NDP-β-d-manno-heptoses are small molecule agonists sensed by the vertebrates to discriminate organisms of different kingdoms

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Clinical and Translational Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1002/ctm2.70103
Yue Tang, Zijian Zhong, Huijin Mao, Yihua Chen
{"title":"NDP-β-d-manno-heptoses are small molecule agonists sensed by the vertebrates to discriminate organisms of different kingdoms","authors":"Yue Tang,&nbsp;Zijian Zhong,&nbsp;Huijin Mao,&nbsp;Yihua Chen","doi":"10.1002/ctm2.70103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The mammalian innate immune system engages germline-encoded pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) to sense the agonists from invading organisms to discriminate ‘self’ and ‘nonself’.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Those agonists are usually large molecular signatures termed pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs), such as bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and fungal <i>β-</i>glucan recognized by toll-like receptor 4 or dectin-1, respectively.<span><sup>2, 3</sup></span> Notably, several recent works revealed that, besides the molecular patterns, specific small molecules can also act as agonists that elicit innate immune responses efficiently.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Several <i>β-</i><span>d</span>-<i>manno</i>-heptose metabolites involved in the biosynthesis of LPSs have been identified as small molecule agonists that can be recognized by host alpha-protein kinase 1 (ALPK1), with ADP-<span>d</span>-<i>glycero</i>-<i>β-</i><span>d</span>-<i>manno</i>-heptose (ADP-heptose) and its C-6′′ epimer as the most potent ones.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Upon binding to ADP-heptose, ALPK1 will undergo conformational changes to phosphorylate TRAF-interacting protein with forkhead-associated domain (TIFA), and then triggers the activation of Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and inflammation.</p><p>ADP-heptose is synthesized from <span>d</span>-sedoheptulose 7-phosphate (S7P) via a four-step relay catalyzed by NDP-<span>h</span>eptose <span>b</span>iosynthetic <span>e</span>nzymes (HBEs) with isomerase, kinase, phosphatase, and nucleotidyltransferase activities (Figure 1). Three types of <span>H</span>B<span>E</span>s with <span>n</span>ucleotidyltransfer<span>ase</span> (HENase) activities were identified, including monodomain nucleotidyltransferase, didomain kinase/nucleotidyltransferase, and tridomain isomerase/kinase/nucleotidyltransferase.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Before our work, knowledge of HBEs is limited to bacteria. We expanded the understanding of HBEs repertoire beyond the territory of bacteria to viruses, archaea, and eukaryotes.<span><sup>7</sup></span> Enzymatic characterization of HBEs from different kingdoms verified that all of them could synthesize ADP-heptose and some HENases could also recognize CTP and UTP to generate two new heptose metabolites, CDP-<span>d</span>-<i>glycero</i>-<i>β-</i><span>d</span>-<i>manno</i>-heptose (CDP-heptose) and UDP-<span>d</span>-<i>glycero</i>-<i>β-</i><span>d</span>-<i>manno</i>-heptose (UDP-heptose). Systematic evaluation of the NTP substrate scopes of HENases identified a conserved (F/L)XXG<b>R</b>STT motif (STT<sub>R5</sub>) as a hallmark of HENases with high NTP substrate promiscuity (Figure 1). The fifth arginine residue of the STT<sub>R5</sub> motif may stabilize NTP in a reactive conformation by contributing cation-π interaction with its nucleotide base and hydrogen bonds with its phosphate groups, thereby enabling the HENases to take different NTPs to produce not only ADP-heptose but also CDP- and/or UDP-heptoses. STT<sub>R5</sub> could be found in all three types of HENases occurring in bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, suggesting that ADP-, CDP-. and UDP-heptoses could be synthesized by a variety of organisms. The cellular levels of different NDP-heptoses were detected in two representative pathogenic <i>Burkholderia</i> strains, revealing that all of the three NDP-heptoses were accumulated to considerable amounts.<span><sup>7</sup></span></p><p>A comparison of the crystal structures of ALPK1-CDP-heptose and ALPK1-ADP-heptose complexes with the predicted structure of the ALPK1-UDP-heptose complex revealed a common binding pattern of these molecules. Not surprisingly, CDP- and UDP-heptoses are also potent agonists that can activate the kinase activity of ALPK1 and drive it to phosphorylate TIFA with similar efficiencies as ADP-heptose in vitro. While, tests in human and mouse cells showed that CDP- or UDP-heptose can trigger much stronger ALPK1-dependent innate immune responses than ADP-heptose, which was also observed in the in vivo assays of mice. Further investigation showed that similar performances were observed when electroporation of ADP-, CDP-, or UDP-heptose into 293 T cells, indicating a potential difference in the delivery efficiencies of the three metabolites into the host cells.