Oral Ketamine and Midazolam for Procedural Sedation in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Retrospective Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003291
Jeannine Del Pizzo, Joel A Fein
{"title":"Oral Ketamine and Midazolam for Procedural Sedation in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Jeannine Del Pizzo, Joel A Fein","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Needle-free procedural sedation (PS) is an attractive option for children presenting to the emergency department (ED) who require a painful procedure, as it avoids inflicting additional pain either with intravenous line placement or intramuscular injection. While use of oral (PO) ketamine has been reported in the literature, limited information is available to guide ED-based use in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a descriptive study of the patient experience receiving PS with the following regimen: PO ketamine 6 mg/kg (max of 200 mg) with or without PO midazolam 0.5 mg/kg (max 15 mg) approximately 30 minutes before a procedure. We performed a retrospective chart review of children younger than 18 years receiving this PS regimen at a tertiary care children's hospital ED and an affiliated community hospital ED from January 1 through September 30, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight children were sedated with PO ketamine during the study period. The most common procedure performed was laceration repair (46.5%), followed by incision and drainage (17.3%). All but 2 children received PO midazolam along with PO ketamine. Eight patients received additional medications due to inadequate sedation. Sedation depth was clinician-reported as moderate in 74.1% (43), mild in 15.5% (9), and deep in 10.3% (6). Procedures were completed in 98.3% (57) cases. 93.1% (54) of patients had no adverse event (AE) of any kind and no patient had a significant adverse event (SAE).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>PO ketamine with or without midazolam resulted in procedure completion of a variety of procedures in the pediatric ED with minimal AE, no SAE, and without need for additional sedative medications in 86.2% (50). This regimen is an option for needle-free moderate PS in this setting. Further study is needed to clarify the benefit of the addition of midazolam to PO ketamine, rates of AE and SAE, sedation duration, and recovery times.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Needle-free procedural sedation (PS) is an attractive option for children presenting to the emergency department (ED) who require a painful procedure, as it avoids inflicting additional pain either with intravenous line placement or intramuscular injection. While use of oral (PO) ketamine has been reported in the literature, limited information is available to guide ED-based use in children.

Methods: This is a descriptive study of the patient experience receiving PS with the following regimen: PO ketamine 6 mg/kg (max of 200 mg) with or without PO midazolam 0.5 mg/kg (max 15 mg) approximately 30 minutes before a procedure. We performed a retrospective chart review of children younger than 18 years receiving this PS regimen at a tertiary care children's hospital ED and an affiliated community hospital ED from January 1 through September 30, 2023.

Results: Fifty-eight children were sedated with PO ketamine during the study period. The most common procedure performed was laceration repair (46.5%), followed by incision and drainage (17.3%). All but 2 children received PO midazolam along with PO ketamine. Eight patients received additional medications due to inadequate sedation. Sedation depth was clinician-reported as moderate in 74.1% (43), mild in 15.5% (9), and deep in 10.3% (6). Procedures were completed in 98.3% (57) cases. 93.1% (54) of patients had no adverse event (AE) of any kind and no patient had a significant adverse event (SAE).

Discussion: PO ketamine with or without midazolam resulted in procedure completion of a variety of procedures in the pediatric ED with minimal AE, no SAE, and without need for additional sedative medications in 86.2% (50). This regimen is an option for needle-free moderate PS in this setting. Further study is needed to clarify the benefit of the addition of midazolam to PO ketamine, rates of AE and SAE, sedation duration, and recovery times.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在儿科急诊室口服氯胺酮和咪达唑仑进行手术镇静:回顾性研究
导言:对于急诊科(ED)需要进行疼痛手术的儿童来说,无针程序镇静(PS)是一种很有吸引力的选择,因为它可以避免因静脉置管或肌肉注射而造成额外的疼痛。虽然已有文献报道了口服氯胺酮的使用情况,但用于指导急诊科在儿童中使用氯胺酮的信息非常有限:这是一项描述性研究,研究对象是接受 PS 的患者,采用的治疗方案如下:方法:这是一项描述性研究,患者在接受 PS 时会有以下体验:在手术前约 30 分钟服用或不服用 PO Midazolam 0.5 毫克/千克(最大剂量 15 毫克), PO 氯胺酮 6 毫克/千克(最大剂量 200 毫克)。我们对一家三级儿童医院急诊室和一家附属社区医院急诊室在 2023 年 1 月 1 日至 9 月 30 日期间接受这种 PS 方案治疗的 18 岁以下儿童进行了回顾性病历审查:研究期间,58 名儿童接受了氯胺酮镇静剂治疗。最常见的手术是裂伤修补术(46.5%),其次是切开引流术(17.3%)。除两名患儿外,其他患儿在服用氯胺酮的同时还服用了咪达唑仑。八名患者因镇静不足而接受了额外的药物治疗。据临床医生报告,镇静深度为中度的占 74.1%(43 例),轻度的占 15.5%(9 例),深度的占 10.3%(6 例)。98.3%(57 例)的患者完成了手术。93.1%(54 例)的患者未发生任何不良事件(AE),没有患者发生重大不良事件(SAE):讨论:在儿科急诊室使用氯胺酮(无论是否使用咪达唑仑)完成各种手术后,86.2%(50 例)的患者发生了极少的 AE,无 SAE,且无需额外使用镇静药物。在这种情况下,该方案可用于无针中度 PS。需要进一步研究以明确在 PO 氯胺酮中添加咪达唑仑的益处、AE 和 SAE 发生率、镇静持续时间和恢复时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
期刊最新文献
Development of a Scoring Model to Predict Severe Dengue in Children at Admission in the Emergency Care: An Observational Study. Minor Head Trauma in Children Younger Than 3 Months and Clinical Predictors of Clinically Important Traumatic Brain Injuries. Oral Ketamine and Midazolam for Procedural Sedation in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Retrospective Study. The National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale and Perceived Staff Workload: Evidence for Construct Validity in a Pediatric Setting. Presence of Sonographic Secondary Signs Without Visualization of Appendix Is Indicative of Appendicitis in Children Younger Than 5 Years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1