Hss Journal最新文献

Background: Correct localization and characterization of nerve abnormality is of critical importance to appropriate intervention. Ultrasound (US) is known to be accurate in the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy and in preoperative localization of nerve abnormalities and skin marking.

Purpose: We sought to investigate the utility of US-guided preoperative skin marking for the localization of peripheral nerve abnormality and to compare the US findings to electrodiagnostic (EDx) reports.

Methods: Using the radiology information system at a single institution, we identified US examinations performed for preoperative localization of peripheral nerve abnormality from July 2016 to March 2023. Data collected included US characterization, surgical description, and EDx report of neuropathy.

Results: Search parameters identified 67 nerves in 55 patients treated surgically after US-guided localization of the nerve with skin marking. The EDx characterization was performed in 36 (54%) of these cases. The US diagnoses included neuroma, transection, perineural scarring, hardware impingement, and intraneural fascicular constriction. There was 100% accuracy of US findings as confirmed by operative notes. Skin marking by US guidance correlated to the sites of the nerve documented in operative reports of all 67 cases.

Conclusion: In this single-institution retrospective review, US-guided preoperative skin marking of nerve abnormality was used to correctly localize peripheral nerve abnormality, and US diagnoses were corroborated by intraoperative findings. Further higher-level study is needed to support these findings suggesting the efficacy of US in mapping the course of peripheral nerves.

Background: Essential amino acid (EAA) supplementation, including conditionally essential amino acid (CEAA) and branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) supplementation, has been suggested as a mechanism to optimize patient outcomes by counteracting the atrophy associated with orthopedic procedures. Purpose: We sought to investigate the effect of EAA supplementation in the perioperative period on patients undergoing orthopedic and spine surgery, specifically whether it is associated with (1) reductions in postoperative muscle atrophy and (2) improved postoperative function including range of motion, strength, and mobility. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used, and the protocol was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42023447774). Studies of interest were prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between 2002 and 2023 evaluating the impact of EAA supplementation on patients undergoing orthopedic and spine surgery. Results: Ten RCTs evaluating EAA supplementation in trauma, adult reconstruction, and spine surgery were identified; half of these focused on adult reconstruction. The EAA supplementation dose (3.4-20 g), frequency (daily to 3 times per day), and duration (14-49 days) varied widely across studies. Seven studies reported parameters relating to muscle size and/or composition, with 3 studies reporting superior muscle size/composition in patients receiving perioperative EAA supplementation, when compared with controls. Three studies reported favorable mobility outcomes for patients receiving EAA. Meta-analysis was prohibited by variation in measurement and outcome variables across the studies. Conclusions: Pooled data from level I studies supports the use of EAA, BCAA, and CEAA supplementations across several orthopedic subspecialties. However, significant heterogeneity exists in the quantity, duration, and content of EAA administered. Further prospective studies are needed to determine optimal/standardized parameters for supplementation.

Background: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are developed to synthesize evidence into recommendations for clinical practice. Minimal evidence exists on the evaluation practice of physical therapists in the treatment of patients with neck pain. Purpose: We sought to describe (1) the extent to which clinicians perform the Neck Pain CPG-recommended examination measures and (2) the percentage of patients properly classified. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the electronic health records of 397 patients with neck pain at an ambulatory care setting in an academic medical center. The frequency of physical therapists' evaluation measures, subjective findings, positive examination results, and the percentage of patients properly classified into impairment-based categories (IBCs) were recorded. Descriptive statistics and χ² tests were used to assess patient demographics and compare classification accuracy across IBCs. Results: Of the 397 patients, 56% were classified into an IBC. The most common IBC was neck pain with mobility deficits (24%), followed by neck pain with radiating pain (17%), neck pain with movement coordination impairments (NPMCIs) (8%), and neck pain with headache (6%). Neck pain with movement coordination impairment had the lowest percentage of proper classifications. Classification accuracy was highest when subjective and objective findings were combined and varied between IBCs. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that physical therapists evaluating patients with neck pain may have increased classification accuracy when subjective and objective findings are considered. Decreased classification accuracy was demonstrated in the NPMCI category, highlighting opportunities for further education and research.

Background: Restoring leg length during total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fracture is challenging due to the lack of an intact femoral neck on the fractured side. Thus, templating methods typically use size of the intact contralateral hip to estimate length. Common reference points include the distance from the lesser trochanter to the center of the femoral head (LTC) and femoral head diameter (FHD). Objectives: We sought to (1) investigate the LTC:FHD ratio as a preoperative templating method and (2) compare this method with calibrated LTC measurements. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing primary THA between 2021 and 2022 with recorded intraoperative measurements of LTC and FHD at a single academic orthopedic specialty hospital. Preoperative hip X-rays were used to determine the "predicted LTC length" with 2 separate methods: the LTC:FHD ratio yielding the "Ratio Predicted LTC" and the calibrated measurements method yielding the "Calibrated Predicted LTC." These measurements were compared with intraoperative measurements of the LTC length to determine accuracy. Results: Sixty-two hips in 59 patients were studied. The ratio predicted LTC and contralateral ratio predicted LTC length showed no significant difference from the intraoperative LTC length with a strong correlation between the 2 measurements (correlation coefficient = 0.77 and 0.80). The calibrated predicted LTC lengths were significantly different from the intraoperative LTC lengths (mean difference, 3.0 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [2.2, 3.8]). Conclusions: This retrospective review suggests the LTC:FHD ratio multiplied by intraoperative FHD may be an accurate method for restoring anatomic femoral head height in THA (LTC_a = [LTC_r/FHD_r] × FHD_a). This method may be useful in hip fracture populations with distorted proximal femoral anatomy.

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) printer technology has seen a surge in use in medicine, particularly in orthopedics. A recent area of research is its use in peripheral nerve repair, which often requires a graft or conduit to bridge segmental defects. Currently, nerve gaps are bridged using autografts, allografts, or synthetic conduits. Purpose: We sought to improve upon the current design of simple hollow, cylindrical conduits that often result in poor nerve regeneration. Previous attempts were made at reducing axonal dispersion with the use of multichanneled conduits. To our knowledge, none has attempted to mimic and test the anatomical topography of the nerve. Methods: Using serial histology sections, 3D reconstruction software, and computer-aided design, a scaffold was created based on the fascicular topography of a rat sciatic nerve. A 3D printer produced both cylindrical conduits and topography-based scaffolds. These were implanted in 12 Lewis rats: 6 rats with the topographical scaffold and 6 rats with the cylindrical conduit. Each rodent's uninjured contralateral limb was used as a control for comparison of functional and histologic outcomes. Walking track analysis was performed, and the Sciatic Functional Index (SFI) was calculated with the Image J software. After 6 weeks, rats were sacrificed and analyses performed on the regenerated nerve tissue. Primary outcomes measured included nerve (fiber) density, nerve fiber width, total number of nerve fibers, G-ratio (ratio of axon width to total fiber width), and percent debris. Secondary outcomes measured included electrophysiology studies of electromyography (EMG) latency and EMG amplitude and isometric force output by the gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior. Results: There were no differences observed between the cylindrical conduit and topographical scaffold in terms of histological outcomes, muscle force, EMG, or SFI. Conclusion: This study of regeneration of the sciatic nerve in a rat model suggests the feasibility of 3D-printed topographical scaffolds. More research is required to quantify the functional outcomes of this technology for peripheral nerve regeneration.