Examining the role of common variants in rare neurodevelopmental conditions

IF 50.5 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Nature Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1038/s41586-024-08217-y
Qin Qin Huang, Emilie M. Wigdor, Daniel S. Malawsky, Patrick Campbell, Kaitlin E. Samocha, V. Kartik Chundru, Petr Danecek, Sarah Lindsay, Thomas Marchant, Mahmoud Koko, Sana Amanat, Davide Bonfanti, Eamonn Sheridan, Elizabeth J. Radford, Jeffrey C. Barrett, Caroline F. Wright, Helen V. Firth, Varun Warrier, Alexander Strudwick Young, Matthew E. Hurles, Hilary C. Martin
{"title":"Examining the role of common variants in rare neurodevelopmental conditions","authors":"Qin Qin Huang, Emilie M. Wigdor, Daniel S. Malawsky, Patrick Campbell, Kaitlin E. Samocha, V. Kartik Chundru, Petr Danecek, Sarah Lindsay, Thomas Marchant, Mahmoud Koko, Sana Amanat, Davide Bonfanti, Eamonn Sheridan, Elizabeth J. Radford, Jeffrey C. Barrett, Caroline F. Wright, Helen V. Firth, Varun Warrier, Alexander Strudwick Young, Matthew E. Hurles, Hilary C. Martin","doi":"10.1038/s41586-024-08217-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although rare neurodevelopmental conditions have a large Mendelian component<sup>1</sup>, common genetic variants also contribute to risk<sup>2,3</sup>. However, little is known about how this polygenic risk is distributed among patients with these conditions and their parents nor its interplay with rare variants. It is also unclear whether polygenic background affects risk directly through alleles transmitted from parents to children, or whether indirect genetic effects mediated through the family environment<sup>4</sup> also play a role. Here we addressed these questions using genetic data from 11,573 patients with rare neurodevelopmental conditions, 9,128 of their parents and 26,869 controls. Common variants explained around 10% of variance in risk. Patients with a monogenic diagnosis had significantly less polygenic risk than those without, supporting a liability threshold model<sup>5</sup>. A polygenic score for neurodevelopmental conditions showed only a direct genetic effect. By contrast, polygenic scores for educational attainment and cognitive performance showed no direct genetic effect, but the non-transmitted alleles in the parents were correlated with the child’s risk, potentially due to indirect genetic effects and/or parental assortment for these traits<sup>4</sup>. Indeed, as expected under parental assortment, we show that common variant predisposition for neurodevelopmental conditions is correlated with the rare variant component of risk. These findings indicate that future studies should investigate the possible role and nature of indirect genetic effects on rare neurodevelopmental conditions, and consider the contribution of common and rare variants simultaneously when studying cognition-related phenotypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18787,"journal":{"name":"Nature","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08217-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although rare neurodevelopmental conditions have a large Mendelian component1, common genetic variants also contribute to risk2,3. However, little is known about how this polygenic risk is distributed among patients with these conditions and their parents nor its interplay with rare variants. It is also unclear whether polygenic background affects risk directly through alleles transmitted from parents to children, or whether indirect genetic effects mediated through the family environment4 also play a role. Here we addressed these questions using genetic data from 11,573 patients with rare neurodevelopmental conditions, 9,128 of their parents and 26,869 controls. Common variants explained around 10% of variance in risk. Patients with a monogenic diagnosis had significantly less polygenic risk than those without, supporting a liability threshold model5. A polygenic score for neurodevelopmental conditions showed only a direct genetic effect. By contrast, polygenic scores for educational attainment and cognitive performance showed no direct genetic effect, but the non-transmitted alleles in the parents were correlated with the child’s risk, potentially due to indirect genetic effects and/or parental assortment for these traits4. Indeed, as expected under parental assortment, we show that common variant predisposition for neurodevelopmental conditions is correlated with the rare variant component of risk. These findings indicate that future studies should investigate the possible role and nature of indirect genetic effects on rare neurodevelopmental conditions, and consider the contribution of common and rare variants simultaneously when studying cognition-related phenotypes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究常见变异在罕见神经发育疾病中的作用
虽然罕见的神经发育疾病有很大的孟德尔成分1 ,但常见的遗传变异也会造成风险2,3。然而,人们对这种多基因风险在这些疾病患者及其父母中的分布情况以及与罕见变异的相互作用知之甚少。此外,还不清楚多基因背景是通过从父母传给子女的等位基因直接影响风险,还是通过家庭环境4 间接的遗传效应也起了作用。在此,我们利用来自 11,573 名罕见神经发育疾病患者、9,128 名患者父母和 26,869 名对照者的基因数据来解决这些问题。常见变异解释了约 10% 的风险变异。单基因诊断患者的多基因风险明显低于非单基因诊断患者,支持责任阈值模型5。神经发育状况的多基因评分仅显示出直接的遗传效应。相比之下,教育程度和认知能力的多基因评分没有显示出直接的遗传效应,但父母的非传递等位基因与子女的风险相关,这可能是由于间接的遗传效应和/或父母对这些性状的分类4。事实上,正如我们所预期的那样,我们的研究表明,神经发育状况的常见变异易感性与风险的罕见变异成分相关。这些研究结果表明,未来的研究应调查间接遗传效应对罕见神经发育病症的可能作用和性质,并在研究认知相关表型时同时考虑常见变异和罕见变异的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nature
Nature 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
90.00
自引率
1.20%
发文量
3652
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Nature is a prestigious international journal that publishes peer-reviewed research in various scientific and technological fields. The selection of articles is based on criteria such as originality, importance, interdisciplinary relevance, timeliness, accessibility, elegance, and surprising conclusions. In addition to showcasing significant scientific advances, Nature delivers rapid, authoritative, insightful news, and interpretation of current and upcoming trends impacting science, scientists, and the broader public. The journal serves a dual purpose: firstly, to promptly share noteworthy scientific advances and foster discussions among scientists, and secondly, to ensure the swift dissemination of scientific results globally, emphasizing their significance for knowledge, culture, and daily life.
期刊最新文献
New schizophrenia drug could treat Alzheimer’s disease I had three children during my PhD: here’s what I learnt Notching up a win: fresh tools for activating Notch AI could pose pandemic-scale biosecurity risks. Here’s how to make it safer Leading Nature Index science cities in Earth and environmental science: Research output gathers pace in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1