Translational Quotient as an Innovative Outcome Parameter to Assess the Effectiveness of Training Methods: A Feasibility Study in Assessing the Baseline Psychiatric Skills of Primary Care Doctors in their Real-world Live Outpatient Clinic.

IF 1.9 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1177/02537176241285170
Priyanka Singhal, Manik Inder Singh Sethi, Darshan Shadakshari, Shaktidevi G Rayaji, Aravind B A Banavaram, Melur Sukumar Gautham, Banandur S Pradeep, Narayana Manjunatha, Channaveerachari Naveen Kumar, Suresh Bada Math
{"title":"Translational Quotient as an Innovative Outcome Parameter to Assess the Effectiveness of Training Methods: A Feasibility Study in Assessing the Baseline Psychiatric Skills of Primary Care Doctors in their Real-world Live Outpatient Clinic.","authors":"Priyanka Singhal, Manik Inder Singh Sethi, Darshan Shadakshari, Shaktidevi G Rayaji, Aravind B A Banavaram, Melur Sukumar Gautham, Banandur S Pradeep, Narayana Manjunatha, Channaveerachari Naveen Kumar, Suresh Bada Math","doi":"10.1177/02537176241285170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness of training methods in medical education is critical, particularly for primary care physicians (PCPs) who frequently encounter psychiatric issues in their practice. Traditional assessment methods often fail to evaluate skill acquisition in real-world clinical practice. The Translational Quotient (TQ) is proposed as an innovative outcome measure to assess PCPs' ability to apply psychiatric skills in their live outpatient consultation among their general patients. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using the TQ in real-world outpatient clinics and to understand the baseline psychiatric skills among PCPs using TQ.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Actively practicing MBBS-qualified PCPs enrolled in the Diploma in Primary Care Psychiatry (DPCP) program across various districts were invited to participate. Baseline TQ assessments were conducted in the PCPs' live clinics, with psychiatrists observing live consultations either remotely or in-person for the first five consecutive general consultations. Each consultation was scored using a standardized TQ proforma, which evaluated six criteria: elicitation of psychiatric symptoms, clinical reasoning, medication choices, counseling, time management, and overall clinical skills.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 PCPs participated, with an average baseline TQ score of 15.7% (4.72 out of 30). Most participants (72%) scored 5 or less, highlighting significant gaps in psychiatric skills. Analysis revealed no significant associations between TQ scores and PCP demographics such as age, gender, and prior psychiatric training, but regional differences were noted, with lower scores in Karnataka compared to Bihar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TQ is a feasible and practical tool for assessing real-world psychiatric skills among PCPs. The baseline scores indicate a pressing need for targeted psychiatric training to bridge the treatment gap in primary care. Future training programs should focus on enhancing diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and patient communication to improve mental healthcare outcomes in primary care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13476,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"02537176241285170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572426/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176241285170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of training methods in medical education is critical, particularly for primary care physicians (PCPs) who frequently encounter psychiatric issues in their practice. Traditional assessment methods often fail to evaluate skill acquisition in real-world clinical practice. The Translational Quotient (TQ) is proposed as an innovative outcome measure to assess PCPs' ability to apply psychiatric skills in their live outpatient consultation among their general patients. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using the TQ in real-world outpatient clinics and to understand the baseline psychiatric skills among PCPs using TQ.

Methods: Actively practicing MBBS-qualified PCPs enrolled in the Diploma in Primary Care Psychiatry (DPCP) program across various districts were invited to participate. Baseline TQ assessments were conducted in the PCPs' live clinics, with psychiatrists observing live consultations either remotely or in-person for the first five consecutive general consultations. Each consultation was scored using a standardized TQ proforma, which evaluated six criteria: elicitation of psychiatric symptoms, clinical reasoning, medication choices, counseling, time management, and overall clinical skills.

Results: A total of 25 PCPs participated, with an average baseline TQ score of 15.7% (4.72 out of 30). Most participants (72%) scored 5 or less, highlighting significant gaps in psychiatric skills. Analysis revealed no significant associations between TQ scores and PCP demographics such as age, gender, and prior psychiatric training, but regional differences were noted, with lower scores in Karnataka compared to Bihar.

Conclusions: The TQ is a feasible and practical tool for assessing real-world psychiatric skills among PCPs. The baseline scores indicate a pressing need for targeted psychiatric training to bridge the treatment gap in primary care. Future training programs should focus on enhancing diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and patient communication to improve mental healthcare outcomes in primary care settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将转化商数作为评估培训方法有效性的创新结果参数:在真实世界的现场门诊中评估初级保健医生精神科技能基线的可行性研究。
背景:医学教育中培训方法的有效性至关重要,尤其是对于在实践中经常遇到精神问题的初级保健医生(PCPs)而言。传统的评估方法往往无法评估实际临床实践中的技能掌握情况。我们提出了转化商数(TQ)作为一种创新的结果测量方法,用于评估初级保健医生在普通患者的现场门诊咨询中应用精神科技能的能力。本研究旨在评估在实际门诊中使用 TQ 的可行性,并了解使用 TQ 的初级保健医生的基本精神科技能:方法:邀请在各地区参加初级保健精神病学文凭(DPCP)课程的具有 MBBS 执业资格的初级保健医生参加。基线 TQ 评估在初级保健医生的现场诊所进行,精神科医生远程或亲自观察前五次连续普通会诊的现场会诊情况。每次会诊都使用标准化的 TQ 表进行评分,该表评估六项标准:精神症状的诱导、临床推理、药物选择、咨询、时间管理和整体临床技能:共有 25 名初级保健医生参与,TQ 平均基线得分率为 15.7%(满分 30 分,即 4.72 分)。大多数参与者(72%)的得分都在 5 分或 5 分以下,这表明他们在精神科技能方面存在很大差距。分析表明,TQ 分数与初级保健医生的人口统计学特征(如年龄、性别和以前接受过的精神病学培训)之间没有明显关联,但注意到了地区差异,卡纳塔克邦的得分低于比哈尔邦:结论:TQ 是评估初级保健医生实际精神科技能的可行且实用的工具。基线得分表明,迫切需要开展有针对性的精神科培训,以弥补初级保健中的治疗差距。未来的培训计划应侧重于提高诊断准确性、治疗计划和患者沟通,以改善初级医疗机构的精神卫生保健成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine (ISSN 0253-7176) was started in 1978 as the official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society South Zonal Branch. The journal allows free access (Open Access) and is published Bimonthly. The Journal includes but is not limited to review articles, original research, opinions, and letters. The Editor and publisher accept no legal responsibility for any opinions, omissions or errors by the authors, nor do they approve of any product advertised within the journal.
期刊最新文献
Buprenorphine Induced Nicolau Syndrome: A Case Report. Stress, Anxiety, and Depression in the First-year Students of Medical Education: A Prospective Cohort Study from a Women's Medical College in South India. Personality Dimension, Suicidal Intent, and Lethality: A Cross-sectional Study of Suicide Attempters with or Without Personality Disorders. Heart Rate Variability for Supplementing Withdrawal Assessment in Patients with Opioid Dependence: An Exploratory Study. The Many Faces of Guilt: A Review Mapping Unique and Overlapping Expressions in OCD and Depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1