Balancing academics and athletics: Examining academic and athletic identity profiles in a large sample of NCAA Division I college athletes.

IF 3.4 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Heliyon Pub Date : 2024-11-01 eCollection Date: 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40075
Mariya A Yukhymenko-Lescroart
{"title":"Balancing academics and athletics: Examining academic and athletic identity profiles in a large sample of NCAA Division I college athletes.","authors":"Mariya A Yukhymenko-Lescroart","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>College athletes balance academic and athletic roles and, as a result, can hold different combinations of academic and athletic identities. The purpose of this study was to identify common identity profiles in a large sample of Division I (elite) college athletes in the U.S. and to examine these profiles on a number of measures in academics and athletics: performance, motivation (e.g., achievement goals, autonomous motivation, competence, interest, effort, value, persistence, passion), satisfaction, and ethical conduct (e.g., cheating, plagiarism, sportspersonship, gamesmanship, aggression). Profiles were derived in Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 1124) and cross-validated with an independent sample in Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 184). Results showed four common identity profiles: (1) <i>fully engaged college athletes</i> with the highest academic and athletic identities, (2) <i>committed athletes</i> with a low academic identity and a high athletic identity, (3) <i>academics-focused college athletes</i> with an average academic identity and a low athletic identity, and (4) <i>academically unengaged athletes</i> with an extremely low academic identity and a low athletic identity. The identity profiles differed significantly across the measures of academic and athletic performance, achievement motivation (mastery, performance, task, and ego goals), satisfaction, and ethical conduct (academic misconduct, homework cheating, plagiarism, test cheating, sportspersonship, gamesmanship, instrumental aggression) in Study 1, as well as autonomous motivation (competence, relatedness, value/usefulness, effort/importance), academic persistence, and athletic passion (harmonious, obsessive) in Study 2. Taken together, findings provided evidence of both the multidimensional nature of college athletes' identities and the heterogeneity of the college athlete population. Overall, these findings point to the importance of concurrent examination of academic and athletic identities as separate yet interrelated dimensions in research studies. This approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of college athletes' experiences and provides a more nuanced perspective on their identity development.</p>","PeriodicalId":12894,"journal":{"name":"Heliyon","volume":"10 21","pages":"e40075"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11570289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heliyon","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

College athletes balance academic and athletic roles and, as a result, can hold different combinations of academic and athletic identities. The purpose of this study was to identify common identity profiles in a large sample of Division I (elite) college athletes in the U.S. and to examine these profiles on a number of measures in academics and athletics: performance, motivation (e.g., achievement goals, autonomous motivation, competence, interest, effort, value, persistence, passion), satisfaction, and ethical conduct (e.g., cheating, plagiarism, sportspersonship, gamesmanship, aggression). Profiles were derived in Study 1 (N = 1124) and cross-validated with an independent sample in Study 2 (N = 184). Results showed four common identity profiles: (1) fully engaged college athletes with the highest academic and athletic identities, (2) committed athletes with a low academic identity and a high athletic identity, (3) academics-focused college athletes with an average academic identity and a low athletic identity, and (4) academically unengaged athletes with an extremely low academic identity and a low athletic identity. The identity profiles differed significantly across the measures of academic and athletic performance, achievement motivation (mastery, performance, task, and ego goals), satisfaction, and ethical conduct (academic misconduct, homework cheating, plagiarism, test cheating, sportspersonship, gamesmanship, instrumental aggression) in Study 1, as well as autonomous motivation (competence, relatedness, value/usefulness, effort/importance), academic persistence, and athletic passion (harmonious, obsessive) in Study 2. Taken together, findings provided evidence of both the multidimensional nature of college athletes' identities and the heterogeneity of the college athlete population. Overall, these findings point to the importance of concurrent examination of academic and athletic identities as separate yet interrelated dimensions in research studies. This approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of college athletes' experiences and provides a more nuanced perspective on their identity development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平衡学术与体育:研究美国国家大学生体育协会(NCAA)一级运动员大样本中的学术和运动身份特征。
大学运动员兼顾学业和体育角色,因此会持有不同的学业和体育身份组合。本研究的目的是在美国第一组(精英)大学生运动员的大样本中找出共同的身份特征,并通过一系列学术和体育方面的测量指标来检验这些特征:成绩、动机(如成就目标、自主动机、能力、兴趣、努力、价值、坚持、激情)、满意度和道德行为(如作弊、剽窃、体育精神、游戏技巧、攻击性)。研究 1(样本数 = 1124)得出了这些特征,并在研究 2(样本数 = 184)中与一个独立样本进行了交叉验证。结果显示了四种常见的身份特征:(1) 全情投入的大学生运动员,具有最高的学术和运动身份特征;(2) 投入的运动员,具有较低的学术身份特征和较高的运动身份特征;(3) 专注于学术的大学生运动员,具有一般的学术身份特征和较低的运动身份特征;(4) 学术不投入的运动员,具有极低的学术身份特征和较低的运动身份特征。在研究 1 中,身份特征在学业和运动表现、成就动机(掌握、表现、任务和自我目标)、满意度和道德行为(学术不端行为、作业作弊、剽窃、考试作弊、体育精神、游戏技巧、工具性攻击)的测量中存在显著差异;在研究 2 中,身份特征在自主动机(能力、相关性、价值/有用性、努力/重要性)、学业坚持性和运动激情(和谐、痴迷)的测量中也存在显著差异。总之,研究结果证明了大学生运动员身份的多维性和大学生运动员群体的异质性。总之,这些研究结果表明,在调查研究中,同时考察学术身份和运动身份这两个独立但又相互关联的维度非常重要。这种方法可以全面了解大学生运动员的经历,并为他们的身份发展提供一个更加细致入微的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heliyon
Heliyon MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
2793
期刊介绍: Heliyon is an all-science, open access journal that is part of the Cell Press family. Any paper reporting scientifically accurate and valuable research, which adheres to accepted ethical and scientific publishing standards, will be considered for publication. Our growing team of dedicated section editors, along with our in-house team, handle your paper and manage the publication process end-to-end, giving your research the editorial support it deserves.
期刊最新文献
The application and impact of artificial intelligence technology in graphic design: A critical interpretive synthesis. Exploring chemical properties of essential oils from citrus peels using green solvent. Botanical origins of honeys from pollen analysis during the main honey flow across agro-ecologies in kelala district, South Wollo, Ethiopia. Seropositivity of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen among hepatitis B surface antigen-negative vaccinated individuals aged 5-12 years in North West Ethiopia. Human exposure to chromite mining pollution, the toxicity mechanism and health impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1