{"title":"Mode of delivery may seriously affect omics studies using umbilical cord blood and amniotic fluid.","authors":"Yun Huang, Lin Zhang, Qian Chen, Jun Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07828-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a general lack of awareness regarding how the mode of delivery can significantly influence the omics composition of biological samples such as umbilical cord blood and amniotic fluid. To address this, we analyzed the impact of delivery mode on proteomic and metabolomic profiles in a cohort of 40 healthy pregnant women without complications, including 16 who had vaginal delivery (VD), 16 who underwent elective cesarean delivery by maternal request (CS), and 8 who had intrapartum cesarean section (Intra_CS). Using label-free liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for proteomic and untargeted metabolomic analyses, we compared amniotic fluid and cord blood samples across delivery modes. The amniotic fluid proteomic and metabolomic profiles of CS women exhibited clear separation from those of VD individuals, whereas only the proteomic profiles of the Intra_CS group differed when compared to the CS group. In cord blood, metabolomic profiles differed between CS and VD women, but proteomic profiles showed no separation. These findings highlight the significant impact of delivery mode on omics profiles, particularly amniotic fluid proteomics and metabolomics, and cord blood metabolomics. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and expand their generalizability to broader populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07828-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is a general lack of awareness regarding how the mode of delivery can significantly influence the omics composition of biological samples such as umbilical cord blood and amniotic fluid. To address this, we analyzed the impact of delivery mode on proteomic and metabolomic profiles in a cohort of 40 healthy pregnant women without complications, including 16 who had vaginal delivery (VD), 16 who underwent elective cesarean delivery by maternal request (CS), and 8 who had intrapartum cesarean section (Intra_CS). Using label-free liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for proteomic and untargeted metabolomic analyses, we compared amniotic fluid and cord blood samples across delivery modes. The amniotic fluid proteomic and metabolomic profiles of CS women exhibited clear separation from those of VD individuals, whereas only the proteomic profiles of the Intra_CS group differed when compared to the CS group. In cord blood, metabolomic profiles differed between CS and VD women, but proteomic profiles showed no separation. These findings highlight the significant impact of delivery mode on omics profiles, particularly amniotic fluid proteomics and metabolomics, and cord blood metabolomics. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and expand their generalizability to broader populations.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report".
The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.