International Journal of Management Reviews最新文献

Muslim mothers’ intersecting tensions in combining breastfeeding and employment: A systematic review and research agenda 穆斯林母亲在结合母乳喂养和就业方面的交叉紧张：系统审查和研究议程

IF 8.1 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

International Journal of Management Reviews

Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.70014

Feranaaz Farista, Ameeta Jaga

The intersection of gender, time and marginalization in organizations is evident in the challenges faced by employed mothers, particularly those who are breastfeeding. These challenges are amplified for Muslim mothers, who must navigate intersecting social identities within these structures shaped by dominant masculine norms. In Islam, breastfeeding is embedded in religious beliefs, moral values and spirituality, shaping how employed mothers experience and manage their dual commitments to work and family. This systematic review explores how Muslim mothers negotiate breastfeeding, motherhood and employment, responding to calls for context‐sensitive and intersectional studies that support diverse women's economic participation. Drawing on a transnational psychology lens, we synthesize findings around key challenges and empowerment strategies. We illustrate how cultural expectations of breastfeeding, maternal deference to elders and normative motherhood ideals intersect with religious influences—such as Quranic principles of modesty, gender segregation and traditional dress practices like hijab—to shape mothers’ access to employment, career progression and professional networking in male‐dominated spaces. These intersecting norms create temporal constraints that influence mothers’ daily routines. Given the paucity of research and theoretical underdevelopment in this area, we conclude with a research agenda to advance conceptual, theoretical and methodological developments of breastfeeding and employment in diverse contexts.

职场母亲，尤其是母乳喂养的母亲所面临的挑战明显体现了性别、时间和组织中边缘化的交集。对于穆斯林母亲来说，这些挑战被放大了，她们必须在这些由占主导地位的男性规范塑造的结构中驾驭交叉的社会身份。在伊斯兰教，母乳喂养根植于宗教信仰、道德价值观和灵性之中，影响着职业母亲如何体验和管理她们对工作和家庭的双重承诺。这篇系统综述探讨了穆斯林母亲如何在母乳喂养、母性和就业问题上进行协商，响应对支持多样化妇女经济参与的背景敏感和交叉研究的呼吁。利用跨国心理学的视角，我们综合了围绕关键挑战和赋权策略的研究结果。我们阐述了对母乳喂养、母亲对长辈的尊重和规范的母性理想的文化期望如何与宗教影响（如古兰经的谦逊原则、性别隔离和传统的着装习惯，如头巾）相结合，从而影响母亲在男性主导的空间中获得就业、职业发展和职业关系网的途径。这些相互交叉的规范造成了时间上的限制，影响了母亲的日常生活。鉴于这一领域的研究缺乏和理论不发达，我们最后提出了一项研究议程，以促进不同背景下母乳喂养和就业的概念、理论和方法发展。

{"title":"Muslim mothers’ intersecting tensions in combining breastfeeding and employment: A systematic review and research agenda","authors":"Feranaaz Farista, Ameeta Jaga","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.70014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.70014","url":null,"abstract":"The intersection of gender, time and marginalization in organizations is evident in the challenges faced by employed mothers, particularly those who are breastfeeding. These challenges are amplified for Muslim mothers, who must navigate intersecting social identities within these structures shaped by dominant masculine norms. In Islam, breastfeeding is embedded in religious beliefs, moral values and spirituality, shaping how employed mothers experience and manage their dual commitments to work and family. This systematic review explores how Muslim mothers negotiate breastfeeding, motherhood and employment, responding to calls for context‐sensitive and intersectional studies that support diverse women's economic participation. Drawing on a transnational psychology lens, we synthesize findings around key challenges and empowerment strategies. We illustrate how cultural expectations of breastfeeding, maternal deference to elders and normative motherhood ideals intersect with religious influences—such as Quranic principles of modesty, gender segregation and traditional dress practices like hijab—to shape mothers’ access to employment, career progression and professional networking in male‐dominated spaces. These intersecting norms create temporal constraints that influence mothers’ daily routines. Given the paucity of research and theoretical underdevelopment in this area, we conclude with a research agenda to advance conceptual, theoretical and methodological developments of breastfeeding and employment in diverse contexts.","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146101359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Multinational enterprises’ contribution to gender equality: An integrative framework 跨国企业对性别平等的贡献：一个综合框架

