An Institutional Experience of Core Needle Biopsy with Cooperative Implementation by Pathologists and Head and Neck Oncologists in Salivary Gland Carcinoma.
Kenya Kobayashi, Seiichi Yoshimoto, Go Omura, Yoshifumi Matsumoto, Azusa Sakai, Kohtaro Eguchi, Toshihiko Sakai, Yoshitaka Honma, Fumihiko Matsumoto, Masahito Kawazu, Yuki Saito, Eigitsu Ryo, Akihiko Yoshida, Yasushi Yatabe, Taisuke Mori
{"title":"An Institutional Experience of Core Needle Biopsy with Cooperative Implementation by Pathologists and Head and Neck Oncologists in Salivary Gland Carcinoma.","authors":"Kenya Kobayashi, Seiichi Yoshimoto, Go Omura, Yoshifumi Matsumoto, Azusa Sakai, Kohtaro Eguchi, Toshihiko Sakai, Yoshitaka Honma, Fumihiko Matsumoto, Masahito Kawazu, Yuki Saito, Eigitsu Ryo, Akihiko Yoshida, Yasushi Yatabe, Taisuke Mori","doi":"10.1007/s12105-024-01725-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A major problem in establishing treatment strategies for salivary gland carcinomas is the difficulty of preoperative histologic subtyping. Core needle biopsy (CNB) allows the collection of a small, intact specimens from the tumor center for detailed analysis. We evaluated the efficacy and limitations of preoperative diagnosis with CNB specimens collected using a newly developed 20-gauge needle designed to popularize its use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paired preoperative CNB and surgical specimens from 41 patients with malignant salivary gland tumors were retrospectively reviewed. A histologic typing platform, including morphologic and immunohistochemical evaluation and fluorescence in situ hybridization, was evaluated using CNB specimens. Biopsy specimen quality, diagnostic accuracy, and immunohistochemistry concordance rates between biopsy and surgical specimens were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 39 of the 41 patients, CNB provided high-quality specimens, enabling adequate morphologic, immunohistologic, and genomic analyses. In two patients, high-quality CNB specimens could not be obtained due to cystic fluid and tumor firmness. The overall accuracy of correct preoperative diagnosis was 75%. The success rate of histologic subtyping and HER2 immunostaining concordance between CNB and surgical specimens was lower in carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma (CXPA) than in de novo carcinoma (histologic subtyping; CXPA vs de novo carcinoma 50% vs 89%, p = 0.016, HER2 concordance; salivary duct carcinoma [SDC] ex-PA vs de novo SDC 16% vs 100%, p = 4.66E-03). No recurrence occurred due to tumor seeding after CNB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Highly accurate histologic subtyping of salivary gland carcinomas can be performed by preoperative CNB; however, specificity can be more challenging in pathologically heterogenous tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":47972,"journal":{"name":"Head & Neck Pathology","volume":"18 1","pages":"122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Neck Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-024-01725-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: A major problem in establishing treatment strategies for salivary gland carcinomas is the difficulty of preoperative histologic subtyping. Core needle biopsy (CNB) allows the collection of a small, intact specimens from the tumor center for detailed analysis. We evaluated the efficacy and limitations of preoperative diagnosis with CNB specimens collected using a newly developed 20-gauge needle designed to popularize its use.
Methods: Paired preoperative CNB and surgical specimens from 41 patients with malignant salivary gland tumors were retrospectively reviewed. A histologic typing platform, including morphologic and immunohistochemical evaluation and fluorescence in situ hybridization, was evaluated using CNB specimens. Biopsy specimen quality, diagnostic accuracy, and immunohistochemistry concordance rates between biopsy and surgical specimens were analyzed.
Results: In 39 of the 41 patients, CNB provided high-quality specimens, enabling adequate morphologic, immunohistologic, and genomic analyses. In two patients, high-quality CNB specimens could not be obtained due to cystic fluid and tumor firmness. The overall accuracy of correct preoperative diagnosis was 75%. The success rate of histologic subtyping and HER2 immunostaining concordance between CNB and surgical specimens was lower in carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma (CXPA) than in de novo carcinoma (histologic subtyping; CXPA vs de novo carcinoma 50% vs 89%, p = 0.016, HER2 concordance; salivary duct carcinoma [SDC] ex-PA vs de novo SDC 16% vs 100%, p = 4.66E-03). No recurrence occurred due to tumor seeding after CNB.
Conclusions: Highly accurate histologic subtyping of salivary gland carcinomas can be performed by preoperative CNB; however, specificity can be more challenging in pathologically heterogenous tumors.
期刊介绍:
Head & Neck Pathology presents scholarly papers, reviews and symposia that cover the spectrum of human surgical pathology within the anatomic zones of the oral cavity, sinonasal tract, larynx, hypopharynx, salivary gland, ear and temporal bone, and neck.
The journal publishes rapid developments in new diagnostic criteria, intraoperative consultation, immunohistochemical studies, molecular techniques, genetic analyses, diagnostic aids, experimental pathology, cytology, radiographic imaging, and application of uniform terminology to allow practitioners to continue to maintain and expand their knowledge in the subspecialty of head and neck pathology. Coverage of practical application to daily clinical practice is supported with proceedings and symposia from international societies and academies devoted to this field.
Single-blind peer review
The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.