The completeness of national hip and knee replacement registers.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Acta Orthopaedica Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.2340/17453674.2024.42303
Jonathan M R French, Kevin Deere, Michael R Whitehouse, Derek J Pegg, Enrico Ciminello, Riccardo Valentini, Marina Torre, Keijo Mäkelä, Anne Lübbeke, Eric R Bohm, Anne Marie Fenstad, Ove Furnes, Geir Hallan, Jinny Willis, Søren Overgaard, Ola Rolfson, Adrian Sayers
{"title":"The completeness of national hip and knee replacement registers.","authors":"Jonathan M R French, Kevin Deere, Michael R Whitehouse, Derek J Pegg, Enrico Ciminello, Riccardo Valentini, Marina Torre, Keijo Mäkelä, Anne Lübbeke, Eric R Bohm, Anne Marie Fenstad, Ove Furnes, Geir Hallan, Jinny Willis, Søren Overgaard, Ola Rolfson, Adrian Sayers","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2024.42303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> National joint replacement registries were developed for prospective monitoring of outcomes and post-market surveillance of implants. Increasingly registry data informs practice. However, analysis of a registry can only be as good as the data it captures on the population of interest. We aimed to analyze completeness of reporting of hip and knee replacement procedures for all national registries worldwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed annual reports and data provided following written requests to all active national hip and knee replacement registries. Coverage was defined as the proportion of hospitals in the country that participate in the registry. Procedure completeness was defined as the proportion of procedures successfully captured by the registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> 14 national registries were included, spanning years 2004 to 2022. Coverage was complete in 10. Median procedure completeness for primary hip and knee replacement across all years was 96.5% (interquartile range [IQR] 94.0-97.7%). Median procedure completeness for revisions was 88.5% (IQR 81.0-92.5%). The terminology used and method of calculation of completeness estimates in the registries were variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> National hip and knee replacement registry data generally reflects excellent coverage (full in 10 of 14 registries) and completeness (primary procedures 96.5% and revisions 88.5%) over the last 2 decades.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"95 ","pages":"654-660"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose:  National joint replacement registries were developed for prospective monitoring of outcomes and post-market surveillance of implants. Increasingly registry data informs practice. However, analysis of a registry can only be as good as the data it captures on the population of interest. We aimed to analyze completeness of reporting of hip and knee replacement procedures for all national registries worldwide.

Methods: We analyzed annual reports and data provided following written requests to all active national hip and knee replacement registries. Coverage was defined as the proportion of hospitals in the country that participate in the registry. Procedure completeness was defined as the proportion of procedures successfully captured by the registry.

Results:  14 national registries were included, spanning years 2004 to 2022. Coverage was complete in 10. Median procedure completeness for primary hip and knee replacement across all years was 96.5% (interquartile range [IQR] 94.0-97.7%). Median procedure completeness for revisions was 88.5% (IQR 81.0-92.5%). The terminology used and method of calculation of completeness estimates in the registries were variable.

Conclusion:  National hip and knee replacement registry data generally reflects excellent coverage (full in 10 of 14 registries) and completeness (primary procedures 96.5% and revisions 88.5%) over the last 2 decades.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家髋关节和膝关节置换登记册的完整性。
背景和目的:国家关节置换登记处是为前瞻性监测结果和植入物上市后监测而开发的。登记数据越来越多地为实践提供依据。然而,对登记数据的分析只能与它所捕获的相关人群的数据一样好。我们的目标是分析全球所有国家登记处髋关节和膝关节置换手术报告的完整性:我们分析了年度报告以及根据书面请求向所有活跃的国家髋关节和膝关节置换登记处提供的数据。覆盖率是指参与登记的医院在全国所占的比例。手术完整性的定义是登记处成功记录的手术比例: 结果:共纳入了 14 个国家登记处,时间跨度为 2004 年至 2022 年。其中 10 个登记册的覆盖范围是完整的。各年初次髋关节和膝关节置换手术的中位完整率为96.5%(四分位距[IQR] 94.0-97.7%)。翻修手术的中位完整率为 88.5%(IQR 81.0-92.5%)。各登记处使用的术语和完整性估计值的计算方法各不相同: 全国髋关节和膝关节置换登记数据总体上反映了过去20年中良好的覆盖率(14个登记处中的10个登记处为全覆盖)和完整性(初次手术为96.5%,翻修手术为88.5%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
期刊最新文献
Incidence and risk factors of adverse events after distal radius fracture fixation with volar locking plates: retrospective analysis of 2,790 cases. The completeness of national hip and knee replacement registers. Can KOOS-PS be replaced with a simple anchor question in patients after total knee arthroplasty?: an agreement study of 2,478 primary surgeries. Erratum: Regional variation in low-value musculoskeletal surgery: a nationwide study from the Finnish Care Register. Measurement of acute postoperative pain intensity in orthopedic trials: a qualitative concept elicitation study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1