectionary and gambling, accounting for reallocation of spending from these commodities to alternatives.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We developed the open-source Commercial Determinants of Health Input-Output (CDOHIO) model version 1.1.0. CDOHIO models inter-sectoral linkages in the United Kingdom (UK) economy using published input-output tables to estimate the macroeconomic outcomes of changes in the total national consumer expenditure on selected unhealthy commodities and the reallocation of this expenditure to other consumption. We modelled a 10% decrease in total consumer expenditure on (1) alcohol, (2) tobacco, (3) confectionary and (4) gambling, assuming that the reduced expenditure was reallocated entirely to other products. The comparator in each case was no change in expenditure. We analysed six economic outcomes: (i) output (the total value of production in the economy), (ii) tax receipts from employees, (iii) tax receipts from employers, (iv) full-time equivalent employment, (v) total net earnings to individuals, and (vi) Gross Value Added (GVA), which is the primary outcome measure used as a proxy for national Gross Domestic Product.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For tobacco, confectionary and gambling, reduced spending was estimated to yield positive effects across all six measures. The total effect of a 10% reduction in confectionary spending was an increase in GVA of £0.389 billion (0.02%), for reduced spending on tobacco, +£1.859 billion GVA (+0.09%) and for gambling +£1.250 billion GVA (+0.06%). For alcohol, a 10% reduction in spending led to a small negative effect on GVA (-£0.134 billion, -0.01%), which is the net effect of positive effects of reduced spending on off-trade alcohol (+£2.543 billion) and negative effects of reduced spending on on-trade alcohol (-£2.677 billion).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The potential negative macroeconomic impacts of reducing spending on tobacco, confectionary and gambling in the United Kingdom could be more than mitigated when consumers reallocate money spent on these products to other consumption. This is also the case for off-trade alcohol consumption, but not for on-trade alcohol consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146103211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The need for a comprehensive opioid overdose prevention program in Iran.","authors":"Pooneh Malekifar, Afarin Rahimi-Movaghar","doi":"10.1111/add.70313","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70313","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background and aims: Tobacco smoking is a major risk factor for cardiovascular and lung diseases. A better understanding of its neurobiological underpinnings will benefit the prevention of smoking-related illnesses and mortality. Previous studies link smoking to increased iron concentration in the striatum, a central component of the brain's reward system, and to reduced cognitive performance. This study aimed to investigate whether smoking and striatal iron share common biological pathways and to assess potential causal relationships between the two.
Methods: Using data from the UK Biobank, we investigated phenotypic and genetic correlations, and causal relationships between smoking initiation and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived markers of iron content (T2* and quantitative susceptibility mapping) in the bilateral putamen, caudate and accumbens nuclei.
Results: We found positive correlations between smoking and striatal iron (β ∈ [0.03, 0.40], P < 0.001), particularly when comparing current smokers with never smokers. Striatal iron was positively associated with pack-years (β ∈ [0.11, 0.13], P < 0.001) and inversely related to years since smoking cessation (β ∈ [0.06, 0.10], P < 0.001), suggesting iron levels may decrease after quitting. Genetic analysis confirmed phenotypic correlations, with shared genetic associations (P < 2.73 × 10-6, or 0.01 for candidate genes) in genes related to dopaminergic, glutamatergic and synaptic systems (DRD2, PPP1R1B, NCAM1, DLX5, GGACT, NAT16, PLEKHM1). Causality analysis revealed a relationship from smoking to striatal iron via genes involved in synaptogenesis and plasticity (BAI3, SEMA6D, TENM2), with evidence of reverse causality from iron to smoking through inflammatory and immune system-related genes (ING5, NLRP7).
Conclusions: There appear to be links between smoking and striatal iron with complex causal mechanisms involving synaptic transmission and inflammatory circuits. Striatal iron content could serve as a biomarker for smoking-related neurobiological changes and a potential target for interventions aimed at mitigating cognitive decline related to striatal iron accumulation.
