Uncovering the impact of digital technologies on strategising: Evidence from a systematic literature review

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Management Reviews Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1111/ijmr.12387
Qijun Zhou, Honglan Yu, Kweku Adams, Rexford Attah‐Boakye, Jeaneth Johansson
{"title":"Uncovering the impact of digital technologies on strategising: Evidence from a systematic literature review","authors":"Qijun Zhou, Honglan Yu, Kweku Adams, Rexford Attah‐Boakye, Jeaneth Johansson","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.12387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adopting digital technologies in different organizations has become a trend over the last decade, yet our understanding regarding impact of digital technologies on strategising needs to be more cohersive. This paper reviews existing research on how digital transformation intersects with strategic management to adress this gap. Specifically, the aim is to explore how the digital context changes strategising. Based on a systematic review of empirical evidence from 163 journal papers, we showcased the manifestation of strategising in the digital age in terms of strategic practitioners, practices and praxis. By consolidating these findings, a typology of strategic actions in the digital age is developed and discussed, highlighting the interplay among changes in strategy‐as‐practice parameters. This framework clarifies in strategic scenarios of digital transformation and identifies various strategic directions and actions. Overall, we argue that although digital transformation has created additional strategic options, it has yet to change the underlying assumptions of strategising in firms.","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12387","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adopting digital technologies in different organizations has become a trend over the last decade, yet our understanding regarding impact of digital technologies on strategising needs to be more cohersive. This paper reviews existing research on how digital transformation intersects with strategic management to adress this gap. Specifically, the aim is to explore how the digital context changes strategising. Based on a systematic review of empirical evidence from 163 journal papers, we showcased the manifestation of strategising in the digital age in terms of strategic practitioners, practices and praxis. By consolidating these findings, a typology of strategic actions in the digital age is developed and discussed, highlighting the interplay among changes in strategy‐as‐practice parameters. This framework clarifies in strategic scenarios of digital transformation and identifies various strategic directions and actions. Overall, we argue that although digital transformation has created additional strategic options, it has yet to change the underlying assumptions of strategising in firms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示数字技术对战略制定的影响:系统文献综述的证据
在过去十年中,不同组织采用数字技术已成为一种趋势,但我们对数字技术对战略制定的影响的理解还需要更加一致。本文回顾了现有关于数字化转型如何与战略管理相互影响的研究,以弥补这一不足。具体来说,本文旨在探讨数字化背景如何改变战略制定。在对 163 篇期刊论文的实证证据进行系统回顾的基础上,我们从战略实践者、实践和实践的角度展示了数字化时代战略制定的表现形式。通过整合这些研究成果,我们提出并讨论了数字时代战略行动的类型,强调了战略即实践参数变化之间的相互作用。这一框架明确了数字化转型的战略情景,并确定了各种战略方向和行动。总之,我们认为,尽管数字化转型创造了更多的战略选择,但尚未改变企业制定战略的基本假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) stands as the premier global review journal in Organisation and Management Studies (OMS). Its published papers aim to provide substantial conceptual contributions, acting as a strategic platform for new research directions. IJMR plays a pivotal role in influencing how OMS scholars conceptualize research in their respective fields. The journal's reviews critically assess the state of knowledge in specific fields, appraising the conceptual foundations of competing paradigms to advance current and future research in the area.
期刊最新文献
Interactional governing activities: A novel perspective on how actors co‐develop field governance Issue information Reflecting back and looking forward: A systematic literature review of SME–university collaborations Deceptive signalling: Causes, consequences and remedies Conceptualising SME brand co‐creation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1