Construct validity and reliability of the 2-minute step test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2428824
Nurdan Paker, Büşra Şirin Ahısha, Nur Kesiktaş, Nazlı Derya Buğdaycı, Yelda Soluk Özdemir
{"title":"Construct validity and reliability of the 2-minute step test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.","authors":"Nurdan Paker, Büşra Şirin Ahısha, Nur Kesiktaş, Nazlı Derya Buğdaycı, Yelda Soluk Özdemir","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2428824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the 2-Minute Step Test (2MST) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This cross-sectional study involved 55 volunteers, aged 18-80, diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis. The participants were assessed using the 2MST, the 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). To evaluate the reliability of the 2MST, test-retest reliability was determined by administering the 2MST again after a 7-day interval. The reliability analysis included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC<sub>95</sub>). For concurrent validity, the correlations of the 2MST with the 2MWT, 6MWT, and ODI were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2MST exhibited excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.94, SEM = 5.56, MDC<sub>95</sub>=15.41) in LSS patients. Additionally, the 2MST showed significant correlations with the 2MWT (<i>r</i> = 0.842, <i>p</i> < 0.001), 6MWT (<i>r</i> = 0.819, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and ODI score (<i>r</i> = -0.722, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the 2MST is a valid and reliable tool for assessing exercise capacity in individuals with LSS.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials.gov id: </strong>NCT06060821.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"3708-3713"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2428824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the 2-Minute Step Test (2MST) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

Method: This cross-sectional study involved 55 volunteers, aged 18-80, diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis. The participants were assessed using the 2MST, the 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). To evaluate the reliability of the 2MST, test-retest reliability was determined by administering the 2MST again after a 7-day interval. The reliability analysis included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC95). For concurrent validity, the correlations of the 2MST with the 2MWT, 6MWT, and ODI were assessed.

Results: The 2MST exhibited excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.94, SEM = 5.56, MDC95=15.41) in LSS patients. Additionally, the 2MST showed significant correlations with the 2MWT (r = 0.842, p < 0.001), 6MWT (r = 0.819, p < 0.001), and ODI score (r = -0.722, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the 2MST is a valid and reliable tool for assessing exercise capacity in individuals with LSS.

Clinicaltrials.gov id: NCT06060821.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰椎管狭窄症患者 2 分钟台阶测试的结构有效性和可靠性。
目的:本研究旨在探讨腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者进行 2 分钟台阶测试(2MST)的有效性和可靠性:这项横断面研究涉及 55 名被诊断患有腰椎管狭窄症、年龄在 18-80 岁之间的志愿者。研究人员使用 2MST、2 分钟步行测试(2MWT)、6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和 Oswestry 失能指数(ODI)对参与者进行了评估。为了评估 2MST 的可靠性,在间隔 7 天后再次进行 2MST 测试,以确定测试-再测可靠性。可靠性分析包括带有 95% 置信区间 (CI) 的类内相关系数 (ICC)、测量标准误差 (SEM) 和 95% 置信度下的最小可检测变化 (MDC95)。在并发有效性方面,评估了 2MST 与 2MWT、6MWT 和 ODI 的相关性:2MST 在 LSS 患者中表现出极佳的测试-再测可靠性(ICC=0.94,SEM=5.56,MDC95=15.41)。此外,2MST 与 2MWT 显示出显著的相关性(r = 0.842,p r = 0.819,p r = -0.722,p 结论:该研究表明,2MST 与 2MWT 之间存在显著的相关性:本研究表明,2MST 是评估 LSS 患者运动能力的有效而可靠的工具:NCT06060821。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
A biomechanical analysis of the effectiveness of the Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) for chronic stroke rehabilitation. My MAPS: incorporating personal and social factors to increase physical activity after stroke: a co-design study. Existing evidence of self-management interventions in acquired brain injuries and traumatic injuries: a scoping review. A timed sit-to-stand test and prediction equation had poor agreement with a graded exercise test in people with stroke. Body weight supported gait training on walking, quality of life and harm in adults with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1