{"title":"Bidirectional genetic and phenotypic links between smoking and striatal iron content involving dopaminergic and inflammatory pathways.","authors":"Olga Trofimova, Ilaria Iuliani, Sven Bergmann","doi":"10.1111/add.70311","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70311","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Tobacco smoking is a major risk factor for cardiovascular and lung diseases. A better understanding of its neurobiological underpinnings will benefit the prevention of smoking-related illnesses and mortality. Previous studies link smoking to increased iron concentration in the striatum, a central component of the brain's reward system, and to reduced cognitive performance. This study aimed to investigate whether smoking and striatal iron share common biological pathways and to assess potential causal relationships between the two.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the UK Biobank, we investigated phenotypic and genetic correlations, and causal relationships between smoking initiation and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived markers of iron content (T2* and quantitative susceptibility mapping) in the bilateral putamen, caudate and accumbens nuclei.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found positive correlations between smoking and striatal iron (β ∈ [0.03, 0.40], P < 0.001), particularly when comparing current smokers with never smokers. Striatal iron was positively associated with pack-years (β ∈ [0.11, 0.13], P < 0.001) and inversely related to years since smoking cessation (β ∈ [0.06, 0.10], P < 0.001), suggesting iron levels may decrease after quitting. Genetic analysis confirmed phenotypic correlations, with shared genetic associations (P < 2.73 × 10<sup>-6</sup>, or 0.01 for candidate genes) in genes related to dopaminergic, glutamatergic and synaptic systems (DRD2, PPP1R1B, NCAM1, DLX5, GGACT, NAT16, PLEKHM1). Causality analysis revealed a relationship from smoking to striatal iron via genes involved in synaptogenesis and plasticity (BAI3, SEMA6D, TENM2), with evidence of reverse causality from iron to smoking through inflammatory and immune system-related genes (ING5, NLRP7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There appear to be links between smoking and striatal iron with complex causal mechanisms involving synaptic transmission and inflammatory circuits. Striatal iron content could serve as a biomarker for smoking-related neurobiological changes and a potential target for interventions aimed at mitigating cognitive decline related to striatal iron accumulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146096720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yi-Hsuan Liu, Chia-Chun Hung, Marc N Potenza, Kun-Hsien Chou, Pei-Lin Lee, Chu-Chung Huang, Chiang-Shan R Li, Tony Szu-Hsien Lee, Ching-Po Lin
<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Recreational ketamine use has increased globally and is associated with psychiatric and cognitive concerns. The hippocampus in preclinical models shows damage and working-memory disruption with repeated dosing. However, whether specific hippocampal subregions may differ in people with chronic ketamine use remains unclear. In Taiwan, ketamine is predominantly consumed by smoking ketamine mixed with tobacco, producing smoking-related behavioral profiles like non-ketamine tobacco use participants (TUs). We therefore examined individuals with urine-confirmed ketamine as the only detected substance who reported predominantly smoking-administered recreational use (KUs) and used TUs as controls. This study aimed to: (1) characterize ketamine-use patterns and psychiatric symptoms; (2) compare working-memory and affective-behavioral measures between KUs and TUs; (3) quantify group differences in hippocampal subregion volumes; and (4) assess group differences in functional connectivity (FC) of identified subregions and relationships with neurotransmitter receptor distributions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional case-control study with cognitive testing and neuroimaging.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community-based recruitment in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>58 KUs (44 males; mean age = 21.00 ± 4.57) and 73 TUs (52 males; mean age = 24.34 ± 5.86).