<span><sup>7</sup></span> The results raised interesting questions as that, for the ALPK1-mediated immune responses elicited by organisms like <i>Burkholderia</i>, which of the three NDP-heptoses is the most important agonist? Can we modulate the host's innate immunity by controlling the production of different NDP heptoses?</p><p>Analysis of the distribution of ALPK1 and TIFA homologs revealed a limited occurrence in vertebrates (Figure 1). In contrast, HBEs are widely distributed in bacteria, archaea, viruses, and some simple eukaryotes belonging to Protostomia, which implies that, after deuterostomes lost the ability to synthesize NDP-heptose, some vertebrates evolved a signalling pathway using ALPK1 as the receptor to discriminate ‘themselves’ from numerous NDP-heptose producers. ALPK1s from fishes, amphibians, birds, and mammals exhibited comparable efficiencies in activating the ALPK1-TIFA-NF-<i>κ</i>B signalling cascade, indicating this immunity axis is quite conservative. Unlike PAMPs or MAMPs that are “molecular patterns” specific to certain groups of microorganisms, small molecule agonists like NDP-heptose can be produced by organisms from different kingdoms, including microorganisms, plants (Dinophytes), and animals (Arthropoda, Mollusca, etc.), which enables the host to efficiently sense varied invaders via a common innate immunity receptor. The evolutionary relationship between HBEs and ALPK1s may offer a fresh perspective on how to search for other small-molecule immune agonists and their PRRs.</p><p>The widespread occurrence of HBEs indicated that heptoses may play more biological roles than what we have known to date, especially in their producers. Actually, there are only limited studies to show that <i>manno</i>-heptose can participate in the installation of cell wall components (e.g. LPSs and capsular polysaccharides), the post-translational heptosylation of certain proteins, and the biosynthesis of natural products (e.g., septacidin) in bacteria.<span><sup>8-10</sup></span> It was suggested that archaea <i>Methanococcus maripaludis</i> S2 possesses the ability to synthesize ADP-heptose, but the reason why archaea tend to produce <i>manno</i>-heptose remains elusive. The same questions are also unsolved in the HBE-containing plants, animals, and viruses. Moreover, in addition to ADP-heptose, a lot of the HBEs are capable of synthesizing CDP- and UDP-heptoses, while few works have been done to understand the physiological roles of the newly discovered NDP-heptoses. Analysis of the conserved genes adjacent to the HBE-encoding genes may offer some hints about their physiological functions in bacteria, which tend to cluster functional related genes together. Knowledge from bacteria may provide some clues for tracking the roles of <i>manno</i>-heptose in the other kingdoms.</p><p>Furthermore, considering the large amounts and significant diversity of HBEs, this group of enzymes deserve to be investigated deeply. There may be other <i>manno</i>-heptose metabolites yet to be discovered. Besides, HBEs could serve as attractive drug targets for the treatment of notorious Gram-negative bacterial pathogens that are resistant to antibiotics.</p><p>All authors have contributed to writing the manuscript and have approved the final manuscript.</p><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p><p>Not applicable.</p><p>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":10189,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Medicine","volume":"14 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ctm2.70103","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ctm2.70103","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mammalian innate immune system engages germline-encoded pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) to sense the agonists from invading organisms to discriminate ‘self’ and ‘nonself’.1 Those agonists are usually large molecular signatures termed pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs), such as bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and fungal β-glucan recognized by toll-like receptor 4 or dectin-1, respectively.2, 3 Notably, several recent works revealed that, besides the molecular patterns, specific small molecules can also act as agonists that elicit innate immune responses efficiently.4 Several β-d-manno-heptose metabolites involved in the biosynthesis of LPSs have been identified as small molecule agonists that can be recognized by host alpha-protein kinase 1 (ALPK1), with ADP-d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptose (ADP-heptose) and its C-6′′ epimer as the most potent ones.5 Upon binding to ADP-heptose, ALPK1 will undergo conformational changes to phosphorylate TRAF-interacting protein with forkhead-associated domain (TIFA), and then triggers the activation of Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and inflammation.

