Jocelyn E Jarvis, Jacqueline Perez, David Himmelgreen, Amber D Dumford, Kyaien Conner, Marilyn Stern, Rita DeBate
{"title":"Test Validity of a Single-Item Food Insecurity Screening Assessment Among College Students.","authors":"Jocelyn E Jarvis, Jacqueline Perez, David Himmelgreen, Amber D Dumford, Kyaien Conner, Marilyn Stern, Rita DeBate","doi":"10.1177/08901171241302001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Given the high prevalence of food insecurity among college students, there is an interest in identifying whether the use of a single item can adequately screen for food insecurity. The current study aimed to determine the validity of a single-item food insecurity screening question among college students.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study exploring food insecurity among racial and ethnic undergraduate college students.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Large urban U.S. research university.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>Undergraduate students (n = 667) 18 years or older.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Food Insecurity screening was assessed via a single-item from the USDA Household Food Security Short Form (USDA FSSM-SF). Food security was assessed via the USDA FSSM-SF, a validated six-item scale that assesses food insecurity and hunger.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Logistic regression assessed the validity of the single-item food insecurity question tested against the USDA FSSM-SF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The full model was statistically significant, χ2(1) = 161.44, <i>P</i> < .001 explaining 54.5% of the variance in food insecurity status correctly classifying 95.7% of cases. Sensitivity of the model was found to be 97.6%; specificity was found to be 69.6%. Positive predictive value was calculated to be 97.74%; negative predictive value was computed to be 68.09%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results support for the test validity of a single-item screening question that can be used to detect food insecurity among college students and inform secondary prevention programs aimed at food insecurity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171241302001"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241302001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Given the high prevalence of food insecurity among college students, there is an interest in identifying whether the use of a single item can adequately screen for food insecurity. The current study aimed to determine the validity of a single-item food insecurity screening question among college students.
Design: Cross-sectional study exploring food insecurity among racial and ethnic undergraduate college students.
Setting: Large urban U.S. research university.
Sample: Undergraduate students (n = 667) 18 years or older.
Measures: Food Insecurity screening was assessed via a single-item from the USDA Household Food Security Short Form (USDA FSSM-SF). Food security was assessed via the USDA FSSM-SF, a validated six-item scale that assesses food insecurity and hunger.
Analysis: Logistic regression assessed the validity of the single-item food insecurity question tested against the USDA FSSM-SF.
Results: The full model was statistically significant, χ2(1) = 161.44, P < .001 explaining 54.5% of the variance in food insecurity status correctly classifying 95.7% of cases. Sensitivity of the model was found to be 97.6%; specificity was found to be 69.6%. Positive predictive value was calculated to be 97.74%; negative predictive value was computed to be 68.09%.
Conclusion: Results support for the test validity of a single-item screening question that can be used to detect food insecurity among college students and inform secondary prevention programs aimed at food insecurity.
期刊介绍:
The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.