Cell type-specific weighting-factors to solve solid organs-specific limitations of single cell RNA-sequencing.

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY PLoS Genetics Pub Date : 2024-11-18 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1011436
Kengo Tejima, Satoshi Kozawa, Thomas N Sato
{"title":"Cell type-specific weighting-factors to solve solid organs-specific limitations of single cell RNA-sequencing.","authors":"Kengo Tejima, Satoshi Kozawa, Thomas N Sato","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgen.1011436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a popular method to analyze gene expression and cellular composition at single-cell resolution, it harbors shortcomings: The failure to account for cell-to-cell variations of transcriptome-size (i.e., the total number of transcripts per cell) and also cell dissociation/processing-induced cryptic gene expression. This is particularly a problem when analyzing highly heterogeneous solid tissues/organs, which requires cell dissociation for the analysis. As a result, there exists a discrepancy between bulk RNA-seq result and virtually reconstituted bulk RNA-seq result using its composite scRNA-seq data. To fix this problem, we propose a computationally calculated coefficient, \"cell type-specific weighting-factor (cWF)\". Here, we introduce a concept and a method of its computation and report cWFs for 76 cell-types across 10 solid organs. Their fidelity is validated by more accurate reconstitution and deconvolution of bulk RNA-seq data of diverse solid organs using the scRNA-seq data and the cWFs of their composite cells. Furthermore, we also show that cWFs effectively predict aging-progression, implicating their diagnostic applications and also their association with aging mechanism. Our study provides an important method to solve critical limitations of scRNA-seq analysis of complex solid tissues/organs. Furthermore, our findings suggest a diagnostic utility and biological significance of cWFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49007,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Genetics","volume":"20 11","pages":"e1011436"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573148/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a popular method to analyze gene expression and cellular composition at single-cell resolution, it harbors shortcomings: The failure to account for cell-to-cell variations of transcriptome-size (i.e., the total number of transcripts per cell) and also cell dissociation/processing-induced cryptic gene expression. This is particularly a problem when analyzing highly heterogeneous solid tissues/organs, which requires cell dissociation for the analysis. As a result, there exists a discrepancy between bulk RNA-seq result and virtually reconstituted bulk RNA-seq result using its composite scRNA-seq data. To fix this problem, we propose a computationally calculated coefficient, "cell type-specific weighting-factor (cWF)". Here, we introduce a concept and a method of its computation and report cWFs for 76 cell-types across 10 solid organs. Their fidelity is validated by more accurate reconstitution and deconvolution of bulk RNA-seq data of diverse solid organs using the scRNA-seq data and the cWFs of their composite cells. Furthermore, we also show that cWFs effectively predict aging-progression, implicating their diagnostic applications and also their association with aging mechanism. Our study provides an important method to solve critical limitations of scRNA-seq analysis of complex solid tissues/organs. Furthermore, our findings suggest a diagnostic utility and biological significance of cWFs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对细胞类型的权重因子,解决单细胞 RNA 测序在实体器官方面的局限性。
单细胞 RNA 测序(scRNA-seq)是一种常用的以单细胞分辨率分析基因表达和细胞组成的方法,但它也有不足之处:它无法解释细胞间转录组大小(即每个细胞的转录本总数)的变化,也无法解释细胞解离/加工引起的隐性基因表达。在分析高度异质性的实体组织/器官时,这尤其是一个问题,因为分析需要细胞解离。因此,体RNA-seq结果与使用其复合scRNA-seq数据几乎重建的体RNA-seq结果之间存在差异。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种通过计算得出的系数--"细胞类型特异性加权因子(cWF)"。在此,我们介绍了这一概念及其计算方法,并报告了 10 个实体器官 76 种细胞类型的 cWF。通过使用 scRNA-seq 数据及其复合细胞的 cWFs 对不同实体器官的大量 RNA-seq 数据进行更精确的重组和去卷积,验证了它们的真实性。此外,我们还证明了 cWFs 能有效预测衰老进程,这意味着它们在诊断方面的应用以及它们与衰老机制的关联。我们的研究为解决复杂实体组织/器官 scRNA-seq 分析的关键局限性提供了一种重要方法。此外,我们的研究结果还表明了 cWFs 的诊断用途和生物学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS Genetics
PLoS Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
自引率
2.20%
发文量
438
期刊介绍: PLOS Genetics is run by an international Editorial Board, headed by the Editors-in-Chief, Greg Barsh (HudsonAlpha Institute of Biotechnology, and Stanford University School of Medicine) and Greg Copenhaver (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). Articles published in PLOS Genetics are archived in PubMed Central and cited in PubMed.
期刊最新文献
A high-resolution haplotype collection uncovers somatic hybridization, recombination and intercontinental movement in oat crown rust. Protein phosphatase 1 catalytic subunit gamma is a causative gene for meat lightness and redness. A novel statistical framework for meta-analysis of total mediation effect with high-dimensional omics mediators in large-scale genomic consortia. Cell non-autonomous signaling through the conserved C. elegans glycoprotein hormone receptor FSHR-1 regulates cholinergic neurotransmission. Neuronal fatty acid-binding protein enhances autophagy and suppresses amyloid-β pathology in a Drosophila model of Alzheimer's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1