IF 8.1 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

International Journal of Management Reviews

Pub Date : 2026-01-09 DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.70015

Sonia María Suárez‐Ortega, Mar Suarez, Cristina López‐Duarte

Despite the progress made in recent years, inequalities between men and women persist. Gender equality (GE) is one of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG5) that multinational enterprises (MNEs) can contribute most to. This is because SDG5 integrates directly into MNEs’ human resource practices, supply chain management and corporate social responsibility initiatives, making it more actionable for MNEs. Despite their potential contribution, knowledge about how MNEs can impact SDG5 remains fragmented, inconsistent and scattered across disciplines such as management, economics and gender studies. Therefore, a comprehensive analysis of the literature is urgently needed. We address this gap through a systematic literature review relying on a taxonomy of the mechanisms through which MNEs can impact SDG5: human resource management strategy, partnership, philanthropy, advocacy, and indirect mechanisms. Drawing on the findings from 158 empirical articles, we developed an integrative framework to help understand the potential contribution MNEs can make towards GE. The framework underscores the need to simultaneously consider contextual factors at multiple levels (individual, organizational, meso and macro) to discover why intended GE policies may fail to achieve their desired outcomes. Furthermore, in order to truly contribute to SDG5, MNEs must not only engage with the various mechanisms they can activate to promote GE but should also remain aware of the indirect mechanisms triggered by their investments and business activities, which may produce either positive or negative effects for women in the countries where they operate.

尽管近年来取得了进展，但男女之间的不平等仍然存在。性别平等（GE）是联合国可持续发展目标（SDG5）之一，跨国企业（MNEs）可以做出最大的贡献。这是因为可持续发展目标5直接融入了跨国公司的人力资源实践、供应链管理和企业社会责任倡议，使其更具可操作性。尽管跨国公司有潜在的贡献，但关于它们如何影响可持续发展目标5的知识仍然是碎片化的、不一致的，并且分散在管理、经济学和性别研究等学科中。因此，迫切需要对文献进行全面分析。我们根据跨国公司影响可持续发展目标5的机制分类（人力资源管理战略、伙伴关系、慈善事业、倡导和间接机制），通过系统的文献综述来解决这一差距。根据158篇实证文章的发现，我们开发了一个综合框架，以帮助理解跨国公司对通用电气的潜在贡献。该框架强调需要同时考虑多个层面（个人、组织、中微观和宏观）的背景因素，以发现为什么预期的通用电气政策可能无法实现预期的结果。此外，为了真正为可持续发展目标5做出贡献，跨国公司不仅必须参与其可以激活的各种机制，以促进通用电气，还应意识到其投资和商业活动引发的间接机制，这些机制可能会对其经营所在国的妇女产生积极或消极的影响。

{"title":"Multinational enterprises’ contribution to gender equality: An integrative framework","authors":"Sonia María Suárez‐Ortega, Mar Suarez, Cristina López‐Duarte","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.70015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.70015","url":null,"abstract":"Despite the progress made in recent years, inequalities between men and women persist. Gender equality (GE) is one of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG5) that multinational enterprises (MNEs) can contribute most to. This is because SDG5 integrates directly into MNEs’ human resource practices, supply chain management and corporate social responsibility initiatives, making it more actionable for MNEs. Despite their potential contribution, knowledge about how MNEs can impact SDG5 remains fragmented, inconsistent and scattered across disciplines such as management, economics and gender studies. Therefore, a comprehensive analysis of the literature is urgently needed. We address this gap through a systematic literature review relying on a taxonomy of the mechanisms through which MNEs can impact SDG5: human resource management strategy, partnership, philanthropy, advocacy, and indirect mechanisms. Drawing on the findings from 158 empirical articles, we developed an integrative framework to help understand the potential contribution MNEs can make towards GE. The framework underscores the need to simultaneously consider contextual factors at multiple levels (individual, organizational, meso and macro) to discover why intended GE policies may fail to achieve their desired outcomes. Furthermore, in order to truly contribute to SDG5, MNEs must not only engage with the various mechanisms they can activate to promote GE but should also remain aware of the indirect mechanisms triggered by their investments and business activities, which may produce either positive or negative effects for women in the countries where they operate.","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145920187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Advancing a relational perspective on leadership between neurotypical leaders and neurodivergent followers: An integrated systematic review and research agenda 推进神经典型型领导者与神经发散型追随者之间领导力的关系视角：一个综合的系统回顾和研究议程

