Construct validity and reliability of the 2-minute step test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2428824
Nurdan Paker, Büşra Şirin Ahısha, Nur Kesiktaş, Nazlı Derya Buğdaycı, Yelda Soluk Özdemir
{"title":"Construct validity and reliability of the 2-minute step test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.","authors":"Nurdan Paker, Büşra Şirin Ahısha, Nur Kesiktaş, Nazlı Derya Buğdaycı, Yelda Soluk Özdemir","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2428824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the 2-Minute Step Test (2MST) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This cross-sectional study involved 55 volunteers, aged 18-80, diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis. The participants were assessed using the 2MST, the 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). To evaluate the reliability of the 2MST, test-retest reliability was determined by administering the 2MST again after a 7-day interval. The reliability analysis included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC<sub>95</sub>). For concurrent validity, the correlations of the 2MST with the 2MWT, 6MWT, and ODI were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2MST exhibited excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.94, SEM = 5.56, MDC<sub>95</sub>=15.41) in LSS patients. Additionally, the 2MST showed significant correlations with the 2MWT (<i>r</i> = 0.842, <i>p</i> < 0.001), 6MWT (<i>r</i> = 0.819, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and ODI score (<i>r</i> = -0.722, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the 2MST is a valid and reliable tool for assessing exercise capacity in individuals with LSS.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials.gov id: </strong>NCT06060821.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2428824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the 2-Minute Step Test (2MST) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

Method: This cross-sectional study involved 55 volunteers, aged 18-80, diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis. The participants were assessed using the 2MST, the 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). To evaluate the reliability of the 2MST, test-retest reliability was determined by administering the 2MST again after a 7-day interval. The reliability analysis included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC95). For concurrent validity, the correlations of the 2MST with the 2MWT, 6MWT, and ODI were assessed.

Results: The 2MST exhibited excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.94, SEM = 5.56, MDC95=15.41) in LSS patients. Additionally, the 2MST showed significant correlations with the 2MWT (r = 0.842, p < 0.001), 6MWT (r = 0.819, p < 0.001), and ODI score (r = -0.722, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the 2MST is a valid and reliable tool for assessing exercise capacity in individuals with LSS.

Clinicaltrials.gov id: NCT06060821.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰椎管狭窄症患者 2 分钟台阶测试的结构有效性和可靠性。
目的:本研究旨在探讨腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者进行 2 分钟台阶测试(2MST)的有效性和可靠性:这项横断面研究涉及 55 名被诊断患有腰椎管狭窄症、年龄在 18-80 岁之间的志愿者。研究人员使用 2MST、2 分钟步行测试(2MWT)、6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和 Oswestry 失能指数(ODI)对参与者进行了评估。为了评估 2MST 的可靠性,在间隔 7 天后再次进行 2MST 测试,以确定测试-再测可靠性。可靠性分析包括带有 95% 置信区间 (CI) 的类内相关系数 (ICC)、测量标准误差 (SEM) 和 95% 置信度下的最小可检测变化 (MDC95)。在并发有效性方面,评估了 2MST 与 2MWT、6MWT 和 ODI 的相关性:2MST 在 LSS 患者中表现出极佳的测试-再测可靠性(ICC=0.94,SEM=5.56,MDC95=15.41)。此外,2MST 与 2MWT 显示出显著的相关性(r = 0.842,p r = 0.819,p r = -0.722,p 结论:该研究表明,2MST 与 2MWT 之间存在显著的相关性:本研究表明,2MST 是评估 LSS 患者运动能力的有效而可靠的工具:NCT06060821。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
"More than effort, it's dedicating time and perseverance." experiences of physical activity and physical exercise in stroke survivor with high functional capacity: a qualitative study. Development and validation of an observational tool to measure engagement in telepractice early intervention. Exploring perspectives on implementing the World Health Assembly's Resolution for Strengthening Rehabilitation in Health Systems in Switzerland: a representative rehabilitation stakeholder survey. The Albanian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability. Understanding loneliness and its correlates among people with spinal cord injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1