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Ketamine-use patterns (Addiction Severity Index), psychiatric symptoms [Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R)], working-memory (N-back), affective-behavioral measures [Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11), Buss and Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ), Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ)], hippocampal subfield volumes (FreeSurfer) and functional connectivity (FC) of identified subregions (seed-based analysis). Spatial correspondence with N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor density was evaluated using JuSpace.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Heavier ketamine use was associated with greater psychological distress [Global Severity Index (GSI) r = 0.343, P = 0.011], particularly anxiety (r = 0.457, P < 0.001) and hostility (r = 0.442, P < 0.001). Although self-reported impulsivity, aggression and reward/punishment sensitivity did not differ between groups, KUs showed reduced accuracy under higher working-memory load [2-back: F(1, 124) = 4.16, P = 0.04, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.03; 1-back: F(1, 124) = 8.10, P = 0.005, η2 = 0.06]. KUs displayed reduced left hippocampal volume [F(1, 119) = 4.23, P = 0.04, η2 = 0.03], most marked in the hippocampal-amygdaloid-transition-area [HATA; F(1, 119) = 10.52, P = 0.002, η2 = 0.08]. KUs also showed increased FC between left HATA and frontal, cingulate, temporal, subcortical, insular and cerebellar regions (P < 0.05, AlphaSim corrected), which correlated with NMDA-receptor distributions (z = 0.30, P = 0.005, false discovery rate co
背景和目的:娱乐性氯胺酮的使用在全球范围内有所增加,并与精神和认知问题有关。临床前模型海马在重复给药后出现损伤和工作记忆中断。然而,在长期使用氯胺酮的人群中,特定的海马亚区是否会有所不同仍不清楚。在台湾,氯胺酮主要是通过吸食氯胺酮混合烟草来消耗的,产生与吸烟相关的行为特征,如非氯胺酮烟草使用参与者(TUs)。因此,我们对尿检证实氯胺酮是唯一检测到的物质的个体进行了检查,这些个体报告主要是吸烟引起的娱乐性使用(KUs),并以tu作为对照。本研究旨在:(1)表征氯胺酮使用模式和精神症状;(2)在工作记忆和情感行为测量方面,ku和tu的差异比较;(3)量化各组海马亚区体积差异;(4)评估鉴定亚区功能连通性(FC)的组间差异及其与神经递质受体分布的关系。设计:采用认知测试和神经成像的横断面病例对照研究。设定:台湾社区招聘。研究对象:KUs 58人(男性44人,平均年龄21.00±4.57岁),tu 73人(男性52人,平均年龄24.34±5.86岁)。测量方法:氯胺酮使用模式(成瘾严重程度指数)、精神症状(症状量表-90-修订(SCL-90-R))、工作记忆(N-back)、情感行为测量(Barratt冲动性量表(bis11)、Buss和Perry攻击问卷(BPAQ)、惩罚敏感性和奖励敏感性问卷(SPSRQ))、海马子区体积(FreeSurfer)和识别子区的功能连通性(FC)(基于种子的分析)。利用JuSpace评价了n -甲基- d -天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体密度与空间对应关系。结果:氯胺酮使用越重,心理压力越大[全球严重程度指数(GSI) r = 0.343, P = 0.011],尤其是焦虑(r = 0.457, P 2 = 0.03; 1-back: F(1,124) = 8.10, P = 0.005, η2 = 0.06]。KUs表现为左海马体积缩小[F(1,119) = 4.23, P = 0.04, η2 = 0.03],最明显的是海马-杏仁核-过渡区[HATA;F(1,119) = 10.52, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.08]。KUs还显示左侧HATA与额、扣带、颞、皮质下、岛和小脑区域之间的FC增加(P结论:娱乐性吸烟给予氯胺酮的使用似乎与剂量依赖性精神症状、负荷依赖性工作记忆障碍、选择性海马亚区体积差异和与n -甲基-d -天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体分布一致的网络连接改变有关。
{"title":"Hippocampal subfield differences in people with and without recreational ketamine use: Insights from multi-modal neuroimaging.","authors":"Yi-Hsuan Liu, Chia-Chun Hung, Marc N Potenza, Kun-Hsien Chou, Pei-Lin Lee, Chu-Chung Huang, Chiang-Shan R Li, Tony Szu-Hsien Lee, Ching-Po Lin","doi":"10.1111/add.70331","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70331","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Recreational ketamine use has increased globally and is associated with psychiatric and cognitive concerns. The hippocampus in preclinical models shows damage and working-memory disruption with repeated dosing. However, whether specific hippocampal subregions may differ in people with chronic ketamine use remains unclear. In Taiwan, ketamine is predominantly consumed by smoking ketamine mixed with tobacco, producing smoking-related behavioral profiles like non-ketamine tobacco use participants (TUs). We therefore examined individuals with urine-confirmed ketamine as the only detected substance who reported predominantly smoking-administered recreational use (KUs) and used TUs as controls. This study aimed to: (1) characterize ketamine-use patterns and psychiatric symptoms; (2) compare working-memory and affective-behavioral measures between KUs and TUs; (3) quantify group differences in hippocampal subregion volumes; and (4) assess group differences in functional connectivity (FC) of identified subregions and relationships with neurotransmitter receptor distributions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional case-control study with cognitive testing and neuroimaging.