Development of a Tagmentation-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Clinical Assay as an Alternative to Capillary Electrophoresis-Based Sequencing.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1002/mgg3.70035
Wei Cheng David Kuek, Chean Nee Chai, Wei Ming Jason Tham, Alvin Yu Jin Ng, Dilys Shi Ning Lau, Janice Yen Qi Loo, Dan Thu Van, Joanna Kia Min Tan, Chun Kiat Lee, Benedict Yan, Tim Hon Man Chan
{"title":"Development of a Tagmentation-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Clinical Assay as an Alternative to Capillary Electrophoresis-Based Sequencing.","authors":"Wei Cheng David Kuek, Chean Nee Chai, Wei Ming Jason Tham, Alvin Yu Jin Ng, Dilys Shi Ning Lau, Janice Yen Qi Loo, Dan Thu Van, Joanna Kia Min Tan, Chun Kiat Lee, Benedict Yan, Tim Hon Man Chan","doi":"10.1002/mgg3.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology enables sample multiplexing for interrogation of multiple regions of interest (ROI). Leveraging this, together with access to affordable NGS platforms, we explored the practicality of moving capillary electrophoresis (CE), noncapillary electrophoresis and single-gene testing to NGS. In this work, we evaluated the iSeq 100's capacity to validate 89 samples at once.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Genomic DNA was extracted from 89 archival samples of varying specimen types. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was done with in house primers, library preparation with the Nextera XT Library Preparation Kit and cleaning up with paramagnetic beads. The sequencing was performed on one Illumina iSeq 100 flow cell.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With our workflow, 88 out of 89 samples were accurately sequenced with variant alleles identified. One sample of the 88 samples was initially discordant because the primers used were in a heterozygous deletion region. Upon redesigning of primers, the sample proved concordant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The iSeq-Nextera workflow proved accurate. However, variant allele frequencys generated by the Nextera are not precise.</p>","PeriodicalId":18852,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine","volume":"12 11","pages":"e70035"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.70035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology enables sample multiplexing for interrogation of multiple regions of interest (ROI). Leveraging this, together with access to affordable NGS platforms, we explored the practicality of moving capillary electrophoresis (CE), noncapillary electrophoresis and single-gene testing to NGS. In this work, we evaluated the iSeq 100's capacity to validate 89 samples at once.

Methods: Genomic DNA was extracted from 89 archival samples of varying specimen types. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was done with in house primers, library preparation with the Nextera XT Library Preparation Kit and cleaning up with paramagnetic beads. The sequencing was performed on one Illumina iSeq 100 flow cell.

Results: With our workflow, 88 out of 89 samples were accurately sequenced with variant alleles identified. One sample of the 88 samples was initially discordant because the primers used were in a heterozygous deletion region. Upon redesigning of primers, the sample proved concordant.

Conclusions: The iSeq-Nextera workflow proved accurate. However, variant allele frequencys generated by the Nextera are not precise.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发一种基于标记的下一代测序临床分析方法,以替代基于毛细管电泳的测序。
背景:下一代测序(NGS)技术实现了样本复用,可对多个感兴趣区(ROI)进行检测。利用这一点,再加上可以获得价格合理的 NGS 平台,我们探索了将毛细管电泳 (CE)、非毛细管电泳和单基因测试转移到 NGS 的实用性。在这项工作中,我们评估了 iSeq 100 同时验证 89 个样本的能力:从 89 份不同标本类型的档案样本中提取基因组 DNA。使用内部引物进行聚合酶链反应(PCR),使用 Nextera XT 文库制备试剂盒进行文库制备,并使用顺磁珠进行清理。测序在一个Illumina iSeq 100流动池上进行:结果:采用我们的工作流程,89 个样本中有 88 个被准确测序,并鉴定出了变异等位基因。88 个样本中有一个样本最初不一致,原因是所用引物位于杂合缺失区。在重新设计引物后,该样本被证明是一致的:iSeq-Nextera工作流程证明是准确的。然而,Nextera 生成的变异等位基因频率并不精确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of quality research related to the dynamically developing areas of human, molecular and medical genetics. The journal publishes original research articles covering findings in phenotypic, molecular, biological, and genomic aspects of genomic variation, inherited disorders and birth defects. The broad publishing spectrum of Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine includes rare and common disorders from diagnosis to treatment. Examples of appropriate articles include reports of novel disease genes, functional studies of genetic variants, in-depth genotype-phenotype studies, genomic analysis of inherited disorders, molecular diagnostic methods, medical bioinformatics, ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI), and approaches to clinical diagnosis. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine provides a scientific home for next generation sequencing studies of rare and common disorders, which will make research in this fascinating area easily and rapidly accessible to the scientific community. This will serve as the basis for translating next generation sequencing studies into individualized diagnostics and therapeutics, for day-to-day medical care. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine publishes original research articles, reviews, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented.
期刊最新文献
Deciphering Growth Patterns in Korean Children With Sotos Syndrome Through the Development of a Disease-Specific Growth Chart. A Novel Mutation of FOXC1 (P136L) in an Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome Patient With a Systematized Delusion of Jealousy: A Case Report and Literature Review. A Novel Splice Site Variant in COL6A1 Causes Ullrich Congenital Muscular Dystrophy in a Consanguineous Malian Family. SRY+ Derivative X Chromosome in a Female With Apparently Typical Sexual Development. Reclassification of Two MLH1 Variants of Uncertain Significance Utilizing Clinical and Functional Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1