Unveiling the blackbox within ESG ratings' blackbox: Toward a framework for analyzing AI adoption and its impacts

IF 4.8 Q1 BUSINESS Business Strategy and Development Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1002/bsd2.70038
Felipe Suárez Giri, Teresa Sánchez Chaparro
{"title":"Unveiling the blackbox within ESG ratings' blackbox: Toward a framework for analyzing AI adoption and its impacts","authors":"Felipe Suárez Giri,&nbsp;Teresa Sánchez Chaparro","doi":"10.1002/bsd2.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming entire industries at an unprecedented pace. Yet, established technology adoption theories offer limited tools for characterizing business AI integration and analyzing its effects. These primarily focus on the factors facilitating or hindering adoption, rather than on adoption patterns and impacts. This paper introduces a novel conceptual framework to address this key gap and applies it to the case of the ESG rating industry. ESG raters play a pivotal role in sustainable finance, providing metrics that guide investment decisions globally. However, little is known about the extent and nature of their AI usage and its implications. Through a mixed-methods approach combining the analysis of job postings, patent filings, research publications, and corporate websites, we examine AI adoption among major ESG raters. Our investigation explores the specific AI technologies employed, their functional applications, the innovations developed, the intensity of AI integration, and the potential impacts of raters' AI adoption. Our results reveal widespread and growing AI adoption across the industry. Our findings show that raters extensively leverage Natural Language Processing to streamline data collection, processing, and analysis. Furthermore, they have pioneered Machine Learning innovations that significantly expand their sustainability assessment capabilities in various domains. These findings mark a considerable departure from prior academic and gray literature that characterized major ESG raters as having minimal AI use, prompting critical questions regarding the implications of this technological transformation for ESG ratings' reliability, transparency, and potential biases.</p>","PeriodicalId":36531,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and Development","volume":"7 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bsd2.70038","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bsd2.70038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming entire industries at an unprecedented pace. Yet, established technology adoption theories offer limited tools for characterizing business AI integration and analyzing its effects. These primarily focus on the factors facilitating or hindering adoption, rather than on adoption patterns and impacts. This paper introduces a novel conceptual framework to address this key gap and applies it to the case of the ESG rating industry. ESG raters play a pivotal role in sustainable finance, providing metrics that guide investment decisions globally. However, little is known about the extent and nature of their AI usage and its implications. Through a mixed-methods approach combining the analysis of job postings, patent filings, research publications, and corporate websites, we examine AI adoption among major ESG raters. Our investigation explores the specific AI technologies employed, their functional applications, the innovations developed, the intensity of AI integration, and the potential impacts of raters' AI adoption. Our results reveal widespread and growing AI adoption across the industry. Our findings show that raters extensively leverage Natural Language Processing to streamline data collection, processing, and analysis. Furthermore, they have pioneered Machine Learning innovations that significantly expand their sustainability assessment capabilities in various domains. These findings mark a considerable departure from prior academic and gray literature that characterized major ESG raters as having minimal AI use, prompting critical questions regarding the implications of this technological transformation for ESG ratings' reliability, transparency, and potential biases.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭开 ESG 评级黑箱中的黑箱:建立分析人工智能应用及其影响的框架
人工智能(AI)正以前所未有的速度改变着整个行业。然而,既有的技术采用理论在描述企业人工智能整合的特征和分析其影响方面提供的工具有限。这些理论主要侧重于促进或阻碍采用的因素,而不是采用模式和影响。本文引入了一个新颖的概念框架来解决这一关键问题,并将其应用于 ESG 评级行业。环境、社会和公司治理评级机构在可持续金融领域发挥着举足轻重的作用,为全球投资决策提供指导性指标。然而,人们对他们使用人工智能的程度和性质及其影响知之甚少。我们采用混合方法,结合对招聘信息、专利申请、研究出版物和企业网站的分析,研究了主要 ESG 评级机构采用人工智能的情况。我们的调查探讨了所采用的具体人工智能技术、其功能应用、开发的创新、人工智能整合的强度以及评级机构采用人工智能的潜在影响。我们的研究结果表明,人工智能在整个行业的应用非常广泛,而且还在不断增长。我们的研究结果表明,评级机构广泛利用自然语言处理技术来简化数据收集、处理和分析。此外,他们还率先进行了机器学习创新,大大扩展了他们在各个领域的可持续性评估能力。这些发现与之前的学术和灰色文献有很大不同,之前的学术和灰色文献将主要的 ESG 评级机构描述为极少使用人工智能,这就引发了一些关键问题,即这一技术变革对 ESG 评级的可靠性、透明度和潜在偏差的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Business Strategy and Development
Business Strategy and Development Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the blackbox within ESG ratings' blackbox: Toward a framework for analyzing AI adoption and its impacts Strategic management of employee churn: Leveraging machine learning for sustainable development and competitive advantage in emerging markets Corporate sustainability commitment in the Middle East and North Africa region: Impact on innovation and firm performance Beyond aroma: A sustainability performance analysis of Italian coffee roasting companies ESG risk, CEO education and gender: Evidence from Southeast Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1