Anomaly-based threat detection in smart health using machine learning.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1186/s12911-024-02760-4
Muntaha Tabassum, Saba Mahmood, Amal Bukhari, Bader Alshemaimri, Ali Daud, Fatima Khalique
{"title":"Anomaly-based threat detection in smart health using machine learning.","authors":"Muntaha Tabassum, Saba Mahmood, Amal Bukhari, Bader Alshemaimri, Ali Daud, Fatima Khalique","doi":"10.1186/s12911-024-02760-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anomaly detection is crucial in healthcare data due to challenges associated with the integration of smart technologies and healthcare. Anomaly in electronic health record can be associated with an insider trying to access and manipulate the data. This article focuses around the anomalies under different contexts.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This research has proposed methodology to secure Electronic Health Records (EHRs) within a complex environment. We have employed a systematic approach encompassing data preprocessing, labeling, modeling, and evaluation. Anomalies are not labelled thus a mechanism is required that predicts them with greater accuracy and less false positive results. This research utilized unsupervised machine learning algorithms that includes Isolation Forest and Local Outlier Factor clustering algorithms. By calculating anomaly scores and validating clustering through metrics like the Silhouette Score and Dunn Score, we enhanced the capacity to secure sensitive healthcare data evolving digital threats. Three variations of Isolation Forest (IForest)models (SVM, Decision Tree, and Random Forest) and three variations of Local Outlier Factor (LOF) models (SVM, Decision Tree, and Random Forest) are evaluated based on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 Score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Isolation Forest SVM achieves the highest accuracy of 99.21%, high sensitivity (99.75%) and specificity (99.32%), and a commendable F1 Score of 98.72%. The Isolation Forest Decision Tree also performs well with an accuracy of 98.92% and an F1 Score of 99.35%. However, the Isolation Forest Random Forest exhibits lower specificity (72.84%) than the other models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The experimental results reveal that Isolation Forest SVM emerges as the top performer showcasing the effectiveness of these models in anomaly detection tasks. The proposed methodology utilizing isolation forest and SVM produced better results by detecting anomalies with less false positives in this specific EHR of a hospital in North England. Furthermore the proposal is also able to identify new contextual anomalies that were not identified in the baseline methodology.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"24 1","pages":"347"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02760-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anomaly detection is crucial in healthcare data due to challenges associated with the integration of smart technologies and healthcare. Anomaly in electronic health record can be associated with an insider trying to access and manipulate the data. This article focuses around the anomalies under different contexts.

Methodology: This research has proposed methodology to secure Electronic Health Records (EHRs) within a complex environment. We have employed a systematic approach encompassing data preprocessing, labeling, modeling, and evaluation. Anomalies are not labelled thus a mechanism is required that predicts them with greater accuracy and less false positive results. This research utilized unsupervised machine learning algorithms that includes Isolation Forest and Local Outlier Factor clustering algorithms. By calculating anomaly scores and validating clustering through metrics like the Silhouette Score and Dunn Score, we enhanced the capacity to secure sensitive healthcare data evolving digital threats. Three variations of Isolation Forest (IForest)models (SVM, Decision Tree, and Random Forest) and three variations of Local Outlier Factor (LOF) models (SVM, Decision Tree, and Random Forest) are evaluated based on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 Score.

Results: Isolation Forest SVM achieves the highest accuracy of 99.21%, high sensitivity (99.75%) and specificity (99.32%), and a commendable F1 Score of 98.72%. The Isolation Forest Decision Tree also performs well with an accuracy of 98.92% and an F1 Score of 99.35%. However, the Isolation Forest Random Forest exhibits lower specificity (72.84%) than the other models.

Conclusion: The experimental results reveal that Isolation Forest SVM emerges as the top performer showcasing the effectiveness of these models in anomaly detection tasks. The proposed methodology utilizing isolation forest and SVM produced better results by detecting anomalies with less false positives in this specific EHR of a hospital in North England. Furthermore the proposal is also able to identify new contextual anomalies that were not identified in the baseline methodology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习在智能健康领域进行基于异常的威胁检测。
背景:由于智能技术与医疗保健的融合带来的挑战,异常检测对医疗保健数据至关重要。电子健康记录中的异常可能与内部人员试图访问和操纵数据有关。本文主要围绕不同背景下的异常情况展开:本研究提出了在复杂环境中确保电子健康记录(EHR)安全的方法。我们采用的系统方法包括数据预处理、标记、建模和评估。异常情况没有标签,因此需要一种机制来预测异常情况,以提高准确率,减少误报。这项研究采用了无监督机器学习算法,包括隔离林和局部离群因子聚类算法。通过计算异常分数,并通过 Silhouette Score 和 Dunn Score 等指标验证聚类,我们提高了保护敏感医疗保健数据的能力,使数字威胁不断演变。我们根据准确性、灵敏度、特异性和 F1 分数对三种不同的隔离森林(IForest)模型(SVM、决策树和随机森林)和三种不同的局部离群因子(LOF)模型(SVM、决策树和随机森林)进行了评估:隔离森林 SVM 的准确率最高,达到 99.21%,灵敏度(99.75%)和特异度(99.32%)都很高,F1 分数也达到了 98.72%。隔离森林决策树也表现出色,准确率为 98.92%,F1 得分为 99.35%。然而,Isolation Forest 随机森林的特异性(72.84%)低于其他模型:实验结果表明,Isolation Forest SVM 在异常检测任务中表现最出色,展示了这些模型的有效性。利用隔离林和 SVM 提出的方法在英格兰北部一家医院的特定电子病历中以较少的误报率检测出异常,从而取得了更好的效果。此外,该建议还能识别出基线方法未识别出的新的上下文异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
期刊最新文献
Creating a data warehouse to support monitoring of NSQHS blood management standard from EMR data. Multimodal machine learning for language and speech markers identification in mental health. Screening for severe coronary stenosis in patients with apparently normal electrocardiograms based on deep learning. Healthcare dashboard technologies and data visualization for lipid management: A scoping review. Predictive model for congenital heart disease in children of Pakistan by using structural equation modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1