Thromboembolism prophylaxis timing is associated with center mortality in traumatic brain injury: A Trauma Quality Improvement Program retrospective analysis.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000004469
Troy N Coaston, Amulya Vadlakonda, Aricia Shen, Jeffrey Balian, Nam Yong Cho, Peyman Benharash, Galinos Barmparas
{"title":"Thromboembolism prophylaxis timing is associated with center mortality in traumatic brain injury: A Trauma Quality Improvement Program retrospective analysis.","authors":"Troy N Coaston, Amulya Vadlakonda, Aricia Shen, Jeffrey Balian, Nam Yong Cho, Peyman Benharash, Galinos Barmparas","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timing of venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis (VTEPPx) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) is complex given concerns for potential worsening of hemorrhage. While timing of VTEPPx for TBI patients is known to vary at the patient level, to our knowledge, variation at the hospital level and correlation with quality metrics have not been quantified in a cohort of nonneurosurgical patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of the Trauma Quality Improvement database from 2018 to 2021. The primary outcome was variation in VTEPPx timing. This was ascertained by empirical Bayesian methodology using multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included the association of risk-adjusted VTEPPx timing and hospital characteristics such as volume and risk-adjusted mortality, which was assessed through Pearson's correlation coefficient ( r ). Risk-adjusted mortality was similarly calculated using multilevel mixed-effects modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 132,028 patients included in the current study, 38.7% received care at centers in the earliest quartile of VTEPPx timing, classified as Early (others labeled Delayed ). Patients receiving care at Early centers presented with severe TBI at a similar rate to Delayed (17.4% vs. 19.0%; absolute standardized mean difference, 0.04). Early center patients more commonly received unfractionated heparin as opposed to low-molecular-weight heparin compared with Delayed (40.5% vs. 27.6%; absolute standardized mean difference, 0.28). At the center level, 12% of observed variation in VTEPPx was attributable to differential hospital practices. Overall trauma volume ( r = -0.22, p < 0.001) and TBI volume ( r = -0.19, p < 0.001) were inversely associated with risk-adjusted VTEPPx timing. In addition, centers initiating VTEPPx earlier had lower overall ( r = 0.17, p < 0.001) and TBI-related mortality ( r = 0.17, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is significant center-level variation in timing of VTEPPx among TBI patients. Earlier VTEPPx was associated with improved center outcomes overall and among TBI patients, supporting usage of VTEPPx timing as a holistic measure of quality.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"468-475"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004469","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Timing of venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis (VTEPPx) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) is complex given concerns for potential worsening of hemorrhage. While timing of VTEPPx for TBI patients is known to vary at the patient level, to our knowledge, variation at the hospital level and correlation with quality metrics have not been quantified in a cohort of nonneurosurgical patients.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of the Trauma Quality Improvement database from 2018 to 2021. The primary outcome was variation in VTEPPx timing. This was ascertained by empirical Bayesian methodology using multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included the association of risk-adjusted VTEPPx timing and hospital characteristics such as volume and risk-adjusted mortality, which was assessed through Pearson's correlation coefficient ( r ). Risk-adjusted mortality was similarly calculated using multilevel mixed-effects modeling.

Results: Of 132,028 patients included in the current study, 38.7% received care at centers in the earliest quartile of VTEPPx timing, classified as Early (others labeled Delayed ). Patients receiving care at Early centers presented with severe TBI at a similar rate to Delayed (17.4% vs. 19.0%; absolute standardized mean difference, 0.04). Early center patients more commonly received unfractionated heparin as opposed to low-molecular-weight heparin compared with Delayed (40.5% vs. 27.6%; absolute standardized mean difference, 0.28). At the center level, 12% of observed variation in VTEPPx was attributable to differential hospital practices. Overall trauma volume ( r = -0.22, p < 0.001) and TBI volume ( r = -0.19, p < 0.001) were inversely associated with risk-adjusted VTEPPx timing. In addition, centers initiating VTEPPx earlier had lower overall ( r = 0.17, p < 0.001) and TBI-related mortality ( r = 0.17, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: There is significant center-level variation in timing of VTEPPx among TBI patients. Earlier VTEPPx was associated with improved center outcomes overall and among TBI patients, supporting usage of VTEPPx timing as a holistic measure of quality.

Level of evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血栓栓塞预防时机与脑外伤中心死亡率有关:创伤质量改进计划回顾性分析。
背景:脑外伤(TBI)患者静脉血栓栓塞化学预防(VTEPPx)的时机选择非常复杂,因为人们担心出血可能会恶化。众所周知,TBI 患者的 VTEPPx 时间安排在患者层面存在差异,但据我们所知,在非神经外科患者队列中,医院层面的差异以及与质量指标的相关性尚未得到量化:这是一项对 2018 年至 2021 年创伤质量改进数据库的回顾性队列研究。主要结果是 VTEPPx 时间的变化。这是用多层次混合效应逻辑回归的经验贝叶斯方法确定的。次要结果包括风险调整后的 VTEPPx 时间与医院特征(如容量和风险调整后死亡率)之间的关联,该关联通过皮尔逊相关系数 (r) 进行评估。风险调整死亡率同样采用多层次混合效应模型进行计算:在本次研究纳入的 132,028 名患者中,38.7% 的患者在 VTEPPx 时间最早的四分位数中心接受治疗,被归类为早期(其他被归类为延迟)。在早期中心接受治疗的患者出现严重创伤性脑损伤的比例与延迟中心相似(17.4% 对 19.0%;绝对标准化均值差异为 0.04)。与延迟治疗中心相比,早期治疗中心的患者更常接受非分数肝素治疗,而不是低分子量肝素治疗(40.5% 对 27.6%;绝对标准化均值差异为 0.28)。在中心层面,观察到的 VTEPPx 变异中有 12% 可归因于医院的不同做法。总体创伤量(r = -0.22,p < 0.001)和创伤性脑损伤量(r = -0.19,p < 0.001)与风险调整后的 VTEPPx 时间成反比。此外,较早启动VTEPPx的中心总体死亡率(r = 0.17,p < 0.001)和TBI相关死亡率(r = 0.17,p < 0.001)较低:结论:在创伤性脑损伤患者中,VTEPPx的时机在中心层面存在明显差异。结论:创伤性脑损伤患者的 VTEPPx 时间在中心层面存在显著差异,较早进行 VTEPPx 与中心整体和创伤性脑损伤患者的预后改善相关,支持将 VTEPPx 时间作为衡量质量的综合指标:证据级别:预后和流行病学;III 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
期刊最新文献
Emergency Medicaid enrollment after traumatic injury predicts long-term health care utilization. The always evolving diagnosis and management of Clostridioides difficile colitis: What you need to know. Does time to operating room affect outcomes after pediatric blunt hollow viscus injury? A Trauma Quality Improvement Program analysis. Thromboembolism prophylaxis timing is associated with center mortality in traumatic brain injury: A Trauma Quality Improvement Program retrospective analysis. Long-term functional recovery after rib fractures: The impact of frailty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1