{"title":"Ossicular Reconstruction with TORP: Does Malleus has a Role?","authors":"Bhanu Bhardwaj, Arvinder Singh Sood, Jaskaran Singh, Divya Parkash, Sania Seth, Harmanjot Singh Kalra","doi":"10.1007/s12070-024-05086-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Malleus has a catenary lever mechanism in sound transmission in a normal ear leading to better acoustic signal at the footplate. However, the literature is rife with controversy regarding its role in ears where hearing has been restored using a prosthesis. Though the presence of malleus has prevented lateralization of graft in reconstructed middle ear, consensus on role of malleus on outcomes of ossiculoplasty malleus is still unclear. It's a prospective longitudinal study with 60 patients randomised into two groups. Both the groups had reconstruction done with TORP. In one group malleus was preserved (M +)and placed over the TORP using malleus relocation technique while in another group malleus was intentionally removed(M -). Both the groups were compared for Improvement in hearing, AB gap and stability of the implant. Age group more than 40 years was most affected in both groups followed by age group between 15 and 30 years. There was equal incidence of males and females in (M -) group and Incidence of Females was 60 percent versus 40 percent males in (M +) group. Preoperative PTA of moderate conductive hearing loss (40-55db) was most found followed by severe conductive hearing loss (> 55db) with standard deviation of 7.155 and mean hearing loss was 46.30db in (M +) group. Post operative pure tone averages improved to mild hearing loss (26-30db) in about 90percent of patients with mean of 32db and standard deviation of 7.06 in (M +) group Preoperative PTA of severe conductive hearing loss (> 55 db.) was most found followed by moderate conductive hearing loss (45-55db)with standard deviation of 6.471 and mean hearing loss was 47 db in (M-)group.Post operative pure tone averages improved to mild hearing loss (26-30 db.) in about 90 percent of patients with mean of 33 db and standard deviation of 5.431 in (M -) group. The average reduction in AB gap in (M +) was 22.61db with std deviation of 0.08 while in (M-) it was 17.61 with std deviation of 2.0.). The difference for improvement in hearing between both the groups was not statistically significant. The intergroup reduction in AB gap was also statistically insignificant. The extrusion was seen in 1 case in (M +) and 6 cases in (M-). This difference between both the groups was statistically significant. If malleus is used by an otologist to stabilize the implant its role becomes significant in long term outcomes of ossiculoplasty, however it doesn't contribute as far as hearing improvement or reduction AB gap is concerned.</p>","PeriodicalId":49190,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","volume":"76 6","pages":"5750-5756"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-024-05086-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Malleus has a catenary lever mechanism in sound transmission in a normal ear leading to better acoustic signal at the footplate. However, the literature is rife with controversy regarding its role in ears where hearing has been restored using a prosthesis. Though the presence of malleus has prevented lateralization of graft in reconstructed middle ear, consensus on role of malleus on outcomes of ossiculoplasty malleus is still unclear. It's a prospective longitudinal study with 60 patients randomised into two groups. Both the groups had reconstruction done with TORP. In one group malleus was preserved (M +)and placed over the TORP using malleus relocation technique while in another group malleus was intentionally removed(M -). Both the groups were compared for Improvement in hearing, AB gap and stability of the implant. Age group more than 40 years was most affected in both groups followed by age group between 15 and 30 years. There was equal incidence of males and females in (M -) group and Incidence of Females was 60 percent versus 40 percent males in (M +) group. Preoperative PTA of moderate conductive hearing loss (40-55db) was most found followed by severe conductive hearing loss (> 55db) with standard deviation of 7.155 and mean hearing loss was 46.30db in (M +) group. Post operative pure tone averages improved to mild hearing loss (26-30db) in about 90percent of patients with mean of 32db and standard deviation of 7.06 in (M +) group Preoperative PTA of severe conductive hearing loss (> 55 db.) was most found followed by moderate conductive hearing loss (45-55db)with standard deviation of 6.471 and mean hearing loss was 47 db in (M-)group.Post operative pure tone averages improved to mild hearing loss (26-30 db.) in about 90 percent of patients with mean of 33 db and standard deviation of 5.431 in (M -) group. The average reduction in AB gap in (M +) was 22.61db with std deviation of 0.08 while in (M-) it was 17.61 with std deviation of 2.0.). The difference for improvement in hearing between both the groups was not statistically significant. The intergroup reduction in AB gap was also statistically insignificant. The extrusion was seen in 1 case in (M +) and 6 cases in (M-). This difference between both the groups was statistically significant. If malleus is used by an otologist to stabilize the implant its role becomes significant in long term outcomes of ossiculoplasty, however it doesn't contribute as far as hearing improvement or reduction AB gap is concerned.
期刊介绍:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery was founded as Indian Journal of Otolaryngology in 1949 as a scientific Journal published by the Association of Otolaryngologists of India and was later rechristened as IJOHNS to incorporate the changes and progress.
IJOHNS, undoubtedly one of the oldest Journals in India, is the official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India and is about to publish it is 67th Volume in 2015. The Journal published quarterly accepts articles in general Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and various subspecialities such as Otology, Rhinology, Laryngology and Phonosurgery, Neurotology, Head and Neck Surgery etc.
The Journal acts as a window to showcase and project the clinical and research work done by Otolaryngologists community in India and around the world. It is a continued source of useful clinical information with peer review by eminent Otolaryngologists of repute in their respective fields. The Journal accepts articles pertaining to clinical reports, Clinical studies, Research articles in basic and applied Otolaryngology, short Communications, Clinical records reporting unusual presentations or lesions and new surgical techniques. The journal acts as a catalyst and mirrors the Indian Otolaryngologist’s active interests and pursuits. The Journal also invites articles from senior and experienced authors on interesting topics in Otolaryngology and allied sciences from all over the world.
The print version is distributed free to about 4000 members of Association of Otolaryngologists of India and the e-Journal shortly going to make its appearance on the Springer Board can be accessed by all the members.
Association of Otolaryngologists of India and M/s Springer India group have come together to co-publish IJOHNS from January 2007 and this bondage is going to provide an impetus to the Journal in terms of international presence and global exposure.