IF 8.1 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

International Journal of Management Reviews

Pub Date : 2025-12-11 DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.70008

Mya Kirkwood, Laura Radcliffe, Joanne Lyubovnikova, Lilian Otaye‐Ebede

Leaders are widely positioned as cornerstones of neurodiversity inclusion within research and practice. Despite this, the management discipline remains plighted by lack of cohesive understanding regarding leadership in the context of neurodiversity—an issue only exacerbated by the fragmented nature of extant interdisciplinary research. Given the pressing need for empirical synthesis and clearer conceptualization, we present the first interdisciplinary integrative systematic review examining the experience and enactment of leadership within neurotypical leader–neurodivergent follower dyads. By reviewing 43 articles, across 13 disciplines, we identify 3 key themes: reciprocal communication, consequences of communication and multi‐level contextual influences on reciprocal leader–follower communication practices. Next, to integrate these themes into a cohesive conceptual framework, we draw on two existing theoretical perspectives—the double‐empathy problem and relational leadership theory. Together, these lenses enable us to present novel relational insights into how the enactment of leadership is experienced and constructed within these dyads, identifying two leadership pathways that explain how the double‐empathy problem may be either alleviated or exacerbated. Finally, we present an evidence‐informed future research agenda covering theoretical and methodological recommendations that will be instrumental in advancing this emerging research field and enhancing inclusive practices of leaders in organizations.

领导者被广泛定位为研究和实践中神经多样性包容的基石。尽管如此，管理学科仍然因缺乏对神经多样性背景下领导力的凝聚力理解而陷入困境——现有跨学科研究的碎片化性质只会加剧这一问题。鉴于对经验综合和更清晰的概念化的迫切需要，我们提出了第一个跨学科的综合系统综述，研究了神经型领导者-神经发散型追随者二元组的领导经验和制定。通过回顾13个学科的43篇文章，我们确定了3个关键主题：互惠沟通、沟通的后果以及对互惠领导者-追随者沟通实践的多层次情境影响。接下来，为了将这些主题整合到一个有凝聚力的概念框架中，我们借鉴了两种现有的理论观点——双重共情问题和关系领导理论。总之，这些镜头使我们能够提出新颖的关系见解，以了解领导的制定是如何在这些二元组合中经历和构建的，确定了两种领导途径，解释了双重共情问题是如何缓解或加剧的。最后，我们提出了一个基于证据的未来研究议程，涵盖理论和方法建议，这些建议将有助于推动这一新兴研究领域的发展，并加强组织中领导者的包容性实践。

{"title":"Advancing a relational perspective on leadership between neurotypical leaders and neurodivergent followers: An integrated systematic review and research agenda","authors":"Mya Kirkwood, Laura Radcliffe, Joanne Lyubovnikova, Lilian Otaye‐Ebede","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.70008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.70008","url":null,"abstract":"Leaders are widely positioned as cornerstones of neurodiversity inclusion within research and practice. Despite this, the management discipline remains plighted by lack of cohesive understanding regarding leadership in the context of neurodiversity—an issue only exacerbated by the fragmented nature of extant interdisciplinary research. Given the pressing need for empirical synthesis and clearer conceptualization, we present the first interdisciplinary integrative systematic review examining the experience and enactment of leadership within neurotypical leader–neurodivergent follower dyads. By reviewing 43 articles, across 13 disciplines, we identify 3 key themes: reciprocal communication, consequences of communication and multi‐level contextual influences on reciprocal leader–follower communication practices. Next, to integrate these themes into a cohesive conceptual framework, we draw on two existing theoretical perspectives—the double‐empathy problem and relational leadership theory. Together, these lenses enable us to present novel relational insights into how the enactment of leadership is experienced and constructed within these dyads, identifying two leadership pathways that explain how the double‐empathy problem may be either alleviated or exacerbated. Finally, we present an evidence‐informed future research agenda covering theoretical and methodological recommendations that will be instrumental in advancing this emerging research field and enhancing inclusive practices of leaders in organizations.","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145730988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Theorizing the Linkage between Place Branding and Sustainable Destinations: An Integrative and Generative Review 理论化地方品牌与可持续目的地之间的联系：一个综合和生成的回顾

