Examining the joint effect of clinical quality, meaningful use of HIT and patient-caregiver interaction on mortality rates in US acute care hospitals.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal for Quality in Health Care Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzae104
Aber Elsaleiby
{"title":"Examining the joint effect of clinical quality, meaningful use of HIT and patient-caregiver interaction on mortality rates in US acute care hospitals.","authors":"Aber Elsaleiby","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzae104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare quality has long been defined and assessed using different theories that outline care delivery as a product of two factors; one being the clinical aspect symbolizing the science of care and the other being the non-clinical aspect symbolizing non-medicinal aspect of care delivery. To the best of our knowledge, the joint effect of the clinical, social and technological aspects of care on outcome quality has not been investigated in the literature. The current study empirically investigates the joint effect of the clinical, social and technological care quality dimensions on mortality rates through analyzing longitudinal data from 3081 US hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six-year data from more than 3000 acute care hospitals is analyzed using econometric analysis with two stage least square instrumental variable regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospitals that jointly focus on clinical, social and technological care dimensions realize lower mortality rates. Combining clinical quality (CM) with either meaningful use of health information technology (MUHIT) or patient-caregiver interaction (PCI) reduces mortality rates. The lowest mortality rate is realized when hospitals combine CM, PCI and MUHIT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study provides empirical evidence on the importance of combining clinical and non-clinical care measures to reduce mortality rates in hospitals. Our results indicate that hospitals that combine dual quality dimensions, clinical quality with either PCI or MUHIT, can also realize improvement in mortality rates. However, the best outcome can be realized by focusing on the triple quality dimensions (CM, PCI and MUHIT). The study provides pointers to healthcare professionals and policy makers on the impact of non-clinical care on the clinical-mortality link in hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzae104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare quality has long been defined and assessed using different theories that outline care delivery as a product of two factors; one being the clinical aspect symbolizing the science of care and the other being the non-clinical aspect symbolizing non-medicinal aspect of care delivery. To the best of our knowledge, the joint effect of the clinical, social and technological aspects of care on outcome quality has not been investigated in the literature. The current study empirically investigates the joint effect of the clinical, social and technological care quality dimensions on mortality rates through analyzing longitudinal data from 3081 US hospitals.

Methods: Six-year data from more than 3000 acute care hospitals is analyzed using econometric analysis with two stage least square instrumental variable regression models.

Results: Hospitals that jointly focus on clinical, social and technological care dimensions realize lower mortality rates. Combining clinical quality (CM) with either meaningful use of health information technology (MUHIT) or patient-caregiver interaction (PCI) reduces mortality rates. The lowest mortality rate is realized when hospitals combine CM, PCI and MUHIT.

Conclusion: Our study provides empirical evidence on the importance of combining clinical and non-clinical care measures to reduce mortality rates in hospitals. Our results indicate that hospitals that combine dual quality dimensions, clinical quality with either PCI or MUHIT, can also realize improvement in mortality rates. However, the best outcome can be realized by focusing on the triple quality dimensions (CM, PCI and MUHIT). The study provides pointers to healthcare professionals and policy makers on the impact of non-clinical care on the clinical-mortality link in hospitals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究临床质量、有意义地使用 HIT 以及患者与护理人员之间的互动对美国急症护理医院死亡率的共同影响。
背景:长期以来,人们一直使用不同的理论来定义和评估医疗质量,这些理论将医疗服务概括为两个因素的产物:一个是象征医疗科学的临床方面,另一个是象征医疗服务非医疗方面的非临床方面。据我们所知,文献中尚未研究过护理的临床、社会和技术方面对结果质量的共同影响。本研究通过分析 3081 家美国医院的纵向数据,实证研究了临床、社会和技术护理质量对死亡率的共同影响:方法:使用计量经济学分析方法,通过两阶段最小平方工具变量回归模型,对来自 3000 多家急症护理医院的六年数据进行分析:结果:共同关注临床、社会和技术护理方面的医院实现了较低的死亡率。将临床质量(CM)与有意义地使用医疗信息技术(MUHIT)或患者-护理人员互动(PCI)相结合,可降低死亡率。当医院将临床质量、PCI 和 MUHIT 结合起来时,死亡率最低:我们的研究为结合临床和非临床护理措施降低医院死亡率的重要性提供了经验证据。我们的研究结果表明,将临床质量与 PCI 或 MUHIT 这两个质量维度结合起来的医院也能实现死亡率的改善。然而,专注于三重质量维度(CM、PCI 和 MUHIT)可实现最佳结果。这项研究为医疗保健专业人员和政策制定者提供了关于非临床护理对医院临床与死亡率之间联系的影响的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Quality in Health Care makes activities and research related to quality and safety in health care available to a worldwide readership. The Journal publishes papers in all disciplines related to the quality and safety of health care, including health services research, health care evaluation, technology assessment, health economics, utilization review, cost containment, and nursing care research, as well as clinical research related to quality of care. This peer-reviewed journal is truly interdisciplinary and includes contributions from representatives of all health professions such as doctors, nurses, quality assurance professionals, managers, politicians, social workers, and therapists, as well as researchers from health-related backgrounds.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic performance of a newly launched Canadian fast-track ultrasound clinic by rheumatologists for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Exploring the Development of Safety Culture among Physicians with Text Mining of Patient Safety Reports: A Retrospective Study. Optimizing Neurosurgery Clinic Operations: A Comparative Study of Interventions in Finland's Public Healthcare System. Setting Standards in Residential Aged Care: Identifying Achievable Benchmarks of Care for Long-term Aged Care Services. The Influence Mechanism Analysis of Family Doctor Team Effectiveness: A Mixed-method Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1