ADP-heptose is synthesized from d-sedoheptulose 7-phosphate (S7P) via a four-step relay catalyzed by NDP-heptose biosynthetic enzymes (HBEs) with isomerase, kinase, phosphatase, and nucleotidyltransferase activities (Figure 1). Three types of HBEs with nucleotidyltransferase (HENase) activities were identified, including monodomain nucleotidyltransferase, didomain kinase/nucleotidyltransferase, and tridomain isomerase/kinase/nucleotidyltransferase.6 Before our work, knowledge of HBEs is limited to bacteria. We expanded the understanding of HBEs repertoire beyond the territory of bacteria to viruses, archaea, and eukaryotes.7 Enzymatic characterization of HBEs from different kingdoms verified that all of them could synthesize ADP-heptose and some HENases could also recognize CTP and UTP to generate two new heptose metabolites, CDP-d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptose (CDP-heptose) and UDP-d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptose (UDP-heptose). Systematic evaluation of the NTP substrate scopes of HENases identified a conserved (F/L)XXGRSTT motif (STTR5) as a hallmark of HENases with high NTP substrate promiscuity (Figure 1). The fifth arginine residue of the STTR5 motif may stabilize NTP in a reactive conformation by contributing cation-π interaction with its nucleotide base and hydrogen bonds with its phosphate groups, thereby enabling the HENases to take different NTPs to produce not only ADP-heptose but also CDP- and/or UDP-heptoses. STTR5 could be found in all three types of HENases occurring in bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, suggesting that ADP-, CDP-. and UDP-heptoses could be synthesized by a variety of organisms. The cellular levels of different NDP-heptoses were detected in two representative pathogenic Burkholderia strains, revealing that all of the three NDP-heptoses were accumulated to considerable amounts.7

A comparison of the crystal structures of ALPK1-CDP-heptose and ALPK1-ADP-heptose complexes with the predicted structure of the ALPK1-UDP-heptose complex revealed a common binding pattern of these molecules. Not surprisingly, CDP- and UDP-heptoses are also potent agonists that can activate the kinase activity of ALPK1 and drive it to phosphorylate TIFA with similar efficiencies as ADP-heptose in vitro. While, tests in human and mouse cells showed that CDP- or UDP-heptose can trigger much stronger ALPK1-dependent innate immune responses than ADP-heptose, which was also observed in the in vivo assays of mice. Further investigation showed that similar performances were observed when electroporation of ADP-, CDP-, or UDP-heptose into 293 T cells, indicating a potential difference in the delivery efficiencies of the three metabolites into the host cells.7 The results raised interesting questions as that, for the ALPK1-mediated immune responses elicited by organisms like Burkholderia, which of the three NDP-heptoses is the most important agonist? Can we modulate the host's innate immunity by controlling the production of different NDP heptoses?