IF 8.1 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

International Journal of Management Reviews

Pub Date : 2025-11-24 DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.70009

Cecilia Pasquinelli, Mihalis Kavaratzis

The urgent transition towards more sustainable futures requires places and tourism destinations to leverage every available tool to assist in this effort. Previous research brought attention to the subjective and perceptual dimension of sustainable tourism, suggesting the importance of stakeholders’ perceptions in destination development. Place branding can interact with such perceptions, yet its role in advancing the sustainable destination remains unexplored. This article addresses this gap by integrating research from sustainable destinations and place branding and theorising the mechanisms that connect them. An integrative and generative literature review guides this explorative and combining effort. Six thematic clusters framing the sustainable destination and seven thematic clusters framing place branding reveal their frail connections and evidence of the need for integration. By integrating, synthesizing and comparing these results and coupling them with the concept of situational meaning, this study develops a theoretical framework that explains how place branding can be harnessed to foster a more sustainable future for tourism destinations and their communities. Six research streams are proposed that substantiate the potential of place branding in enhancing sustainability meaning‐making and, in turn, support the development of sustainable destinations, highlighting future research avenues for sustainability‐driven place branding.

向更可持续未来的紧迫过渡要求各地和旅游目的地利用一切可用工具来协助这一努力。以往的研究关注可持续旅游的主观和感知维度，表明利益相关者的感知在目的地发展中的重要性。场所品牌可以与这些观念互动，但它在促进可持续目的地方面的作用仍未得到探索。本文通过整合可持续目的地和地方品牌的研究，并将连接它们的机制理论化，解决了这一差距。综合和生成的文献综述指导这一探索和结合的努力。构建可持续目的地的六个主题集群和构建地方品牌的七个主题集群揭示了它们之间脆弱的联系和整合需求的证据。通过整合、综合和比较这些结果，并将它们与情境意义的概念结合起来，本研究开发了一个理论框架，解释了如何利用地方品牌来促进旅游目的地及其社区更可持续的未来。本文提出了六个研究流程，以证实地方品牌在增强可持续性意义创造方面的潜力，并反过来支持可持续目的地的发展，突出了可持续发展驱动的地方品牌的未来研究途径。

{"title":"Theorizing the Linkage between Place Branding and Sustainable Destinations: An Integrative and Generative Review","authors":"Cecilia Pasquinelli, Mihalis Kavaratzis","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.70009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.70009","url":null,"abstract":"The urgent transition towards more sustainable futures requires places and tourism destinations to leverage every available tool to assist in this effort. Previous research brought attention to the subjective and perceptual dimension of sustainable tourism, suggesting the importance of stakeholders’ perceptions in destination development. Place branding can interact with such perceptions, yet its role in advancing the sustainable destination remains unexplored. This article addresses this gap by integrating research from sustainable destinations and place branding and theorising the mechanisms that connect them. An integrative and generative literature review guides this explorative and combining effort. Six thematic clusters framing the sustainable destination and seven thematic clusters framing place branding reveal their frail connections and evidence of the need for integration. By integrating, synthesizing and comparing these results and coupling them with the concept of situational meaning, this study develops a theoretical framework that explains how place branding can be harnessed to foster a more sustainable future for tourism destinations and their communities. Six research streams are proposed that substantiate the potential of place branding in enhancing sustainability meaning‐making and, in turn, support the development of sustainable destinations, highlighting future research avenues for sustainability‐driven place branding.","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145583007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The power of a stewardship mind: Reorienting organizations around the duty to care to better address grand challenges 管理思想的力量：围绕关心的责任重新定位组织，以更好地应对重大挑战

IF 8.1 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

International Journal of Management Reviews

Pub Date : 2025-10-13 DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.70006

Debora Casoli, Marco Visentin, Annamaria Tuan, Giuseppe Cappiello

The present article presents an integrative review related to stewardship in all the business and management disciplines, from its initial development in 1980 to the present. Specifically, we applied a latent Dirichlet allocation‐based topic modelling analysis to almost 1200 articles, seeking to creatively synthesize the concept of stewardship around the two recurring building blocks of the psychological contract defined in the literature: the duty to care and the related psychological currencies. From this foundation, we propose the novel concept of the stewardship mind: a way of thinking characterized by the intention to be credible and consistent in fulfilling a duty to care of something of value, motivated by a certain degree of ideological currency. We articulate this concept further by providing a taxonomy of stewardship minds, ranging from mainly instrumental to mainly ideological. This taxonomy may help inspire managers to integrate stewardship into their daily actions and communications. In fact, we advance that a genuine stewardship mind has the most potential to tackle grand societal and environmental challenges. We also discuss an array of avenues for future research.

