Evaluating risks, monitoring cannabis use, and planning to get home safely: Exploring self-regulation processes associated with cannabis use and driving.

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Traffic Injury Prevention Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1080/15389588.2024.2413442
Paweena Sukhawathanakul, Jie Li, Alejandra Contreras, Otis Geddes, Myles Maillet
{"title":"Evaluating risks, monitoring cannabis use, and planning to get home safely: Exploring self-regulation processes associated with cannabis use and driving.","authors":"Paweena Sukhawathanakul, Jie Li, Alejandra Contreras, Otis Geddes, Myles Maillet","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2024.2413442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Preventing Cannabis-impaired driving involves understanding how users assess risk, monitor their use, and plan to get home safely. While extant research has shown substantial heterogeneity in patterns of cannabis use among different user groups, far less research has examined self-regulation among users. The current study aims to identify sub-groups of individuals who used or have used cannabis based on how they perceive risks, monitor their impairment, and plan to avoid driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC) to examine how the different profiles relate to DUIC outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were a Canadian sub-sample in the province of British Columbia who participated in the 2022 International Cannabis Policy study and reported ever using or currently using cannabis (<i>N</i> = 886, M<sub>age</sub> = 43.58, SD<sub>age</sub> = 13.67; 63% female). Risk perception, impairment monitoring, planning ability, DUIC-related behaviors, Cannabis use and related problems were assessed through an online self-reported survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Latent profile analysis identified three groups of self-regulators based on their level of risk perception, monitoring, and plan to avoid DUI. The majority (51%) of participants showed moderate self-regulation with average levels of risk perception, monitoring, and planning. A \"highly self-regulated\" group (20%) had the highest risk perception, monitoring, and planning. A \"low self-regulated\" group (29%) had the lowest risk perception, less confidence in monitoring, and lower DUI planning. There were significant differences between the profiles and DUIC outcomes. Cannabis users (including both historical and current users) with high self-regulation were less likely to be passengers of drivers under the influence and more likely to intervene to stop friends from driving while impaired, compared to those with low or moderate self-regulation. However, there were no profile differences in reports of having ever driven under the influence of cannabis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences in risk perception, monitoring, and planning are associated with self-regulatory abilities. Understanding diverse self-regulation patterns among people who have used cannabis can help identify and mitigate risky behaviors, including DUI.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2024.2413442","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Preventing Cannabis-impaired driving involves understanding how users assess risk, monitor their use, and plan to get home safely. While extant research has shown substantial heterogeneity in patterns of cannabis use among different user groups, far less research has examined self-regulation among users. The current study aims to identify sub-groups of individuals who used or have used cannabis based on how they perceive risks, monitor their impairment, and plan to avoid driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC) to examine how the different profiles relate to DUIC outcomes.

Methods: Participants were a Canadian sub-sample in the province of British Columbia who participated in the 2022 International Cannabis Policy study and reported ever using or currently using cannabis (N = 886, Mage = 43.58, SDage = 13.67; 63% female). Risk perception, impairment monitoring, planning ability, DUIC-related behaviors, Cannabis use and related problems were assessed through an online self-reported survey.

Results: Latent profile analysis identified three groups of self-regulators based on their level of risk perception, monitoring, and plan to avoid DUI. The majority (51%) of participants showed moderate self-regulation with average levels of risk perception, monitoring, and planning. A "highly self-regulated" group (20%) had the highest risk perception, monitoring, and planning. A "low self-regulated" group (29%) had the lowest risk perception, less confidence in monitoring, and lower DUI planning. There were significant differences between the profiles and DUIC outcomes. Cannabis users (including both historical and current users) with high self-regulation were less likely to be passengers of drivers under the influence and more likely to intervene to stop friends from driving while impaired, compared to those with low or moderate self-regulation. However, there were no profile differences in reports of having ever driven under the influence of cannabis.

Conclusions: Differences in risk perception, monitoring, and planning are associated with self-regulatory abilities. Understanding diverse self-regulation patterns among people who have used cannabis can help identify and mitigate risky behaviors, including DUI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估风险、监控大麻使用情况并计划安全回家:探索与吸食大麻和驾车相关的自我调节过程。
目标:预防吸食大麻后驾车涉及了解使用者如何评估风险、监控其使用情况以及如何计划安全回家。虽然现有研究显示不同使用者群体使用大麻的模式存在很大差异,但对使用者自我调节的研究却少得多。目前的研究旨在根据使用或曾经使用过大麻的人对风险的认知、对自身损伤的监控以及避免在大麻影响下驾车(DUIC)的计划,确定他们的亚群体,从而研究不同的特征与 DUIC 结果之间的关系:参与者是加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的一个子样本,他们参加了 2022 年国际大麻政策研究,并报告曾经或正在使用大麻(样本数 = 886,年龄平均值 = 43.58,年龄差异值 = 13.67;女性占 63%)。通过在线自我报告调查,对风险认知、损伤监测、规划能力、DUIC 相关行为、大麻使用及相关问题进行了评估:潜在特征分析根据参与者的风险认知水平、监测水平和避免酒驾的计划,确定了三组自我调节者。大多数参与者(51%)表现出中度自我调节,风险认知、监控和计划水平一般。高度自律 "组(20%)的风险意识、监控和计划水平最高。低自律 "组(29%)的风险意识最低,对监控的信心不足,酒后驾车计划性也较低。他们的情况与酒驾和醉驾的结果之间存在明显差异。与低度或中度自我调节者相比,高度自我调节的大麻使用者(包括过去和现在的使用者)较少成为酒后驾车者的乘客,也更有可能采取干预措施阻止朋友酒后驾车。然而,在是否曾在大麻影响下驾车的报告中,他们的情况没有差异:结论:风险认知、监控和计划方面的差异与自我调节能力有关。了解吸食大麻者的不同自我调节模式有助于识别和减少危险行为,包括酒后驾车。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Prediction of traffic accident risk based on vehicle trajectory data. Rear passenger restraint in frontal NCAP tests compared to the right-front passenger. The comparison of STOP-BANG and no-apnea questionnaires in screening obstructive sleep apnea among commercial drivers. A novel approach for safety assessment at unsignalized intersections: Integrating spatial metrics into postencroachment time analysis under heterogeneous traffic conditions. Alcohol perceptions and driving decisions among adolescents: Exploring the role of peer and parental influences in Virginia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1