{"title":"SiamTADT: A Task-Aware Drone Tracker for Aerial Autonomous Vehicles","authors":"Luming Li;Chenglizhao Chen;Xu Yu;Shanchen Pang;Hong Qin","doi":"10.1109/TVT.2024.3499947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"State-of-the-art (SOTA) drone trackers struggle with small target bounding box regression and target classification amidst background interference in drone tracking scenarios. These challenges arise from a “task-unaware” conventional tracking methodology that treats bounding box regression and classification as indistinct tasks, neglecting their differing feature requirements. This paper introduces a “<italic><b>task-aware</b></i>” tracking methodology, addressing these issues by discriminating between the two subtasks and assigning them their optimal feature representations. The methodology includes a “<italic><b>task-aware</b></i>” encoder, a “<italic><b>task-aware</b></i>” decoder, and a mutual-self training strategy. The encoder provides tailored feature representations for each subtask, while the decoder employs distinct structures to leverage these task-specific features. The mutual-self training strategy further enhances performance by fostering synergy between the subtasks. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed approach. It outperforms the SOTA drone tracker by 2.3% and 3.8% across six drone tracking datasets and surpasses its baseline by 12% and 9% on average. Additionally, tests on conventional tracking datasets show the method's robustness, matching SOTA conventional trackers while improving the baseline by 28% and 13.5% across two metrics. This innovative method bridges the gap between task-specific needs and feature usage, advancing drone tracking performance. Codes and results will be publicly available.","PeriodicalId":13421,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology","volume":"74 3","pages":"3708-3722"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10755105/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
State-of-the-art (SOTA) drone trackers struggle with small target bounding box regression and target classification amidst background interference in drone tracking scenarios. These challenges arise from a “task-unaware” conventional tracking methodology that treats bounding box regression and classification as indistinct tasks, neglecting their differing feature requirements. This paper introduces a “task-aware” tracking methodology, addressing these issues by discriminating between the two subtasks and assigning them their optimal feature representations. The methodology includes a “task-aware” encoder, a “task-aware” decoder, and a mutual-self training strategy. The encoder provides tailored feature representations for each subtask, while the decoder employs distinct structures to leverage these task-specific features. The mutual-self training strategy further enhances performance by fostering synergy between the subtasks. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed approach. It outperforms the SOTA drone tracker by 2.3% and 3.8% across six drone tracking datasets and surpasses its baseline by 12% and 9% on average. Additionally, tests on conventional tracking datasets show the method's robustness, matching SOTA conventional trackers while improving the baseline by 28% and 13.5% across two metrics. This innovative method bridges the gap between task-specific needs and feature usage, advancing drone tracking performance. Codes and results will be publicly available.
期刊介绍:
The scope of the Transactions is threefold (which was approved by the IEEE Periodicals Committee in 1967) and is published on the journal website as follows: Communications: The use of mobile radio on land, sea, and air, including cellular radio, two-way radio, and one-way radio, with applications to dispatch and control vehicles, mobile radiotelephone, radio paging, and status monitoring and reporting. Related areas include spectrum usage, component radio equipment such as cavities and antennas, compute control for radio systems, digital modulation and transmission techniques, mobile radio circuit design, radio propagation for vehicular communications, effects of ignition noise and radio frequency interference, and consideration of the vehicle as part of the radio operating environment. Transportation Systems: The use of electronic technology for the control of ground transportation systems including, but not limited to, traffic aid systems; traffic control systems; automatic vehicle identification, location, and monitoring systems; automated transport systems, with single and multiple vehicle control; and moving walkways or people-movers. Vehicular Electronics: The use of electronic or electrical components and systems for control, propulsion, or auxiliary functions, including but not limited to, electronic controls for engineer, drive train, convenience, safety, and other vehicle systems; sensors, actuators, and microprocessors for onboard use; electronic fuel control systems; vehicle electrical components and systems collision avoidance systems; electromagnetic compatibility in the vehicle environment; and electric vehicles and controls.