本文介绍了从1980年开始发展到现在，所有商业和管理学科中与管理相关的综合综述。具体而言，我们对近1200篇文章应用了基于潜在狄利克雷分配的主题建模分析，试图创造性地综合管理概念，围绕文献中定义的心理契约的两个反复出现的组成部分：关心的责任和相关的心理货币。在此基础上，我们提出了管理思维的新概念：一种思维方式，其特点是在履行照顾有价值的东西的责任时，受到一定程度的意识形态货币的激励，其意图是可信的和一致的。我们通过提供管理思想的分类进一步阐明这一概念，范围从主要是工具性的到主要是意识形态的。这种分类可能有助于激励管理者将管理工作整合到他们的日常行动和沟通中。事实上，我们提出，真正的管理思想最有可能解决重大的社会和环境挑战。我们还讨论了未来研究的一系列途径。

{"title":"The power of a stewardship mind: Reorienting organizations around the duty to care to better address grand challenges","authors":"Debora Casoli, Marco Visentin, Annamaria Tuan, Giuseppe Cappiello","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.70006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.70006","url":null,"abstract":"The present article presents an integrative review related to stewardship in all the business and management disciplines, from its initial development in 1980 to the present. Specifically, we applied a latent Dirichlet allocation‐based topic modelling analysis to almost 1200 articles, seeking to creatively synthesize the concept of stewardship around the two recurring building blocks of the psychological contract defined in the literature: the duty to care and the related psychological currencies. From this foundation, we propose the novel concept of the stewardship mind: a way of thinking characterized by the intention to be credible and consistent in fulfilling a duty to care of something of value, motivated by a certain degree of ideological currency. We articulate this concept further by providing a taxonomy of stewardship minds, ranging from mainly instrumental to mainly ideological. This taxonomy may help inspire managers to integrate stewardship into their daily actions and communications. In fact, we advance that a genuine stewardship mind has the most potential to tackle grand societal and environmental challenges. We also discuss an array of avenues for future research.","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145283513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Demystifying the impact of moderators in the corporate sustainability performance and firm performance relationship: A meta‐analysis study 揭示调节因子对企业可持续发展绩效和企业绩效关系的影响：一项meta分析研究

IF 8.1 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

International Journal of Management Reviews

Pub Date : 2025-10-08 DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.70007

Garima Kumari, Yatish Joshi, Tanuj Nandan

Over the years, a contentious debate has emerged regarding the relationship between corporate sustainability performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP). To disentangle the confounding results, the present study delves into the concepts of stakeholder and resource‐based view theory, presenting quantitative findings from the existing literature through a meta‐analysis to establish the CSP–CFP relationship. The analysis incorporates 82 studies with 152 effect sizes, revealing a positive and significant nexus between CSP and CFP, with no evidence of publication bias. Additionally, the study explores the direction of causality in this association, demonstrating that prior CSP is associated with improved subsequent CFP, though the reverse is not validated. The study also examines contextual and method moderators responsible for between‐study variance. Notably, the study makes a distinctive and unparalleled contribution by advancing methodological rigor, integrating subgroup analysis with meta‐regression to examine the CSP–CFP nexus. The results provide theoretical contributions, offering valuable insights and suggestions for future research on the CSP–CFP association, thereby paving the way for further scholarly work.