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community-based recruitment in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>58 KUs (44 males; mean age = 21.00 ± 4.57) and 73 TUs (52 males; mean age = 24.34 ± 5.86).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Ketamine-use patterns (Addiction Severity Index), psychiatric symptoms [Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R)], working-memory (N-back), affective-behavioral measures [Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11), Buss and Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ), Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ)], hippocampal subfield volumes (FreeSurfer) and functional connectivity (FC) of identified subregions (seed-based analysis). Spatial correspondence with N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor density was evaluated using JuSpace.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Heavier ketamine use was associated with greater psychological distress [Global Severity Index (GSI) r = 0.343, P = 0.011], particularly anxiety (r = 0.457, P < 0.001) and hostility (r = 0.442, P < 0.001). Although self-reported impulsivity, aggression and reward/punishment sensitivity did not differ between groups, KUs showed reduced accuracy under higher working-memory load [2-back: F(1, 124) = 4.16, P = 0.04, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.03; 1-back: F(1, 124) = 8.10, P = 0.005, η2 = 0.06]. KUs displayed reduced left hippocampal volume [F(1, 119) = 4.23, P = 0.04, η2 = 0.03], most marked in the hippocampal-amygdaloid-transition-area [HATA; F(1, 119) = 10.52, P = 0.002, η2 = 0.08]. KUs also showed increased FC between left HATA and frontal, cingulate, temporal, subcortical, insular and cerebellar regions (P < 0.05, AlphaSim corrected), which correlated with NMDA-receptor distributions (z = 0.30, P = 0.005, false discovery rate co","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146083607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
André J McDonald, Amanda Doggett, Susan J Bondy, Ian Colman, Steven Cook, Hayley A Hamilton, Paul Kurdyak, Scott T Leatherdale, Daniel T Myran, Jürgen Rehm, Christine M Wickens, James MacKillop, Jillian Halladay
<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Epidemiologic research suggests that adolescent cannabis use is associated with psychological distress (i.e. depression and anxiety symptoms); however, most studies have relied on 20th-century data, when cannabis was significantly less potent than today. This study aimed to estimate the association between adolescent cannabis use and psychological distress using contemporary population-based data and examine the roles of time [as a proxy for increasing Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) potency], sex and age of initiation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Representative cross-sectional survey conducted biennially from 2013 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>35 007 adolescents in grades 7 to 12.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Past-year cannabis use was categorized as Never, 1-2 times, 3-9 times, 10-39 times or 40+ times. Psychological distress was measured with the Kessler-6 scale using a cut-off score of 13+ indicating anxiety/depression symptoms. Multivariable modified Poisson and least-squares models were used to estimate the association between past-year cannabis use and psychological distress. Survey year and sex were tested as effect modifiers on the multiplicative and additive scales. The association between school grade of cannabis use initiation and psychological distress was also estimated.