Culturally Sensitive Design Tool Kit Developed Through Global Co-Design.

Tori Simpson, Abigail Hoover
{"title":"Culturally Sensitive Design Tool Kit Developed Through Global Co-Design.","authors":"Tori Simpson, Abigail Hoover","doi":"10.3233/SHTI240990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Designers are increasingly navigating translocated contexts, presenting the need to develop strong skills in sensitively working with host communities, avoiding surface-level engagements, and considering the longevity, ownership, and impact of designs [1]. This paper reviews a series of co-design workshops organised by Imperial College London and Royal College of Art's MASc Global Innovation Design (GID) students, Abigail Hoover, and Tori Simpson. These workshops assembled a global community of design experts, students, and academics to share their experiences and approaches when designing for diverse communities to create culturally robust design interventions that are contextually innovative in the cultures and communities they exist in. The outcome of these workshops is a collection of co-designed guidelines to support design practitioners in ethical co-design practices, particularly when engaging with communities to which they do not belong. The goal of conducting these workshops was to discuss, and create strategies to avoid design tourism, a concept that straddles many names, including parachute design, design littering, and design imperialism. Meaning 'projects where the primary purpose of the project is the educational or personal development of the visitors, and the resulting ideas are left without any potential for realistic implementation.' [2] This paper outlines the tools, techniques, and knowledge generated through collaborative participation and reflection during the workshops that can be applied within culturally sensitive projects and ever-evolving design environments. It will review the created workshop structure and outcome analysis strategies cataloguing results against pre-existing design ethics structures. These outputs prompt the designer to reflect on their own practice, how they involve users, and what is left behind for communities involved. This paper serves as a valuable resource for designers seeking to navigate design with cultural sensitivity and adaptability, incorporate best practice, as well as new approaches to innovation, and facilitate actionable response to generate sustainable futures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"320 ","pages":"106-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI240990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Designers are increasingly navigating translocated contexts, presenting the need to develop strong skills in sensitively working with host communities, avoiding surface-level engagements, and considering the longevity, ownership, and impact of designs [1]. This paper reviews a series of co-design workshops organised by Imperial College London and Royal College of Art's MASc Global Innovation Design (GID) students, Abigail Hoover, and Tori Simpson. These workshops assembled a global community of design experts, students, and academics to share their experiences and approaches when designing for diverse communities to create culturally robust design interventions that are contextually innovative in the cultures and communities they exist in. The outcome of these workshops is a collection of co-designed guidelines to support design practitioners in ethical co-design practices, particularly when engaging with communities to which they do not belong. The goal of conducting these workshops was to discuss, and create strategies to avoid design tourism, a concept that straddles many names, including parachute design, design littering, and design imperialism. Meaning 'projects where the primary purpose of the project is the educational or personal development of the visitors, and the resulting ideas are left without any potential for realistic implementation.' [2] This paper outlines the tools, techniques, and knowledge generated through collaborative participation and reflection during the workshops that can be applied within culturally sensitive projects and ever-evolving design environments. It will review the created workshop structure and outcome analysis strategies cataloguing results against pre-existing design ethics structures. These outputs prompt the designer to reflect on their own practice, how they involve users, and what is left behind for communities involved. This paper serves as a valuable resource for designers seeking to navigate design with cultural sensitivity and adaptability, incorporate best practice, as well as new approaches to innovation, and facilitate actionable response to generate sustainable futures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过全球共同设计开发的文化敏感型设计工具包。
设计师们越来越多地在移居国外的环境中游刃有余,这就要求他们在与东道主社区的合作中培养敏锐的技能,避免表面上的接触,并考虑设计的持久性、所有权和影响力[1]。本文回顾了由伦敦帝国理工学院和皇家艺术学院全球创新设计(GID)硕士生阿比盖尔-胡佛(Abigail Hoover)和托里-辛普森(Tori Simpson)组织的一系列共同设计研讨会。这些研讨会汇集了全球的设计专家、学生和学者,分享了他们在为不同社区进行设计时的经验和方法,以创造出在文化和社区背景下具有创新性的、文化上稳健的设计干预措施。这些研讨会的成果是一套共同设计的指南,用于支持设计从业人员开展符合道德规范的共同设计实践,特别是在与他们不属于的社区接触时。开展这些工作坊的目的是讨论并制定避免设计旅游的策略。"设计旅游 "这个概念有很多名称,包括降落伞设计、设计垃圾和设计帝国主义。意思是 "以游客的教育或个人发展为主要目的的项目,由此产生的想法没有任何现实实施的可能性"。[2] 本文概述了工作坊中通过合作参与和反思产生的工具、技术和知识,这些工具、技术和知识可以应用于文化敏感型项目和不断发展的设计环境中。本文将回顾所创建的工作坊结构和成果分析策略,并根据已有的设计伦理结构对结果进行编目。这些成果促使设计师反思自己的实践、如何让用户参与进来,以及为相关社区留下了什么。本文为设计师提供了宝贵的资源,帮助他们以文化敏感性和适应性来驾驭设计,融入最佳实践和新的创新方法,并促进可操作的应对措施,以创造可持续的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Service Thinking in Architectural Design for Dementia in the Finnish Context. Shaping the Typology of Modern Finnish Psychiatric Hospitals: Analyzing Design Briefs of Two Case Studies. Soundscape Augmentation in Dementia Care Design; Need for a Guideline. Stand(ing)still?! Exploring Motion Affordances in Learning Environments as a Lever for Better Motor Skills in Youngsters. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Journey of an Architect-Researcher in Palliative Environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1