多年来，关于企业可持续发展绩效（CSP）和企业财务绩效（CFP）之间的关系，出现了一个有争议的争论。为了理清这些混淆的结果，本研究深入研究了利益相关者和资源基础观点理论的概念，通过荟萃分析，从现有文献中得出定量结果，以建立CSP-CFP关系。该分析纳入了82项研究，152个效应量，揭示了CSP和CFP之间的积极和显著联系，没有证据表明存在发表偏倚。此外，该研究探讨了这种关联的因果关系方向，表明先前的CSP与随后的CFP改善相关，尽管相反的情况尚未得到证实。该研究还检查了对研究间差异负责的上下文和方法调节因子。值得注意的是，该研究通过推进方法的严谨性，将亚组分析与元回归结合起来检查CSP-CFP关系，做出了独特而无与伦比的贡献。研究结果为CSP-CFP协会的未来研究提供了有价值的见解和建议，从而为进一步的学术工作铺平了道路。

{"title":"Demystifying the impact of moderators in the corporate sustainability performance and firm performance relationship: A meta‐analysis study","authors":"Garima Kumari, Yatish Joshi, Tanuj Nandan","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.70007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.70007","url":null,"abstract":"Over the years, a contentious debate has emerged regarding the relationship between corporate sustainability performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP). To disentangle the confounding results, the present study delves into the concepts of stakeholder and resource‐based view theory, presenting quantitative findings from the existing literature through a meta‐analysis to establish the CSP–CFP relationship. The analysis incorporates 82 studies with 152 effect sizes, revealing a positive and significant nexus between CSP and CFP, with no evidence of publication bias. Additionally, the study explores the direction of causality in this association, demonstrating that prior CSP is associated with improved subsequent CFP, though the reverse is not validated. The study also examines contextual and method moderators responsible for between‐study variance. Notably, the study makes a distinctive and unparalleled contribution by advancing methodological rigor, integrating subgroup analysis with meta‐regression to examine the CSP–CFP nexus. The results provide theoretical contributions, offering valuable insights and suggestions for future research on the CSP–CFP association, thereby paving the way for further scholarly work.","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145246718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Towards a 4P framework of financial statement fraud: A systematic literature review 财务报表舞弊的4P框架：系统的文献综述

IF 8.1 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

International Journal of Management Reviews

Pub Date : 2025-10-06 DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.70005

Umar Farooq, Adeel Nasir, Kanwal Iqbal Khan

This study presents a systematic literature review of financial statement fraud (FSF) through the lens of a 4P framework, including Proxy, Purpose, Penalty and Provision. Analysing 622 articles, the study examines fraud proxies, thematic analysis, post‐fraud outcomes and fraud contingencies. The results reveal a lack of consensus regarding standardised measures of FSF, whereas most studies rely on ex‐post fraud proxies, which inherit contextual limitations. Similarly, thematic analysis identifies nine key themes within the FSF literature, with a significant focus on fraud detection and its determinants. The literature has also explored various post‐fraud outcomes, which can be categorised into firm losses and responses by internal and external stakeholders. Furthermore, macroeconomic, behavioural, firm‐specific and governance‐related variables are used as moderators in FSF literature. Considering these insights, this research identifies six key research areas and proposes 30 research questions that future studies should address to contribute to this prominent area of research.

本研究通过4P框架，包括代理、目的、惩罚和准备，对财务报表欺诈（FSF）进行了系统的文献综述。该研究分析了622篇文章，考察了欺诈代理、专题分析、欺诈后结果和欺诈或有事件。研究结果表明，对于金融稳定基金的标准化衡量标准缺乏共识，而大多数研究依赖于事后欺诈代理，这继承了背景限制。同样，专题分析确定了FSF文献中的九个关键主题，重点关注欺诈检测及其决定因素。文献还探讨了各种欺诈后的结果，这些结果可以分为公司损失和内部和外部利益相关者的反应。此外，宏观经济、行为、公司特定和治理相关的变量被用作FSF文献中的调节因子。考虑到这些见解，本研究确定了六个关键的研究领域，并提出了未来研究应该解决的30个研究问题，以促进这一突出的研究领域。

引用次数: 0

Rethinking network embeddedness in international business: A review and view in space and time 国际商务中网络嵌入性的再思考：时空回顾与视角

IF 8.1 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

International Journal of Management Reviews

Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.70004

Giulia Galizzi, Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki, Ulf Andersson

Conceptual and empirical contributions to network embeddedness have flourished in the last decades within the field of international business (IB). Scholars have used the concept to explain IB phenomena through the lens of business actors’ network relationships and positions in their networks. Yet, network embeddedness has been conceptualized and operationalized quite differently across IB. To bring clarity to the field, we conducted a systematic literature review of 182 conceptual and empirical articles published between 1996 and 2025. Our review unpacks the various theoretical perspectives, definitions and operationalizations used in network embeddedness research in IB. Moreover, our findings highlight the limited attention paid to space and time in the conceptualizations and operationalizations of network embeddedness in IB. To improve upon these aspects, we advance a spatio‐temporal view of network embeddedness that combines dimensions of geographical space beyond the country level, accounts for social and digital space and incorporates the notion of subjective time. Our proposed view opens new directions for future research in IB, moving and expanding current scholarship in the interface of network embeddedness and internationalization.