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>From 2013 to 2023, the prevalence of psychological distress increased from 10.7% to 27.4%, whereas cannabis use decreased from 23.1% to 17.6%. Survey year and sex were statistically significant effect modifiers for the association between cannabis use and psychological distress with associations consistent with a super-additive effect but not multiplicative synergy (additive interactions: P < 0.05; multiplicative interactions: P > 0.05). The association between cannabis use and psychological distress strengthened over time, particularly for those using 40+ times compared with abstinence (from 0% [95% confidence interval (CI) = -6% to 6%] adjusted prevalence difference in 2013 to 18% (95% CI = 11%-25%] adjusted prevalence difference in 2023). Independent of time, there was evidence of dose-response among females, but not males. A 5% (95% CI = 1%-10%) lower prevalence of psychological distress was observed per later school grade of cannabis use initiation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Psychological distress increased markedly among adolescents in Ontario, Canada, from 2013 to 2023. In that setting, adolescent cannabis use was statistically significantly associated with psychological distress, especially among females, and this association increased in magnitude over time, especially for those using most frequently. It is possible that adolescents are increasingly self-medicating psychological distress with cannabis and/or that rising cannabis potency is increasingly contributing to psychological distress. While caus
背景和目的:流行病学研究表明,青少年使用大麻与心理困扰(即抑郁和焦虑症状)有关;然而,大多数研究都依赖于20世纪的数据,当时大麻的效力明显不如今天。本研究旨在利用当代基于人口的数据估计青少年大麻使用与心理困扰之间的关系,并检查时间[作为增加Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)效力的代理],性别和开始年龄的作用。设计:2013 - 2023年每两年进行一次代表性横断面调查。环境:加拿大安大略省。参与者:35 007名7至12年级的青少年。测量:过去一年的大麻使用分为从未,1-2次,3-9次,10-39次或40+次。采用Kessler-6量表测量心理困扰,分值为13+,表示焦虑/抑郁症状。使用多变量修正泊松和最小二乘模型来估计过去一年大麻使用与心理困扰之间的关系。调查年份和性别作为乘法和加性量表的影响调节因子。还估计了开始使用大麻的学校年级与心理困扰之间的关系。研究发现:从2013年到2023年,心理困扰的患病率从10.7%上升到27.4%,而大麻的使用率从23.1%下降到17.6%。调查年份和性别是大麻使用与心理困扰之间关联的统计学显著影响修饰因子,其关联符合超加性效应,但不符合乘法协同效应(加性相互作用:P 0.05)。大麻使用与心理困扰之间的关系随着时间的推移而加强,特别是那些使用大麻40次以上的人与戒断相比(从2013年的0%[95%置信区间(CI) = -6%至6%]调整后的流行差异到2023年的18% (95% CI = 11%-25%]调整后的流行差异)。与时间无关,在女性中有剂量反应的证据,但在男性中没有。根据开始使用大麻的学校年级,心理困扰的患病率降低5% (95% CI = 1%-10%)。结论:2013年至2023年,加拿大安大略省青少年的心理困扰显著增加。在这种情况下,青少年大麻的使用在统计上与心理困扰显著相关,尤其是在女性中,这种关联随着时间的推移而增加,特别是对于那些使用最频繁的人。有可能是青少年越来越多地用大麻自我治疗心理困扰和/或大麻效力的增强日益加剧了心理困扰。虽然无法确定因果关系,但根据预防原则,政策制定者应优先考虑旨在减少使用频率、限制效力和延迟开始使用年龄的大麻预防战略,特别是在女性中。
{"title":"Adolescent cannabis use and psychological distress from 2013 to 2023: A population-based study in Ontario, Canada.","authors":"André J McDonald, Amanda Doggett, Susan J Bondy, Ian Colman, Steven Cook, Hayley A Hamilton, Paul Kurdyak, Scott T Leatherdale, Daniel T Myran, Jürgen Rehm, Christine M Wickens, James MacKillop, Jillian Halladay","doi":"10.1111/add.70333","DOIUrl":"10.1111/add.70333","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Epidemiologic research suggests that adolescent cannabis use is associated with psychological distress (i.e. depression and anxiety symptoms); however, most studies have relied on 20th-century data, when cannabis was significantly less potent than today. This study aimed to estimate the association between adolescent cannabis use and psychological distress using contemporary population-based data and examine the roles of time [as a proxy for increasing Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) potency], sex and age of initiation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Representative cross-sectional survey conducted biennially from 2013 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>35 007 adolescents in grades 7 to 12.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Past-year cannabis use was categorized as Never, 1-2 times, 3-9 times, 10-39 times or 40+ times. Psychological distress was measured with the Kessler-6 scale using a cut-off score of 13+ indicating anxiety/depression symptoms. Multivariable modified Poisson and least-squares models were used to estimate the association between past-year cannabis use and psychological distress. Survey year and sex were tested as effect modifiers on the multiplicative and additive scales. The association between school grade of cannabis use initiation and psychological distress was also estimated.