Nurdan Paker, Büşra Şirin Ahısha, Nur Kesiktaş, Nazlı Derya Buğdaycı, Yelda Soluk Özdemir
{"title":"Construct validity and reliability of the 2-minute step test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.","authors":"Nurdan Paker, Büşra Şirin Ahısha, Nur Kesiktaş, Nazlı Derya Buğdaycı, Yelda Soluk Özdemir","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2428824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the 2-Minute Step Test (2MST) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This cross-sectional study involved 55 volunteers, aged 18-80, diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis. The participants were assessed using the 2MST, the 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). To evaluate the reliability of the 2MST, test-retest reliability was determined by administering the 2MST again after a 7-day interval. The reliability analysis included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC<sub>95</sub>). For concurrent validity, the correlations of the 2MST with the 2MWT, 6MWT, and ODI were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2MST exhibited excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.94, SEM = 5.56, MDC<sub>95</sub>=15.41) in LSS patients. Additionally, the 2MST showed significant correlations with the 2MWT (<i>r</i> = 0.842, <i>p</i> < 0.001), 6MWT (<i>r</i> = 0.819, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and ODI score (<i>r</i> = -0.722, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the 2MST is a valid and reliable tool for assessing exercise capacity in individuals with LSS.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials.gov id: </strong>NCT06060821.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2428824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the 2-Minute Step Test (2MST) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
Method: This cross-sectional study involved 55 volunteers, aged 18-80, diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis. The participants were assessed using the 2MST, the 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). To evaluate the reliability of the 2MST, test-retest reliability was determined by administering the 2MST again after a 7-day interval. The reliability analysis included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC95). For concurrent validity, the correlations of the 2MST with the 2MWT, 6MWT, and ODI were assessed.
Results: The 2MST exhibited excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.94, SEM = 5.56, MDC95=15.41) in LSS patients. Additionally, the 2MST showed significant correlations with the 2MWT (r = 0.842, p < 0.001), 6MWT (r = 0.819, p < 0.001), and ODI score (r = -0.722, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the 2MST is a valid and reliable tool for assessing exercise capacity in individuals with LSS.
期刊介绍:
Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.