Intraoperative label-free tissue diagnostics using a stimulated Raman histology imaging system with artificial intelligence: An initial experience.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108646
Amin I Nohman, Meltem Ivren, Obada T Alhalabi, Felix Sahm, Philip Dao Trong, Sandro M Krieg, Andreas Unterberg, Moritz Scherer
{"title":"Intraoperative label-free tissue diagnostics using a stimulated Raman histology imaging system with artificial intelligence: An initial experience.","authors":"Amin I Nohman, Meltem Ivren, Obada T Alhalabi, Felix Sahm, Philip Dao Trong, Sandro M Krieg, Andreas Unterberg, Moritz Scherer","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate intraoperative tissue diagnostics could impact on decision making regarding the extent of resection (EOR) during brain tumor surgery. Stimulated Raman histology (SRH) is a label-free optical imaging method that uses different biochemical properties of tissue to generate a hematoxylin-eosin-like image and, in combination with an artificial intelligence-based image classifier, offers the opportunity to obtain rapid intraoperative tissue diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study was to report on our initial experience with SRH to evaluate its accuracy in comparison to final tissue diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>We evaluated 70 consecutive adult cases with brain tumors. We compared results of the three different SRH classifier (diagnostic, molecular and tumor/non-tumor) to the respective final histopathological result. Similarly, we evaluated the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations in 18 patients using SRH. Lastly, we compared SRH results of samples taken from the tumor margins with early postoperative MRI. Prediction accuracy was evaluated by logistic regression and Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 19 gliomas, 9 metastases, 22 meningiomas and 14 other tumor entities. Regarding accuracy of intraoperative SRH predictions, regression analysis showed an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.77 (95 % C.I. 0.64-0.89, p = 0.0008), suggesting agreement of predictions with final diagnosis. For specific tumor entities, variable accuracies were observed: The highest accuracy was obtained for meningiomas followed by high-grade glioma. IDH mutations were predicted with an AUC of 0.93 (95 % C.I. 0.88-0.98; p < 0.0001). The SRH examination of tissue samples from tumor margins corresponded with postoperative MRI in 4 out of 5 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our initial experience with SRH shows that this novel imaging technique is a promising approach to obtain rapid intraoperative tissue diagnosis to guide surgical decision making based on histology and cell-density. With further refinement of AI-based automated image classification and a better integration into the surgical workflow, prediction accuracy and reliability could be improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"247 ","pages":"108646"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108646","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate intraoperative tissue diagnostics could impact on decision making regarding the extent of resection (EOR) during brain tumor surgery. Stimulated Raman histology (SRH) is a label-free optical imaging method that uses different biochemical properties of tissue to generate a hematoxylin-eosin-like image and, in combination with an artificial intelligence-based image classifier, offers the opportunity to obtain rapid intraoperative tissue diagnoses.

Objective: The goal of this study was to report on our initial experience with SRH to evaluate its accuracy in comparison to final tissue diagnosis.

Materials & methods: We evaluated 70 consecutive adult cases with brain tumors. We compared results of the three different SRH classifier (diagnostic, molecular and tumor/non-tumor) to the respective final histopathological result. Similarly, we evaluated the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations in 18 patients using SRH. Lastly, we compared SRH results of samples taken from the tumor margins with early postoperative MRI. Prediction accuracy was evaluated by logistic regression and Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) analysis.

Results: We included 19 gliomas, 9 metastases, 22 meningiomas and 14 other tumor entities. Regarding accuracy of intraoperative SRH predictions, regression analysis showed an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.77 (95 % C.I. 0.64-0.89, p = 0.0008), suggesting agreement of predictions with final diagnosis. For specific tumor entities, variable accuracies were observed: The highest accuracy was obtained for meningiomas followed by high-grade glioma. IDH mutations were predicted with an AUC of 0.93 (95 % C.I. 0.88-0.98; p < 0.0001). The SRH examination of tissue samples from tumor margins corresponded with postoperative MRI in 4 out of 5 cases.

Conclusion: Our initial experience with SRH shows that this novel imaging technique is a promising approach to obtain rapid intraoperative tissue diagnosis to guide surgical decision making based on histology and cell-density. With further refinement of AI-based automated image classification and a better integration into the surgical workflow, prediction accuracy and reliability could be improved.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用人工智能刺激拉曼组织学成像系统进行术中无标记组织诊断:初步经验。
背景:准确的术中组织诊断可影响脑肿瘤手术切除范围(EOR)的决策。受激拉曼组织学(SRH)是一种无标记的光学成像方法,它利用组织的不同生化特性生成类似苏木精-伊红的图像,并与基于人工智能的图像分类器相结合,提供了获得术中快速组织诊断的机会:本研究的目的是报告我们使用 SRH 的初步经验,评估其与最终组织诊断的准确性:我们对 70 例连续的成人脑肿瘤病例进行了评估。我们将三种不同的 SRH 分类器(诊断、分子和肿瘤/非肿瘤)的结果与相应的最终组织病理学结果进行了比较。同样,我们使用 SRH 评估了 18 例患者的异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)突变情况。最后,我们将肿瘤边缘样本的 SRH 结果与术后早期核磁共振成像结果进行了比较。通过逻辑回归和接收者操作曲线(ROC)分析评估了预测的准确性:我们纳入了 19 例胶质瘤、9 例转移瘤、22 例脑膜瘤和 14 例其他肿瘤实体。关于术中 SRH 预测的准确性,回归分析显示曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.77(95 % C.I. 0.64-0.89,p = 0.0008),表明预测与最终诊断一致。对于特定的肿瘤实体,观察到的准确率各不相同:脑膜瘤的准确率最高,其次是高级别胶质瘤。预测 IDH 突变的 AUC 为 0.93(95 % C.I. 0.88-0.98; p < 0.0001)。对肿瘤边缘组织样本进行的SRH检查与术后核磁共振成像结果相符的病例占5例中的4例:我们在 SRH 方面的初步经验表明,这种新型成像技术是一种很有前途的方法,可用于术中快速组织诊断,从而根据组织学和细胞密度指导手术决策。随着基于人工智能的自动图像分类技术的进一步完善,以及与手术工作流程的更好整合,预测的准确性和可靠性将得到提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
期刊最新文献
Treatment of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and multiple aneurysms: Concurrent versus delayed treatment. Behavioral pain scales, vital signs, and pupilometry to pain assessment in the critically ill patient: A cross sectional study. The effect of prognostic nutritional indices on stroke hospitalization outcomes. Intraoperative label-free tissue diagnostics using a stimulated Raman histology imaging system with artificial intelligence: An initial experience. Pediatric onset multiple sclerosis in Kuwait.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1