Health Care Provider E-Cigarette-Related Advice and E-Cigarette Harm Perceptions Among Youth.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1177/08901171241301971
Osayande Agbonlahor, Delvon T Mattingly, Joy L Hart, Alison C McLeish, Kandi L Walker
{"title":"Health Care Provider E-Cigarette-Related Advice and E-Cigarette Harm Perceptions Among Youth.","authors":"Osayande Agbonlahor, Delvon T Mattingly, Joy L Hart, Alison C McLeish, Kandi L Walker","doi":"10.1177/08901171241301971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Health care providers (HCP) are uniquely positioned to advise against electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use, potentially influencing youth perceptions of e-cigarette harms. However, research examining these associations is scant. We examined whether HCP e-cigarette-related advice is associated with youth e-cigarette harm perceptions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>National Youth Tobacco Survey data (2022).</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>21,254 youth aged 9-18 years.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>E-cigarette harm perceptions (i.e., relative addictiveness, occasional use harm, and secondhand e-cigarette aerosol (SHA) harm) and HCP advice to abstain from using e-cigarettes (yes/no) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Adjusted odds ratios were estimated using multinomial logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the sample, 33.9% perceived e-cigarettes as equally addictive to cigarettes, 39.9% perceived occasional e-cigarette use to cause a lot of harm, and 23.3% perceived SHA to cause a lot of harm. Youth who received HCP advice had higher odds of perceiving e-cigarettes as more addictive than cigarettes (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.35-2.00) and causing a lot of harm (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.16-1.90). Youth who received HCP advice had higher odds of perceiving SHA causing little harm (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.04-1.44).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HCP advice was associated with youth e-cigarette harm perceptions and perceptions that SHA causes little harm. HCP e-cigarette counseling may help inform understanding of harms, which may reduce or prevent use.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171241301971"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241301971","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Health care providers (HCP) are uniquely positioned to advise against electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use, potentially influencing youth perceptions of e-cigarette harms. However, research examining these associations is scant. We examined whether HCP e-cigarette-related advice is associated with youth e-cigarette harm perceptions.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: National Youth Tobacco Survey data (2022).

Subjects: 21,254 youth aged 9-18 years.

Measures: E-cigarette harm perceptions (i.e., relative addictiveness, occasional use harm, and secondhand e-cigarette aerosol (SHA) harm) and HCP advice to abstain from using e-cigarettes (yes/no) were assessed.

Analysis: Adjusted odds ratios were estimated using multinomial logistic regression models.

Results: Among the sample, 33.9% perceived e-cigarettes as equally addictive to cigarettes, 39.9% perceived occasional e-cigarette use to cause a lot of harm, and 23.3% perceived SHA to cause a lot of harm. Youth who received HCP advice had higher odds of perceiving e-cigarettes as more addictive than cigarettes (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.35-2.00) and causing a lot of harm (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.16-1.90). Youth who received HCP advice had higher odds of perceiving SHA causing little harm (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.04-1.44).

Conclusion: HCP advice was associated with youth e-cigarette harm perceptions and perceptions that SHA causes little harm. HCP e-cigarette counseling may help inform understanding of harms, which may reduce or prevent use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健提供者与电子烟相关的建议和青少年对电子烟危害的看法。
目的:医疗保健提供者(HCP)在建议青少年不要使用电子烟方面具有独特的优势,可能会影响青少年对电子烟危害的看法。然而,有关这些关联的研究却很少。我们研究了保健医生的电子烟相关建议是否与青少年的电子烟危害认知相关:设计:横断面研究:受试者:21254 名 9-18 岁的青少年:对电子烟危害认知(即相对成瘾性、偶尔使用危害和二手电子烟气溶胶(SHA)危害)和HCP关于戒烟的建议(是/否)进行评估:分析:使用多叉逻辑回归模型估算调整后的几率比:在样本中,33.9%的人认为电子烟与香烟同样容易上瘾,39.9%的人认为偶尔使用电子烟会造成很大伤害,23.3%的人认为偶尔使用电子烟会造成很大伤害。接受过保健医生建议的青少年认为电子烟比香烟更容易上瘾(OR:1.64,95% CI:1.35-2.00)和造成很大伤害(OR:1.49,95% CI:1.16-1.90)的几率更高。接受保健医生建议的青少年认为 SHA 危害小的几率更高(OR:1.23,95% CI:1.04-1.44):结论:保健咨询师的建议与青少年对电子烟危害的认知以及对 SHA 危害较小的认知有关。保健咨询师提供的电子烟咨询可能有助于了解电子烟的危害,从而减少或预防电子烟的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
In Brief. The 'Natural' Accord of DuBois and Washington: An Environmentally Racialized Consciousness. Multi-Family Housing Environment and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Misaligned Supports: Differences in Reported Health Care Worker Well-being Supports Provided and Needed During the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Family-Based Approach to Promoting Pediatric Mental Health Recovery in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1