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>From 2013 to 2023, the prevalence of psychological distress increased from 10.7% to 27.4%, whereas cannabis use decreased from 23.1% to 17.6%. Survey year and sex were statistically significant effect modifiers for the association between cannabis use and psychological distress with associations consistent with a super-additive effect but not multiplicative synergy (additive interactions: P < 0.05; multiplicative interactions: P > 0.05). The association between cannabis use and psychological distress strengthened over time, particularly for those using 40+ times compared with abstinence (from 0% [95% confidence interval (CI) = -6% to 6%] adjusted prevalence difference in 2013 to 18% (95% CI = 11%-25%] adjusted prevalence difference in 2023). Independent of time, there was evidence of dose-response among females, but not males. A 5% (95% CI = 1%-10%) lower prevalence of psychological distress was observed per later school grade of cannabis use initiation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Psychological distress increased markedly among adolescents in Ontario, Canada, from 2013 to 2023. In that setting, adolescent cannabis use was statistically significantly associated with psychological distress, especially among females, and this association increased in magnitude over time, especially for those using most frequently. It is possible that adolescents are increasingly self-medicating psychological distress with cannabis and/or that rising cannabis potency is increasingly contributing to psychological distress. While caus","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146058331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anna L Bowring, Tom Tidhar, Anna Olsen, Christopher Bailie, Kelvin Burke, Rowan Martin-Hughes, Helen Keane, Paul Dietze, Nick Scott
<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Harm reduction interventions aim to reduce negative consequences of drug use. We aimed to estimate the cost, health impact and economic benefits of current, expanded and new harm reduction interventions for people who use drugs in the Australian Capital Territory.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a cost-benefit analysis of existing and new harm reduction interventions in the Australian Capital Territory. Independent decision tree models captured health outcomes [opioid/non-opioid overdose; overdose-related deaths; injection-related skin/soft tissue/vascular infections (IRIs); hepatitis C incidence] for 2026-2030 according to intervention coverage.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Australian Capital Territory, Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants/cases: </strong>People who use drugs through injecting (n = 1500) or non-injecting (n = 33 600) routes differentiated by drug class (opioid/non-opioid).</p><p><strong>Interventions and comparator: </strong>A baseline scenario (current intervention coverage maintained) was compared with a counterfactual no interventions scenario, as well as scenarios with interventions linearly scaled up to the assumed maximum proportion of the target population that could be reached given geographical, social and implementation constraints. Interventions included in the analysis were: drug consumption rooms, needle-syringe programs, take-home naloxone, opioid agonist treatment, safer opioid supply, drug checking services and technological interventions (i.e. overdose monitoring 'apps'/hotlines).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Economic benefits were estimated from health costs averted (emergency response; shorter hospitalisation for IRI; hepatitis C treatment) and societal costs from years of life lost. Benefit-cost ratios were calculated compared to the baseline. A sensitivity analysis considered a changed illicit drug market with increased probability of overdose and overdose-related death.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Compared with no coverage, the current package of harm reduction interventions was estimated to cost $24.6 million over 2026-2030 and avert 454 (24%) opioid and 20 (0.2%) non-opioid overdoses, 70 (28%) overdose-related deaths, 215 (17%) emergency responses, 552 (117%) hepatitis C infections and 199 (9%) IRIs. This corresponds to $250.1 million in economic benefits [benefit-cost ratio = 10.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 7.9-12.4]. Benefit-cost ratios for scaling up take-home naloxone [16.4 (5.0-27.9)], opioid agonist treatment [10.2 (5.6-15.3)], technological interventions [3.5 (0.0-15.7)], drug consumption room/s using medialised [1.9 (0.6-3.9)] or nurse/peer-led model [2.7 (1.2-4.4)], safer opioid supply [1.5 (0.8-2.6)] and needle-syringe programs [1.4 (0.7-2.6)] were favourable. The benefit-cost ratio for drug checking was 0.3 (0.0-6.2) but increased to 14.0 (0.1-29.6) under changed drug market conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </stron