Analysis of the distribution of ALPK1 and TIFA homologs revealed a limited occurrence in vertebrates (Figure 1). In contrast, HBEs are widely distributed in bacteria, archaea, viruses, and some simple eukaryotes belonging to Protostomia, which implies that, after deuterostomes lost the ability to synthesize NDP-heptose, some vertebrates evolved a signalling pathway using ALPK1 as the receptor to discriminate ‘themselves’ from numerous NDP-heptose producers. ALPK1s from fishes, amphibians, birds, and mammals exhibited comparable efficiencies in activating the ALPK1-TIFA-NF-κB signalling cascade, indicating this immunity axis is quite conservative. Unlike PAMPs or MAMPs that are “molecular patterns” specific to certain groups of microorganisms, small molecule agonists like NDP-heptose can be produced by organisms from different kingdoms, including microorganisms, plants (Dinophytes), and animals (Arthropoda, Mollusca, etc.), which enables the host to efficiently sense varied invaders via a common innate immunity receptor. The evolutionary relationship between HBEs and ALPK1s may offer a fresh perspective on how to search for other small-molecule immune agonists and their PRRs.

The widespread occurrence of HBEs indicated that heptoses may play more biological roles than what we have known to date, especially in their producers. Actually, there are only limited studies to show that manno-heptose can participate in the installation of cell wall components (e.g. LPSs and capsular polysaccharides), the post-translational heptosylation of certain proteins, and the biosynthesis of natural products (e.g., septacidin) in bacteria.8-10 It was suggested that archaea Methanococcus maripaludis S2 possesses the ability to synthesize ADP-heptose, but the reason why archaea tend to produce manno-heptose remains elusive. The same questions are also unsolved in the HBE-containing plants, animals, and viruses. Moreover, in addition to ADP-heptose, a lot of the HBEs are capable of synthesizing CDP- and UDP-heptoses, while few works have been done to understand the physiological roles of the newly discovered NDP-heptoses. Analysis of the conserved genes adjacent to the HBE-encoding genes may offer some hints about their physiological functions in bacteria, which tend to cluster functional related genes together. Knowledge from bacteria may provide some clues for tracking the roles of manno-heptose in the other kingdoms.

Furthermore, considering the large amounts and significant diversity of HBEs, this group of enzymes deserve to be investigated deeply. There may be other manno-heptose metabolites yet to be discovered. Besides, HBEs could serve as attractive drug targets for the treatment of notorious Gram-negative bacterial pathogens that are resistant to antibiotics.

All authors have contributed to writing the manuscript and have approved the final manuscript.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NDP-β-d-manno-heptoses 是脊椎动物感知的小分子激动剂,可用于区分不同王国的生物。