在过去的几十年里，在国际商务（IB）领域，对网络嵌入性的概念和实证贡献蓬勃发展。学者们利用这一概念，通过商业行为者的网络关系及其在网络中的地位来解释IB现象。然而，网络嵌入性在IB中的概念化和操作方式却截然不同。为了使该领域更加清晰，我们对1996年至2025年间发表的182篇概念性和实证性文章进行了系统的文献综述。本综述揭示了IB网络嵌入性研究中使用的各种理论视角、定义和操作方法。此外，我们的研究结果强调了在IB网络嵌入性的概念化和操作方法中对空间和时间的关注有限。为了改进这些方面，我们提出了一种结合国家层面以外的地理空间维度的网络嵌入性时空观。考虑到社交和数字空间，并结合了主观时间的概念。我们提出的观点为IB的未来研究开辟了新的方向，推动和扩展了网络嵌入和国际化接口的现有学术研究。

{"title":"Rethinking network embeddedness in international business: A review and view in space and time","authors":"Giulia Galizzi, Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki, Ulf Andersson","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.70004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.70004","url":null,"abstract":"Conceptual and empirical contributions to network embeddedness have flourished in the last decades within the field of international business (IB). Scholars have used the concept to explain IB phenomena through the lens of business actors’ network relationships and positions in their networks. Yet, network embeddedness has been conceptualized and operationalized quite differently across IB. To bring clarity to the field, we conducted a systematic literature review of 182 conceptual and empirical articles published between 1996 and 2025. Our review unpacks the various theoretical perspectives, definitions and operationalizations used in network embeddedness research in IB. Moreover, our findings highlight the limited attention paid to space and time in the conceptualizations and operationalizations of network embeddedness in IB. To improve upon these aspects, we advance a spatio‐temporal view of network embeddedness that combines dimensions of geographical space beyond the country level, accounts for social and digital space and incorporates the notion of subjective time. Our proposed view opens new directions for future research in IB, moving and expanding current scholarship in the interface of network embeddedness and internationalization.","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145254567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Correction to “Towards a heuristic view of managerial heuristics: Integrating divergent perspectives” 更正“迈向管理启发式的启发式观点：整合不同的观点”

IF 10.8 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

International Journal of Management Reviews

Pub Date : 2025-08-18 DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.70003

Atanasiu, R., Wickert, C. & Khapova, S.N. (2025) Towards a heuristic view of managerial heuristics: integrating divergent perspectives. International Journal of Management Reviews, 27, 58–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12382

In the Introduction, paragraph 4, first sentence, instead of:

“Many scholars have called for integrating the literature on managerial heuristics; we have mapped these calls on three complementary areas.”

The text should be read:

“Many scholars have called for integrating the literature on managerial heuristics (Hodgkinson et al., 2023); we have mapped these calls on three complementary areas.”

We apologize for this error.

Atanasiu， R., Wickert， C. & Khapova， S.N.（2025）管理启发的启发式观点：整合不同的观点。国际管理评论，27,58-80。可从：https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12382In引言，第4段，第一句话，而不是：“许多学者呼吁整合关于管理启发式的文献；我们将这些呼吁映射到三个互补的领域。”文本应该读为：“许多学者呼吁整合关于管理启发式的文献（Hodgkinson et al., 2023）；我们将这些呼吁映射到三个互补的领域。”我们为这个错误道歉。

引用次数: 0

An integrated framework of remote work from organizational adoption to employee outcomes: A systematic literature review 从组织采用到员工成果的远程工作集成框架：系统文献综述

IF 10.8 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

International Journal of Management Reviews

Pub Date : 2025-07-31 DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.70002