{"title":"A cost-benefit analysis of the implementation and scale-up of harm reduction interventions in the Australian Capital Territory.","authors":"Anna L Bowring, Tom Tidhar, Anna Olsen, Christopher Bailie, Kelvin Burke, Rowan Martin-Hughes, Helen Keane, Paul Dietze, Nick Scott","doi":"10.1111/add.70276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70276","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Harm reduction interventions aim to reduce negative consequences of drug use. We aimed to estimate the cost, health impact and economic benefits of current, expanded and new harm reduction interventions for people who use drugs in the Australian Capital Territory.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a cost-benefit analysis of existing and new harm reduction interventions in the Australian Capital Territory. Independent decision tree models captured health outcomes [opioid/non-opioid overdose; overdose-related deaths; injection-related skin/soft tissue/vascular infections (IRIs); hepatitis C incidence] for 2026-2030 according to intervention coverage.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Australian Capital Territory, Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants/cases: </strong>People who use drugs through injecting (n = 1500) or non-injecting (n = 33 600) routes differentiated by drug class (opioid/non-opioid).</p><p><strong>Interventions and comparator: </strong>A baseline scenario (current intervention coverage maintained) was compared with a counterfactual no interventions scenario, as well as scenarios with interventions linearly scaled up to the assumed maximum proportion of the target population that could be reached given geographical, social and implementation constraints. Interventions included in the analysis were: drug consumption rooms, needle-syringe programs, take-home naloxone, opioid agonist treatment, safer opioid supply, drug checking services and technological interventions (i.e. overdose monitoring 'apps'/hotlines).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Economic benefits were estimated from health costs averted (emergency response; shorter hospitalisation for IRI; hepatitis C treatment) and societal costs from years of life lost. Benefit-cost ratios were calculated compared to the baseline. A sensitivity analysis considered a changed illicit drug market with increased probability of overdose and overdose-related death.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Compared with no coverage, the current package of harm reduction interventions was estimated to cost $24.6 million over 2026-2030 and avert 454 (24%) opioid and 20 (0.2%) non-opioid overdoses, 70 (28%) overdose-related deaths, 215 (17%) emergency responses, 552 (117%) hepatitis C infections and 199 (9%) IRIs. This corresponds to $250.1 million in economic benefits [benefit-cost ratio = 10.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 7.9-12.4]. Benefit-cost ratios for scaling up take-home naloxone [16.4 (5.0-27.9)], opioid agonist treatment [10.2 (5.6-15.3)], technological interventions [3.5 (0.0-15.7)], drug consumption room/s using medialised [1.9 (0.6-3.9)] or nurse/peer-led model [2.7 (1.2-4.4)], safer opioid supply [1.5 (0.8-2.6)] and needle-syringe programs [1.4 (0.7-2.6)] were favourable. The benefit-cost ratio for drug checking was 0.3 (0.0-6.2) but increased to 14.0 (0.1-29.6) under changed drug market conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </stron","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146058241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Samatha Pararath, Zhen He, Joshua Millward, Emmanuel Kuntsche, Benjamin Riordan
Background and aims: Thanks to smart devices, social media and streaming platforms, watching videos, like movies or short social media clips, has become extremely popular. Alcohol portrayals are frequent in videos, yet their prevalence is difficult to quantify using traditional methods such as manual coding. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a scalable solution to analyse large volumes of video images. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of three AI models in detecting alcohol presence in video images.
