Francesco Caroccia, Jovana Juloski, Jelena Juloski, Patrizia Marti, Flavio Lampus, Alessandro Vichi, Veronica Giuntini, Valentina Rutili, Michele Nieri, Cecilia Goracci, Lorenzo Franchi
{"title":"3D printed customized facemask for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a two-center case series feasibility study.","authors":"Francesco Caroccia, Jovana Juloski, Jelena Juloski, Patrizia Marti, Flavio Lampus, Alessandro Vichi, Veronica Giuntini, Valentina Rutili, Michele Nieri, Cecilia Goracci, Lorenzo Franchi","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6329.24.05013-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This prospective two-center case series feasibility study aimed to investigate the potential of a novel maxillary protraction facemask customized to the patients' anatomy recorded with 3D face scanning and then produced by digital design and additive manufacturing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten subjects (5 females and 5 males, average age 7.7±1.0 years) with Class III malocclusion were treated with a rapid maxillary expander (RME) and a Petit-type facemask (FM), whose components were digitally designed on a 3D scan of the patient's face. Subjects' face scans were obtained either with a tablet or with face scanner. FM components were modelled with a 3D software. The pads were 3D printed in biocompatible resin, and the bar was printed in stainless steel. A questionnaire investigating the patients' experience was filled in after the first week of treatment and after 3, 6, and 9 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The customized FM showed an excellent adaptation to the anatomy of the face. No severe complications were reported during the 9 months of appliance wearing. Some reversible episodes of skin irritation were reported below the pads, mainly in the chin area. The reported time wearing ranged between 8.2±2.3 and 9.5±1.2 hours per day, mainly at night. Reported pain was overall low (maximum after 1 week with an average value of 1.9±1.7 on a visual analog scale [VAS] 0-10) and patients' satisfaction was adequate at the end of the facemask wear after 9 months (8.7±1.4 on a VAS 0-10).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The customized FM was overall well accepted by the patients and represents a valid alternative to conventional ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":18709,"journal":{"name":"Minerva dental and oral science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva dental and oral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.24.05013-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This prospective two-center case series feasibility study aimed to investigate the potential of a novel maxillary protraction facemask customized to the patients' anatomy recorded with 3D face scanning and then produced by digital design and additive manufacturing.
Methods: Ten subjects (5 females and 5 males, average age 7.7±1.0 years) with Class III malocclusion were treated with a rapid maxillary expander (RME) and a Petit-type facemask (FM), whose components were digitally designed on a 3D scan of the patient's face. Subjects' face scans were obtained either with a tablet or with face scanner. FM components were modelled with a 3D software. The pads were 3D printed in biocompatible resin, and the bar was printed in stainless steel. A questionnaire investigating the patients' experience was filled in after the first week of treatment and after 3, 6, and 9 months.
Results: The customized FM showed an excellent adaptation to the anatomy of the face. No severe complications were reported during the 9 months of appliance wearing. Some reversible episodes of skin irritation were reported below the pads, mainly in the chin area. The reported time wearing ranged between 8.2±2.3 and 9.5±1.2 hours per day, mainly at night. Reported pain was overall low (maximum after 1 week with an average value of 1.9±1.7 on a visual analog scale [VAS] 0-10) and patients' satisfaction was adequate at the end of the facemask wear after 9 months (8.7±1.4 on a VAS 0-10).
Conclusions: The customized FM was overall well accepted by the patients and represents a valid alternative to conventional ones.