Tahrima Ferdous, Muhammad Ali, Kevin C. Desouza, Erica French

The adoption of remote work (RW) has surged dramatically since the COVID-19 pandemic, prompting organizations to explore new work models, including fully remote and hybrid arrangements. Despite a growing body of research on RW, we know little about the conceptual and empirical connections between contextual factors driving its organizational adoption in both business-as-usual (BAU) and disruptive environments. Similarly, the relationship between RW's use by employees and the mechanisms by which RW influences employee outcomes has not been well studied. By incorporating an examination of the adoption stage alongside use and outcomes, researchers can develop a more nuanced understanding of RW that informs theory and practice. To this end, we propose an integrated evidence-based RW framework grounded in the technology–organization–environment framework and job demands–resources model, based on a systematic review of 180 articles. Our findings suggest the following: (1) organizational characteristics, including technological capabilities, size, and industry type, significantly drive RW adoption in both BAU and disruptive environments; (2) crisis-induced RW exacerbates pre-existing demands while introducing novel stressors; these intensified and emergent demands consequently require leveraging existing resources and developing additional resources to mitigate adverse effects and promote positive employee outcomes; and (3) performance and well-being outcomes have been focal in both pre- and during-pandemic studies. This review highlights the profound impact of the pandemic on RW dynamics and offers practitioners actionable insights for navigating the evolving work landscape and future crises. A deeper understanding of the interplay between demands and resources will enable organizations to implement strategies that optimize resources, minimize demands, and ultimately enhance employee outcomes.

自2019冠状病毒病大流行以来，远程工作（RW）的采用急剧增加，促使组织探索新的工作模式，包括完全远程和混合安排。尽管对RW的研究越来越多，但我们对在“一切照旧”（BAU）和破坏性环境中推动组织采用RW的背景因素之间的概念和经验联系知之甚少。同样地，员工使用RW与RW影响员工绩效的机制之间的关系也没有得到很好的研究。通过结合对采用阶段以及使用和结果的检查，研究人员可以对RW有更细致的理解，从而为理论和实践提供信息。为此，我们在对180篇文章进行系统回顾的基础上，提出了一个基于技术-组织-环境框架和工作需求-资源模型的基于证据的综合RW框架。研究结果表明：(1)组织特征，包括技术能力、规模和行业类型，在BAU和颠覆性环境中显著推动了RW的采用；(2)危机诱导的RW在引入新的压力源的同时加剧了已有的需求；因此，这些强化的紧急需求需要利用现有资源并开发额外资源，以减轻不利影响并促进积极的员工成果；(3)在大流行之前和期间的研究中，表现和健康结果一直是重点。本次审查强调了疫情对劳动劳动动态的深刻影响，并为从业人员提供了应对不断变化的工作环境和未来危机的可行见解。更深入地了解需求和资源之间的相互作用将使组织能够实施优化资源、最小化需求并最终提高员工成果的战略。

{"title":"An integrated framework of remote work from organizational adoption to employee outcomes: A systematic literature review","authors":"Tahrima Ferdous, Muhammad Ali, Kevin C. Desouza, Erica French","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.70002","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ijmr.70002","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The adoption of remote work (RW) has surged dramatically since the COVID-19 pandemic, prompting organizations to explore new work models, including fully remote and hybrid arrangements. Despite a growing body of research on RW, we know little about the conceptual and empirical connections between contextual factors driving its organizational adoption in both business-as-usual (BAU) and disruptive environments. Similarly, the relationship between RW's use by employees and the mechanisms by which RW influences employee outcomes has not been well studied. By incorporating an examination of the adoption stage alongside use and outcomes, researchers can develop a more nuanced understanding of RW that informs theory and practice. To this end, we propose an integrated evidence-based RW framework grounded in the technology–organization–environment framework and job demands–resources model, based on a systematic review of 180 articles. Our findings suggest the following: (1) organizational characteristics, including technological capabilities, size, and industry type, significantly drive RW adoption in both BAU and disruptive environments; (2) crisis-induced RW exacerbates pre-existing demands while introducing novel stressors; these intensified and emergent demands consequently require leveraging existing resources and developing additional resources to mitigate adverse effects and promote positive employee outcomes; and (3) performance and well-being outcomes have been focal in both pre- and during-pandemic studies. This review highlights the profound impact of the pandemic on RW dynamics and offers practitioners actionable insights for navigating the evolving work landscape and future crises. A deeper understanding of the interplay between demands and resources will enable organizations to implement strategies that optimize resources, minimize demands, and ultimately enhance employee outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijmr.70002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144748207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0