A Preliminary Study of Post-Market Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration (BEAR) Suggests Non-Inferior Short-Term Outcomes and Low Complications.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Hss Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1177/15563316241265351
Aakash K Shah, Morgan E Rizy, Ava G Neijna, Tyler J Uppstrom, Andreas H Gomoll, Sabrina M Strickland
{"title":"A Preliminary Study of Post-Market Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration (BEAR) Suggests Non-Inferior Short-Term Outcomes and Low Complications.","authors":"Aakash K Shah, Morgan E Rizy, Ava G Neijna, Tyler J Uppstrom, Andreas H Gomoll, Sabrina M Strickland","doi":"10.1177/15563316241265351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To improve outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, bridge-enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR) was introduced. Bridge-enhanced ACL restoration uses a collagen-based implant saturated with infused autologous blood to bridge the torn proximal and distal ACL fibers.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We sought to analyze the short-term complications, clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing BEAR outside of the initial clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all skeletally mature patients who had a midsubstance or proximal ACL tear treated with BEAR by 2 surgeons at a single institution and had a minimum follow-up of 6 weeks. A total of 58 patients were included (average age was 38 years, average time from injury to surgery was 45 days). Data on demographic factors, functional outcomes, and complications were collected from electronic medical records. Patient-reported outcome measures and a descriptive return-to-activity survey were analyzed utilizing paired <i>t</i>-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 58 patients demonstrated a grade of 1A on the Lachman test at 6 weeks postoperatively. At 6 months postoperatively, the mean active flexion was 135° ± 5°, and all patients achieved 0° extension. Although not all patients completed PROM questionnaires, among those who did we observed a significant increase in PROMs between preoperative and postoperative measurements; more than half achieved the minimal clinically important difference in all PROMs, and 26 patients (87%) had a 1-level decrease in function. There were no cases of retear or instability. Three patients (5%) had postoperative arthrofibrosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early results of this preliminary post-market approval study suggest that BEAR may provide a safe and non-inferior approach to ACL reconstruction in selected patients. Studies are needed to investigate the long-term outcomes of this novel technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":35357,"journal":{"name":"Hss Journal","volume":" ","pages":"15563316241265351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hss Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316241265351","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To improve outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, bridge-enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR) was introduced. Bridge-enhanced ACL restoration uses a collagen-based implant saturated with infused autologous blood to bridge the torn proximal and distal ACL fibers.

Purpose: We sought to analyze the short-term complications, clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing BEAR outside of the initial clinical trials.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all skeletally mature patients who had a midsubstance or proximal ACL tear treated with BEAR by 2 surgeons at a single institution and had a minimum follow-up of 6 weeks. A total of 58 patients were included (average age was 38 years, average time from injury to surgery was 45 days). Data on demographic factors, functional outcomes, and complications were collected from electronic medical records. Patient-reported outcome measures and a descriptive return-to-activity survey were analyzed utilizing paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

Results: All 58 patients demonstrated a grade of 1A on the Lachman test at 6 weeks postoperatively. At 6 months postoperatively, the mean active flexion was 135° ± 5°, and all patients achieved 0° extension. Although not all patients completed PROM questionnaires, among those who did we observed a significant increase in PROMs between preoperative and postoperative measurements; more than half achieved the minimal clinically important difference in all PROMs, and 26 patients (87%) had a 1-level decrease in function. There were no cases of retear or instability. Three patients (5%) had postoperative arthrofibrosis.

Conclusion: Early results of this preliminary post-market approval study suggest that BEAR may provide a safe and non-inferior approach to ACL reconstruction in selected patients. Studies are needed to investigate the long-term outcomes of this novel technique.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
桥接增强前交叉韧带修复术(BEAR)上市后的初步研究表明,其短期疗效并不差,并发症较少。
背景:为了改善前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术后的疗效,桥式增强前交叉韧带修复术(BEAR)应运而生。目的:我们试图在最初的临床试验之外,分析接受 BEAR 手术的患者的短期并发症、临床疗效和患者报告的疗效指标(PROMs):我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是在一家医疗机构接受 BEAR 治疗的所有骨骼发育成熟的前交叉韧带中段或近端撕裂患者,这些患者均由两名外科医生进行了至少 6 周的随访。共纳入了 58 名患者(平均年龄为 38 岁,从受伤到手术的平均时间为 45 天)。有关人口统计学因素、功能结果和并发症的数据均来自电子病历。利用配对t检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验对患者报告的结果指标和描述性恢复活动调查进行了分析:结果:所有 58 名患者在术后 6 周的拉赫曼测试中都达到了 1A 级。术后 6 个月时,平均主动屈曲度为 135° ± 5°,所有患者的伸展度均为 0°。虽然并非所有患者都填写了 PROM 问卷,但在填写问卷的患者中,我们观察到术前和术后测量的 PROMs 显著增加;一半以上的患者在所有 PROMs 中都达到了最小临床意义差异,26 名患者(87%)的功能下降了 1 级。没有再撕裂或不稳定的病例。三名患者(5%)出现术后关节纤维化:这项上市后初步研究的早期结果表明,BEAR可为特定患者提供一种安全、非劣质的前交叉韧带重建方法。需要对这种新型技术的长期效果进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hss Journal
Hss Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The HSS Journal is the Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery. The aim of the HSS Journal is to promote cutting edge research, clinical pathways, and state-of-the-art techniques that inform and facilitate the continuing education of the orthopaedic and musculoskeletal communities. HSS Journal publishes articles that offer contributions to the advancement of the knowledge of musculoskeletal diseases and encourages submission of manuscripts from all musculoskeletal disciplines.
期刊最新文献
A Commitment to Quality in Musculoskeletal Research Reporting. Guillain-Barré Syndrome Following Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Case Report Highlighting Early Magnetic Resonance Neurography Findings. Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of First Tarsometatarsal Joint Arthrodesis With a Biplanar Locking Plate System Versus the Modified Lapidus Technique With Crossed-Screw Fixation: A Retrospective Multicenter Comparison. Hospital Network Centralization of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Is Associated With Reduced Early Complication Rates But Not Reduced Readmission or Reoperation Rates: A Retrospective Database Study. Ultrasound as a Complementary Tool to Electrodiagnostics in the Evaluation of Compressive Neuropathy of the Common Fibular Nerve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1