Politics, policy and action: lessons from rural GP advocacy in Ireland.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Rural and remote health Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-20 DOI:10.22605/RRH8700
Shagun Tuli, Peter Hayes, Patrick O'Donoghue, Fergus Glynn, Robert Scully, Andrew W Murphy, Alan Bruce Chater, Liam Glynn
{"title":"Politics, policy and action: lessons from rural GP advocacy in Ireland.","authors":"Shagun Tuli, Peter Hayes, Patrick O'Donoghue, Fergus Glynn, Robert Scully, Andrew W Murphy, Alan Bruce Chater, Liam Glynn","doi":"10.22605/RRH8700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Ireland has one of the most rural populations in Europe. Rurality presents challenges when accessing health services but should not be perceived as problematic and in need of a structural fix. Structural urbanism where health care is viewed as a commodity for individuals, rather than an infrastructure for populations, innately favours larger urban populations and has detrimental outcomes for rural health. In this article we present a brief account of advocacy led by rural GPs, their communities, and the political and policy implications of their efforts.</p><p><strong>Issues: </strong>In the period 2010-2016, Irish rural general practices were struggling for viability. Two key financial supports, distance coding and the Rural Practice Allowance, were withdrawn. This directly contributed to the founding of the 'No Doctor No Village' public campaign, following which the Rural Practice Allowance took shape as the Rural Support Practice Framework and was expanded to cover a larger number of rural practices. The World Rural Health Conference in June 2022 at the University of Limerick invited over 600 expert delegates who contributed to the authorship of the Limerick Declaration, a blueprint for advancing rural health in Ireland and internationally. This created a new momentum in advocacy for Irish rural general practice, which has drawn financial investments, sparked research interest building capacity for a pipeline to train rural general practitioners.</p><p><strong>Lessons learned: </strong>Local voices have driven monumental change in the Irish healthcare context. For these communities, the policy and politics of rural health are mere tools to maintaining or restoring their way of life. The biggest lesson to be learned is that unrelenting community commitment, when supported by the capacity to advocate, can influence politics and policy to generate sustainable outcomes and thriving communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"24 4","pages":"8700"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural and remote health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8700","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Ireland has one of the most rural populations in Europe. Rurality presents challenges when accessing health services but should not be perceived as problematic and in need of a structural fix. Structural urbanism where health care is viewed as a commodity for individuals, rather than an infrastructure for populations, innately favours larger urban populations and has detrimental outcomes for rural health. In this article we present a brief account of advocacy led by rural GPs, their communities, and the political and policy implications of their efforts.

Issues: In the period 2010-2016, Irish rural general practices were struggling for viability. Two key financial supports, distance coding and the Rural Practice Allowance, were withdrawn. This directly contributed to the founding of the 'No Doctor No Village' public campaign, following which the Rural Practice Allowance took shape as the Rural Support Practice Framework and was expanded to cover a larger number of rural practices. The World Rural Health Conference in June 2022 at the University of Limerick invited over 600 expert delegates who contributed to the authorship of the Limerick Declaration, a blueprint for advancing rural health in Ireland and internationally. This created a new momentum in advocacy for Irish rural general practice, which has drawn financial investments, sparked research interest building capacity for a pipeline to train rural general practitioners.

Lessons learned: Local voices have driven monumental change in the Irish healthcare context. For these communities, the policy and politics of rural health are mere tools to maintaining or restoring their way of life. The biggest lesson to be learned is that unrelenting community commitment, when supported by the capacity to advocate, can influence politics and policy to generate sustainable outcomes and thriving communities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治、政策和行动:爱尔兰农村全科医生宣传的经验教训。
背景:爱尔兰是欧洲农村人口最多的国家之一。农村人口在获取医疗服务方面面临挑战,但不应被视为存在问题和需要进行结构性修复。结构性城市主义将医疗保健视为个人的商品,而不是人口的基础设施,这种结构性城市主义天生有利于更多的城市人口,并对农村健康产生不利影响。在这篇文章中,我们简要介绍了由乡村全科医生及其社区领导的宣传活动,以及他们的努力所产生的政治和政策影响:2010-2016 年间,爱尔兰乡村全科医生一直在为生存而挣扎。远程编码和乡村诊所津贴这两项关键的财政支持被撤销。这直接促成了 "无医不成村 "公共运动的创立,之后,农村执业津贴形成了 "农村支持执业框架"(Rural Support Practice Framework),并扩大到覆盖更多的农村执业机构。2022 年 6 月在利默里克大学举行的世界农村卫生大会邀请了 600 多名专家代表参 加,他们为《利默里克宣言》的撰写做出了贡献,该宣言是推动爱尔兰和国际农村卫生 工作的蓝图。这为爱尔兰农村全科医生的宣传创造了新的动力,吸引了资金投入,激发了研究兴趣,为培训农村全科医生的管道建设提供了能力:经验教训:当地的声音推动了爱尔兰医疗保健领域的巨大变革。对这些社区而言,农村医疗的政策和政治只是维持或恢复其生活方式的工具。最大的教训是,社区的不懈承诺,在宣传能力的支持下,可以影响政治和政策,从而产生可持续的成果和繁荣的社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rural and remote health
Rural and remote health Rural Health-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rural and Remote Health is a not-for-profit, online-only, peer-reviewed academic publication. It aims to further rural and remote health education, research and practice. The primary purpose of the Journal is to publish and so provide an international knowledge-base of peer-reviewed material from rural health practitioners (medical, nursing and allied health professionals and health workers), educators, researchers and policy makers.
期刊最新文献
'Imagine if we had an actual service ...': a qualitative exploration of abortion access challenges in Australian rural primary care. The Murtupuni Statement on rural generalist professional practice in Australia. Therapeutic resources used by traditional communities of the Brazilian Amazon: a scoping review. First Nations Peoples' perspectives on telehealth physiotherapy: a qualitative study focused on the therapeutic relationship. Social determinants and socioeconomic inequalities in adherence to antenatal iron-folic acid supplementation in urban and rural Indonesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1