Verifying models of the underwater soundscape from wind and ships with benchmark scenariosa).

IF 2.1 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ACOUSTICS Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1121/10.0026597
S Bruce Martin, Martin Siderius, Michael A Ainslie, Michele B Halvorsen, Leila Hatch, Mark K Prior, Daniel Brooker, James Caplinger, Christine Erbe, John Gebbie, Kevin D Heaney, Alexander O MacGillivray, Marie-Noel Matthews, Victor O Oppeneer, Alexandra Schäfke, Renée P Schoeman, H Özkan Sertlek
{"title":"Verifying models of the underwater soundscape from wind and ships with benchmark scenariosa).","authors":"S Bruce Martin, Martin Siderius, Michael A Ainslie, Michele B Halvorsen, Leila Hatch, Mark K Prior, Daniel Brooker, James Caplinger, Christine Erbe, John Gebbie, Kevin D Heaney, Alexander O MacGillivray, Marie-Noel Matthews, Victor O Oppeneer, Alexandra Schäfke, Renée P Schoeman, H Özkan Sertlek","doi":"10.1121/10.0026597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Models of the underwater acoustic soundscape are important for evaluating the effects of human generated sounds on marine life. The performance of models can be validated against measurements or verified against each other for consistency. A verification workshop was held to compare models that predict the soundscape from wind and vessels and estimate detection ranges for a submerged target. Eight modeling groups participated in the workshop which predicted sound levels with observation windows of 1 min and 1 km2. Substantial differences were found in how modelers computed the propagation losses for decidecade bands and estimated the source level of wind. Further investigations resulted in recommendations on best practices. Choices of temporal and spatial modeling resolution affected the estimates of metrics proportional to total sound energy more than distributions of sound pressure level. Deeper receivers were less sensitive to these parameters than shallow ones. A temporal resolution of 1 min and spatial resolution of 100 m is recommended. Models that follow the recommendations will yield similar results. The detection range of underwater targets is highly variable when the ambient noise depends on moving noise sources. Future work to verify models against data and understand model uncertainty is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"156 5","pages":"3422-3438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0026597","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Models of the underwater acoustic soundscape are important for evaluating the effects of human generated sounds on marine life. The performance of models can be validated against measurements or verified against each other for consistency. A verification workshop was held to compare models that predict the soundscape from wind and vessels and estimate detection ranges for a submerged target. Eight modeling groups participated in the workshop which predicted sound levels with observation windows of 1 min and 1 km2. Substantial differences were found in how modelers computed the propagation losses for decidecade bands and estimated the source level of wind. Further investigations resulted in recommendations on best practices. Choices of temporal and spatial modeling resolution affected the estimates of metrics proportional to total sound energy more than distributions of sound pressure level. Deeper receivers were less sensitive to these parameters than shallow ones. A temporal resolution of 1 min and spatial resolution of 100 m is recommended. Models that follow the recommendations will yield similar results. The detection range of underwater targets is highly variable when the ambient noise depends on moving noise sources. Future work to verify models against data and understand model uncertainty is recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用基准场景(benchmark scenariosa)验证来自风和船只的水下声景模型。
水下声学声景模型对于评估人类产生的声音对海洋生物的影响非常重要。模型的性能可以根据测量结果进行验证,也可以相互验证是否一致。举办了一次验证研讨会,对预测风和船只声景的模型进行比较,并对水下目标的探测范围进行估计。8 个建模小组参加了研讨会,以 1 分钟和 1 平方公里的观测窗口预测声级。发现建模者在计算十年波段的传播损失和估算风源水平方面存在很大差异。进一步的调查提出了最佳做法建议。时间和空间建模分辨率的选择对与总声能成正比的指标估算的影响比对声压级分布的影响更大。较深的接收器对这些参数的敏感度低于较浅的接收器。建议时间分辨率为 1 分钟,空间分辨率为 100 米。遵循这些建议的模型将得到相似的结果。当环境噪声取决于移动噪声源时,水下目标的探测距离变化很大。建议今后开展工作,根据数据验证模型并了解模型的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1433
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.
期刊最新文献
Ducting of wave-breaking sound by the sea surface bubble layer. Soundscape perception indices (SPIs): Developing context-dependent single value scores of multidimensional soundscape perceptual qualitya). The influence of dialect loss on tone perception: Diminishing voice quality cues in preserved tone contrast. Transcranial ultrasound modeling using the spectral-element method. Noise assessment of multirotor configurations during landing proceduresa).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1