Method: Experimental evaluation of three models: one supervised deep learning model (ABIDLA2) and two zero-shot learning models (ZSL-CLIP and ZSL-LLaVA). The models were tested on datasets of video frames that had been annotated by researchers for whether they included alcohol or not. Three datasets of increasing complexity were used: (1) a Google/Bing image set of clearly visible alcohol and non-alcohol images; (2) a set of movie frames manually annotated as containing or not containing alcohol; and (3) a contextually challenging set of movie frames from alcohol-related settings (e.g. bars, parties) that may or may not include visible alcohol. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, unweighted average recall (UAR) and F1 score, representing the balance between precision and recall. Execution time per frame was also measured to evaluate computational efficiency.
Results: Across the three datasets, ABIDLA2, ZSL-CLIP and ZSL-LLaVA achieved percentage accuracies of 90%, 91% and 92% on the Google/Bing images; 70%, 65% and 95% on the diverse movie-scene dataset; and 67%, 63% and 94% on the most complex alcohol-related dataset, respectively. In terms of execution time, ABIDLA2 processed a single frame the fastest (0.21 seconds), followed by ZSL-LLaVA (0.45 seconds), while ZSL-CLIP was the slowest (0.58 seconds).
Conclusion: Automated artificial intelligence (AI) models appear to be able to detect alcohol imagery in videos at large scale with high accuracy and in near real time. Of the three AI models tested, ZSL-LLaVA achieved the best balance between accuracy and speed. Offering a cost- and time-efficient alternative to labour-intensive manual coding, ZSL-LLaVA could be used to monitor alcohol-related visual content in videos across diverse media platforms.
{"title":"Comparing the accuracy of artificial intelligence models to detect alcohol in video images.","authors":"Samatha Pararath, Zhen He, Joshua Millward, Emmanuel Kuntsche, Benjamin Riordan","doi":"10.1111/add.70337","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70337","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Thanks to smart devices, social media and streaming platforms, watching videos, like movies or short social media clips, has become extremely popular. Alcohol portrayals are frequent in videos, yet their prevalence is difficult to quantify using traditional methods such as manual coding. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a scalable solution to analyse large volumes of video images. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of three AI models in detecting alcohol presence in video images.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Experimental evaluation of three models: one supervised deep learning model (ABIDLA2) and two zero-shot learning models (ZSL-CLIP and ZSL-LLaVA). The models were tested on datasets of video frames that had been annotated by researchers for whether they included alcohol or not. Three datasets of increasing complexity were used: (1) a Google/Bing image set of clearly visible alcohol and non-alcohol images; (2) a set of movie frames manually annotated as containing or not containing alcohol; and (3) a contextually challenging set of movie frames from alcohol-related settings (e.g. bars, parties) that may or may not include visible alcohol. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, unweighted average recall (UAR) and F1 score, representing the balance between precision and recall. Execution time per frame was also measured to evaluate computational efficiency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the three datasets, ABIDLA2, ZSL-CLIP and ZSL-LLaVA achieved percentage accuracies of 90%, 91% and 92% on the Google/Bing images; 70%, 65% and 95% on the diverse movie-scene dataset; and 67%, 63% and 94% on the most complex alcohol-related dataset, respectively. In terms of execution time, ABIDLA2 processed a single frame the fastest (0.21 seconds), followed by ZSL-LLaVA (0.45 seconds), while ZSL-CLIP was the slowest (0.58 seconds).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automated artificial intelligence (AI) models appear to be able to detect alcohol imagery in videos at large scale with high accuracy and in near real time. Of the three AI models tested, ZSL-LLaVA achieved the best balance between accuracy and speed. Offering a cost- and time-efficient alternative to labour-intensive manual coding, ZSL-LLaVA could be used to monitor alcohol-related visual content in videos across diverse media platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146049587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}