Precision medicine in diabetes care.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Current Opinion in Endocrinology & Diabetes and Obesity Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1097/MED.0000000000000894
Si Hua Clara Tan, Wann Jia Loh, Su Chi Lim
{"title":"Precision medicine in diabetes care.","authors":"Si Hua Clara Tan, Wann Jia Loh, Su Chi Lim","doi":"10.1097/MED.0000000000000894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review highlights emerging evidence supporting the premise of precision diabetes care including but not limited to monogenic diabetes and discuss potential opportunities, challenges, and limitations for clinical adoption.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Driven by a single gene mutation, monogenic diabetes remains the best use-case for precision diabetes care. However, the increasing prevalence of diabetes among adolescents and young adults in an obesogenic environment makes triaging potential patients for genetic screening clinically challenging. High-dimensional molecular biomarkers (i.e., multiomics) can improve the risk prediction for incident type 2 diabetes (T2D), over and above a well established prediction model based on clinical variables alone. Machine learning approaches using clinical variable-based clustering methods have generated novel and reproducible T2D subgroups with distinct phenotypic and omics characteristics that are associated with differential long-term outcomes. This stratification-strategy may inform clinical decisions. However, on-going discussion and research will be needed to understand the clinical utility of sub-phenotyping T2D for precision care.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Precision diabetes care has extended from uncommon monogenic diabetes to T2D which will need more complex approaches like multiomics and machine-learning methods. The successful clinical translation will require cumulative evidence and close collaboration among the stake holders.</p>","PeriodicalId":10964,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Endocrinology & Diabetes and Obesity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Endocrinology & Diabetes and Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0000000000000894","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review highlights emerging evidence supporting the premise of precision diabetes care including but not limited to monogenic diabetes and discuss potential opportunities, challenges, and limitations for clinical adoption.

Recent findings: Driven by a single gene mutation, monogenic diabetes remains the best use-case for precision diabetes care. However, the increasing prevalence of diabetes among adolescents and young adults in an obesogenic environment makes triaging potential patients for genetic screening clinically challenging. High-dimensional molecular biomarkers (i.e., multiomics) can improve the risk prediction for incident type 2 diabetes (T2D), over and above a well established prediction model based on clinical variables alone. Machine learning approaches using clinical variable-based clustering methods have generated novel and reproducible T2D subgroups with distinct phenotypic and omics characteristics that are associated with differential long-term outcomes. This stratification-strategy may inform clinical decisions. However, on-going discussion and research will be needed to understand the clinical utility of sub-phenotyping T2D for precision care.

Summary: Precision diabetes care has extended from uncommon monogenic diabetes to T2D which will need more complex approaches like multiomics and machine-learning methods. The successful clinical translation will require cumulative evidence and close collaboration among the stake holders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病护理中的精准医疗。
综述的目的:本综述强调了支持糖尿病精准治疗前提的新兴证据,包括但不限于单基因糖尿病,并讨论了临床采用的潜在机遇、挑战和局限性:由单一基因突变驱动的单基因糖尿病仍是糖尿病精准治疗的最佳应用案例。然而,在肥胖的环境中,青少年和年轻人的糖尿病发病率越来越高,这使得临床上对潜在患者进行基因筛查具有挑战性。高维分子生物标志物(即多组学)可以改善对 2 型糖尿病(T2D)发病风险的预测,超过仅基于临床变量的成熟预测模型。使用基于临床变量的聚类方法的机器学习方法产生了新的、可重复的 T2D 亚组,这些亚组具有不同的表型和 omics 特征,与不同的长期结果相关。这种分层策略可为临床决策提供依据。摘要:糖尿病精准治疗已从不常出现的单基因糖尿病扩展到 T2D,这需要更复杂的方法,如多组学和机器学习方法。成功的临床转化需要累积证据和利益相关者之间的密切合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.10%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and exciting developments in the field from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring twelve key topics – including androgens, gastrointestinal hormones, diabetes and the endocrine pancreas, and neuroendocrinology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
期刊最新文献
Indications for testosterone therapy in men. Testosterone and male contraception. Time to cycle regularity and health risks. Male infertility and obesity. Testosterone and the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus: therapeutic implications from recent trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1