Validation of the Nepali version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Self-Report.

IF 0.7 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spinal Cord Series and Cases Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1038/s41394-024-00687-6
Prakriti Khatri, Anjita Khadka, Jatuporn Suttiwong
{"title":"Validation of the Nepali version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Self-Report.","authors":"Prakriti Khatri, Anjita Khadka, Jatuporn Suttiwong","doi":"10.1038/s41394-024-00687-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A methodological study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To establish the criterion-related validity of the Nepali version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Self-Report (SCIM-SR).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient Department of the Spinal Injury Rehabilitation Center and community of Province no. 3, Nepal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Community-dwelling individuals with spinal cord injury were enrolled. Participants self-administered the Nepali version of the SCIM-SR while a clinician concurrently administered the SCIM III. Descriptive statistics characterized the sample, while Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and Intraclass correlation coefficient assessed the association between the SCIM III and the Nepali version of the SCIM-SR. Bland Altman's analysis determined the differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for the total score was 0.961, self-care subscale was 0.590, respiration and sphincter management subscale was 0.897, and mobility subscale was 0.891. The ICC (2,1) and confidence interval for the total score, self-care subscale, respiration and sphincter management subscale, and mobility subscale were 0.989 (0.983-0.993), 0.873 (0.804-0.918), 0.955 (0.931-0.971) and 0.991 (0.987-0.994), respectively. The SCIM-SR scores were lower than the SCIM III in total and all subscale scores. The Bland-Altman's difference for the total score, self-care subscale, respiration and sphincter management subscale, and mobility subscale were 2.55, 1.34, 0.83, and 0.38, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Nepali version of the SCIM-SR was validated and can be used to evaluate the functional status of individuals with spinal cord injury in the community setting of Nepal.</p>","PeriodicalId":22079,"journal":{"name":"Spinal Cord Series and Cases","volume":"10 1","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574137/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal Cord Series and Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-024-00687-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: A methodological study.

Objectives: To establish the criterion-related validity of the Nepali version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Self-Report (SCIM-SR).

Setting: Outpatient Department of the Spinal Injury Rehabilitation Center and community of Province no. 3, Nepal.

Methods: Community-dwelling individuals with spinal cord injury were enrolled. Participants self-administered the Nepali version of the SCIM-SR while a clinician concurrently administered the SCIM III. Descriptive statistics characterized the sample, while Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and Intraclass correlation coefficient assessed the association between the SCIM III and the Nepali version of the SCIM-SR. Bland Altman's analysis determined the differences.

Results: The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for the total score was 0.961, self-care subscale was 0.590, respiration and sphincter management subscale was 0.897, and mobility subscale was 0.891. The ICC (2,1) and confidence interval for the total score, self-care subscale, respiration and sphincter management subscale, and mobility subscale were 0.989 (0.983-0.993), 0.873 (0.804-0.918), 0.955 (0.931-0.971) and 0.991 (0.987-0.994), respectively. The SCIM-SR scores were lower than the SCIM III in total and all subscale scores. The Bland-Altman's difference for the total score, self-care subscale, respiration and sphincter management subscale, and mobility subscale were 2.55, 1.34, 0.83, and 0.38, respectively.

Conclusions: The Nepali version of the SCIM-SR was validated and can be used to evaluate the functional status of individuals with spinal cord injury in the community setting of Nepal.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼泊尔语版脊髓独立性测量自我报告的验证。
研究设计方法研究:确定尼泊尔版脊髓独立性测量自我报告(SCIM-SR)的标准相关有效性:地点:尼泊尔第 3 省脊柱损伤康复中心门诊部和社区。地点:尼泊尔第 3 省脊髓损伤康复中心门诊部和社区:方法:招募居住在社区的脊髓损伤患者。参与者自行填写尼泊尔语版的 SCIM-SR,同时由一名临床医生填写 SCIM III。描述性统计描述了样本的特征,斯皮尔曼等级相关系数和类内相关系数评估了 SCIM III 与尼泊尔版 SCIM-SR 之间的关联。布兰德-阿尔特曼分析确定了差异:总分的斯皮尔曼等级相关系数为 0.961,自我护理分量表为 0.590,呼吸和括约肌管理分量表为 0.897,活动能力分量表为 0.891。总分、自我护理分量表、呼吸和括约肌管理分量表以及活动能力分量表的 ICC (2,1) 和置信区间分别为 0.989 (0.983-0.993)、0.873 (0.804-0.918)、0.955 (0.931-0.971) 和 0.991 (0.987-0.994)。SCIM-SR 的总分和所有分量表得分均低于 SCIM III。总分、自理能力分量表、呼吸和括约肌管理分量表以及活动能力分量表的布兰-阿尔特曼差异分别为 2.55、1.34、0.83 和 0.38:尼泊尔版 SCIM-SR 已通过验证,可用于评估尼泊尔社区脊髓损伤患者的功能状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spinal Cord Series and Cases
Spinal Cord Series and Cases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
92
期刊最新文献
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the "impact on participation and autonomy" (IPA) questionnaire in Indian population with spinal cord injury. Combined nerve and tendon transfer strategy for the restoration of grasp in tetraplegia; a case report. Immediate effect of alone and combined virtual reality, gait-like muscle vibration and transcranial direct current stimulation on neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Improving quality of care in traumatic spinal column/spinal cord injuries (TSC/SCI) in Iran: a policy brief. Improving the rehabilitation of individuals admitted to England's National Spinal Injuries Centre with traumatic brain injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1