Prognostic Significance of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer after Radical Cystectomy.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.22037/uj.v21i.8266
Cem Yücel, Enes Dumanli, Mahmut Can Karabacak, Esat Kaan Akbay, Mehmet Yoldas, Uygar Micoogullari, Yusuf Ozlem Ilbey, Mehmet Zeynel Keskin
{"title":"Prognostic Significance of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer after Radical Cystectomy.","authors":"Cem Yücel, Enes Dumanli, Mahmut Can Karabacak, Esat Kaan Akbay, Mehmet Yoldas, Uygar Micoogullari, Yusuf Ozlem Ilbey, Mehmet Zeynel Keskin","doi":"10.22037/uj.v21i.8266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the impact of the The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, an indicator of nutritional status, on the survival and prognosis after radical cystectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The medical records of patients who underwent consecutive radical cystectomy operations with the diagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer at our clinic were retrospectively examined. The patients were separated into two groups based on the cut-off CONUT score which was derived using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The group with a CONUT score ≥ 3 was categorized as high CONUT, whereas the group with a CONUT score < 3 was categorized as low CONUT. The groups were compaired according to oncological outcomes and survival risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were statistically significantly lower in the High CONUT group compared to the Low CONUT group (p<0.001, p=0.024, respectively).  Age (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.006-1.04, p=0.011) and CONUT score (HR: 3.92, 95% CI: 2.66-5.77, p<0.001) were revealed to be independent prognostic variables in the multivariate analysis for OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CONUT score was found to be an independent predictor of survival in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":23416,"journal":{"name":"Urology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v21i.8266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the impact of the The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, an indicator of nutritional status, on the survival and prognosis after radical cystectomy.

Materials and methods: The medical records of patients who underwent consecutive radical cystectomy operations with the diagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer at our clinic were retrospectively examined. The patients were separated into two groups based on the cut-off CONUT score which was derived using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The group with a CONUT score ≥ 3 was categorized as high CONUT, whereas the group with a CONUT score < 3 was categorized as low CONUT. The groups were compaired according to oncological outcomes and survival risk factors.

Results: Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were statistically significantly lower in the High CONUT group compared to the Low CONUT group (p<0.001, p=0.024, respectively).  Age (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.006-1.04, p=0.011) and CONUT score (HR: 3.92, 95% CI: 2.66-5.77, p<0.001) were revealed to be independent prognostic variables in the multivariate analysis for OS.

Conclusion: The CONUT score was found to be an independent predictor of survival in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer in this study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根治性膀胱切除术后肌浸润性膀胱癌患者营养状况控制(CONUT)评分的预后意义
目的:评估营养状况指标--营养状况控制评分(CONUT)对根治性膀胱切除术后生存率和预后的影响:回顾性研究在本诊所接受根治性膀胱切除术并确诊为肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者的病历。根据接受者操作特征曲线(ROC)得出的临界 CONUT 评分,将患者分为两组。CONUT评分≥3分的一组被归类为高CONUT,而CONUT评分≥3分的一组则被归类为低CONUT:与低CONUT组相比,高CONUT组的癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率(OS)在统计学上明显较低(p结论:本研究发现,CONUT 评分是肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者生存率的独立预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Journal
Urology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Urology and Nephrology Research Center (UNRC) and the Iranian Urological Association (IUA), Urology Journal is a comprehensive digest of useful information on modern urology. Emphasis is on practical information that reflects the latest diagnostic and treatment techniques. Our objectives are to provide an exceptional source of current and clinically relevant research in the discipline of urology, to reflect the scientific work and progress of our colleagues, and to present the articles in a logical, timely, and concise format that meets the diverse needs of today’s urologist. Urology Journal publishes manuscripts on urology and kidney transplantation, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. Accordingly, original articles, case reports, and letters to editor are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Knowledge of ChatGPT in Answering Questions Regarding Female Urology. The Comparative Study on the Application Value of Transperineal Prostate Combined Biopsy and Transrectal Prostate Systematic Biopsy in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer in Patients with Different PSA Zones. Sexual Functions in Men with Congenital Bilateral Absence of the Vas Deferens: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study with Fertile Men. Prognostic Significance of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer after Radical Cystectomy. Minimalist Approach for HoLEP with A Low-Power Holmium Source: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1