哺乳动物的先天性免疫系统利用种系编码的模式识别受体(PRR)来感知入侵生物体的激动剂,从而区分 "自我 "和 "非我"。1 这些激动剂通常是被称为病原体相关分子模式(PAMPs)或微生物相关分子模式(MAMPs)的大分子信号,如分别由toll样受体4或dectin-1识别的细菌脂多糖(LPS)和真菌β-葡聚糖、3 值得注意的是,最近的一些研究发现,除了分子模式外,特定的小分子也能作为激动剂有效地引起先天性免疫反应。参与 LPSs 生物合成的几种β-d-甘露庚糖代谢物已被确定为可被宿主α-蛋白激酶 1(ALPK1)识别的小分子激动剂,其中 ADP-d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptose (ADP-庚糖)及其 C-6′′ epimer 是最有效的激动剂。与 ADP-庚糖结合后,ALPK1 会发生构象变化,使带有叉头相关结构域(TIFA)的 TRAF 交互蛋白磷酸化,进而引发核因子卡巴 B(NF-κB)的活化和炎症反应。ADP- 庚糖是由具有异构酶、激酶、磷酸酶和核苷酸转移酶活性的 NDP- 庚糖生物合成酶(HBEs)催化,通过四步接力从 7-磷酸双链庚糖(S7P)合成的(图 1)。我们发现了三种具有核苷酸转移酶(HENase)活性的 HBEs,包括单链核苷酸转移酶、双链激酶/核苷酸转移酶和三链异构酶/激酶/核苷酸转移酶。对不同生物界的 HBEs 进行酶学鉴定后发现,所有 HBEs 都能合成 ADP-庚糖,部分 HENases 还能识别 CTP 和 UTP,生成两种新的庚糖代谢物:CDP-d-甘油-β-d-甘露庚糖(CDP-庚糖)和 UDP-d-甘油-β-d-甘露庚糖(UDP-庚糖)。对 HENases 的 NTP 底物范围进行系统评估后发现,一个保守的 (F/L)XXGRSTT 矩阵(STTR5)是 HENases 具有高度 NTP 底物杂合性的标志(图 1)。STTR5 矩阵的第五个精氨酸残基可能通过阳离子与核苷酸碱基的π相互作用以及与核苷酸碱基磷酸基团的氢键作用,将 NTP 稳定在反应性构象中,从而使 HENases 不仅能利用不同的 NTP 生成 ADP-庚糖,还能利用 CDP- 和/或 UDP-庚糖。在细菌、古生物和真核生物中出现的所有三种类型的 HENase 中都能发现 STTR5,这表明 ADP-、CDP- 和 UDP-庚糖可以由多种生物合成。7 ALPK1-CDP-heptose 和 ALPK1-ADP-heptose 复合物的晶体结构与 ALPK1-UDP-heptose 复合物的预测结构进行比较后发现,这些分子具有共同的结合模式。不足为奇的是,CDP- 和 UDP-庚糖也是有效的激动剂,它们能激活 ALPK1 的激酶活性,并以与 ADP-庚糖相似的效率在体外驱动 ALPK1 磷酸化 TIFA。而在人和小鼠细胞中进行的测试表明,CDP-或 UDP-庚糖引发的 ALPK1 依赖性先天性免疫反应要比 ADP-庚糖强得多,这一点在小鼠体内试验中也观察到了。进一步的研究表明,将 ADP-、CDP- 或 UDP-庚糖电穿孔到 293 个 T 细胞中也能观察到类似的表现,这表明这三种代谢物进入宿主细胞的传递效率可能存在差异。我们能否通过控制不同 NDP 庚糖的产生来调节宿主的先天性免疫?对 ALPK1 和 TIFA 同源物的分布进行分析后发现,它们在脊椎动物中的分布十分有限(图 1)。与此相反,HBEs广泛分布于细菌、古生菌、病毒和一些属于原真核细胞的简单真核生物中,这意味着在去古脊椎动物失去合成NDP-庚糖的能力之后,一些脊椎动物进化出了一种以ALPK1为受体的信号通路,从而将 "自己 "与众多NDP-庚糖生产者区分开来。来自鱼类、两栖类、鸟类和哺乳类的 ALPK1 在激活 ALPK1-TIFA-NF-κB 信号级联方面表现出相似的效率,这表明这一免疫轴相当保守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
450
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Medicine (CTM) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to accelerating the translation of preclinical research into clinical applications and fostering communication between basic and clinical scientists. It highlights the clinical potential and application of various fields including biotechnologies, biomaterials, bioengineering, biomarkers, molecular medicine, omics science, bioinformatics, immunology, molecular imaging, drug discovery, regulation, and health policy. With a focus on the bench-to-bedside approach, CTM prioritizes studies and clinical observations that generate hypotheses relevant to patients and diseases, guiding investigations in cellular and molecular medicine. The journal encourages submissions from clinicians, researchers, policymakers, and industry professionals.
期刊最新文献
NDP-β-d-manno-heptoses are small molecule agonists sensed by the vertebrates to discriminate organisms of different kingdoms Oropharyngeal cancer: Lack of human papillomavirus awareness and economic burden in the United States An AMP-activated protein kinase-PGC-1α axis mediates metabolic plasticity in glioblastoma Comprehensive mapping of somatotroph pituitary neuroendocrine tumour heterogeneity using spatial and single-cell transcriptomics Confirmation of previously identified plasma microRNA ratios for breast cancer detection in a nested case-control study within a screening setting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1