Development of machine learning models for predicting depressive symptoms in knee osteoarthritis patients.

IF 3.8 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Scientific Reports Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-79601-x
Dan Li, Han Lu, Junhui Wu, Hongbo Chen, Meidi Shen, Beibei Tong, Wen Zeng, Weixuan Wang, Shaomei Shang
{"title":"Development of machine learning models for predicting depressive symptoms in knee osteoarthritis patients.","authors":"Dan Li, Han Lu, Junhui Wu, Hongbo Chen, Meidi Shen, Beibei Tong, Wen Zeng, Weixuan Wang, Shaomei Shang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-79601-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) combined with depressive symptoms is prevalent and leads to poor outcomes and significant financial burdens. However, practical tools for identifying at-risk patients remain limited. A robust prediction model is needed to address this gap. This study aims to develop and validate a predictive model to identify KOA patients at risk of developing depressive symptoms. The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey (CHARLS) data were used for model development and the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) for external validation. 18 potential predictors were selected using LASSO regression. 4 machine learning models-logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, and artificial neural network-were developed. Model performance was assessed using the area under the operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. The most important features were extracted from the optimal model on external validation. A total of 469 individuals were included, with 70% used for training and 30% for testing. The random forest model achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.928 in the test set, outperforming logistic regression (AUC 0.622), decision tree (AUC 0.611), and neural network models (AUC 0.868). External validation revealed an AUC of 0.877 (95% CI: 0.864-0.889) for the adjusted random forest model. Pain severity was the most significant predictor, followed by the five-time sit-to-stand test (FTSST) and sleep problems. This study is the first in China to apply a predictive model for depressive symptoms in KOA patients, offering a practical tool for early risk identification using routinely available data.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"14 1","pages":"28603"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79601-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) combined with depressive symptoms is prevalent and leads to poor outcomes and significant financial burdens. However, practical tools for identifying at-risk patients remain limited. A robust prediction model is needed to address this gap. This study aims to develop and validate a predictive model to identify KOA patients at risk of developing depressive symptoms. The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey (CHARLS) data were used for model development and the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) for external validation. 18 potential predictors were selected using LASSO regression. 4 machine learning models-logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, and artificial neural network-were developed. Model performance was assessed using the area under the operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. The most important features were extracted from the optimal model on external validation. A total of 469 individuals were included, with 70% used for training and 30% for testing. The random forest model achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.928 in the test set, outperforming logistic regression (AUC 0.622), decision tree (AUC 0.611), and neural network models (AUC 0.868). External validation revealed an AUC of 0.877 (95% CI: 0.864-0.889) for the adjusted random forest model. Pain severity was the most significant predictor, followed by the five-time sit-to-stand test (FTSST) and sleep problems. This study is the first in China to apply a predictive model for depressive symptoms in KOA patients, offering a practical tool for early risk identification using routinely available data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发用于预测膝关节骨关节炎患者抑郁症状的机器学习模型。
膝关节骨性关节炎(KOA)合并抑郁症状是一种普遍现象,会导致不良后果和巨大的经济负担。然而,用于识别高危患者的实用工具仍然有限。我们需要一个可靠的预测模型来填补这一空白。本研究旨在开发并验证一个预测模型,以识别有抑郁症状风险的 KOA 患者。模型开发使用了中国健康与退休纵向调查(CHARLS)数据,外部验证使用了骨关节炎倡议(OAI)数据。使用 LASSO 回归法选出了 18 个潜在预测因子。开发了 4 种机器学习模型--逻辑回归、决策树、随机森林和人工神经网络。使用工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、校准曲线和决策曲线分析评估模型性能。从外部验证的最优模型中提取了最重要的特征。共纳入了 469 个个体,其中 70% 用于训练,30% 用于测试。随机森林模型性能最佳,测试集的AUC为0.928,优于逻辑回归(AUC为0.622)、决策树(AUC为0.611)和神经网络模型(AUC为0.868)。外部验证显示,调整后的随机森林模型的AUC为0.877(95% CI:0.864-0.889)。疼痛严重程度是最重要的预测因素,其次是五次坐立测试(FTSST)和睡眠问题。该研究是国内首次应用KOA患者抑郁症状预测模型,为利用常规数据进行早期风险识别提供了实用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
期刊最新文献
HDBind: encoding of molecular structure with hyperdimensional binary representations. Potential biological application of silver nanoparticles synthesized from Citrus paradisi leaves. Application of novel nanomaterials with dual functions of antimicrobial and remineralization in mouthwashes. Application of state of health estimation and remaining useful life prediction for lithium-ion batteries based on AT-CNN-BiLSTM. Defect engineering in organic semiconductor based metal-dielectric photonic crystals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1