Effect of rescue work training in nursing students with a novel device: A quasi-experimental study

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING International Emergency Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101544
Verónica V. Márquez Hernández , José Miguel Garrido-Molina , Antonio Javier Segura-Fornieles , Mª Carmen Rodríguez-García , Alba García-Viola
{"title":"Effect of rescue work training in nursing students with a novel device: A quasi-experimental study","authors":"Verónica V. Márquez Hernández ,&nbsp;José Miguel Garrido-Molina ,&nbsp;Antonio Javier Segura-Fornieles ,&nbsp;Mª Carmen Rodríguez-García ,&nbsp;Alba García-Viola","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of an intervention for the training of nursing students in rescue work of a traumatized patient using the Snaid® device.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A quasi-experimental one group pretest–posttest study was carried out. A total of 107 nursing students participated. Data on self-efficacy, knowledge, ergonomics and skill were collected. The data were analyzed with SPSS version 29 statistical software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Statistically significant differences were found between mean self-efficacy score and time of measurement (U = 2090.500; Z = -8.377; p &lt; 0.001). Statistically significant differences were also found between the time of measurement and the knowledge score (U = 373.000; Z = -11.966; p &lt; 0.001). Considering the results on ergonomics, it was found that the mean score given after the intervention was 9.37 (SD = 1.02). Regarding intervention time, the mean time was 47.76 s (SD = 4.74). Finally, considering skill, the mean score was 8.78 (SD = 1.23).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results of the present study indicate that participants obtained a high level of self-efficacy, knowledge, skill and ergonomics after training in the rescue work of a patient through the Snaid® device. This device may contribute to improve trauma patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 101544"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X24001393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of an intervention for the training of nursing students in rescue work of a traumatized patient using the Snaid® device.

Methods

A quasi-experimental one group pretest–posttest study was carried out. A total of 107 nursing students participated. Data on self-efficacy, knowledge, ergonomics and skill were collected. The data were analyzed with SPSS version 29 statistical software.

Results

Statistically significant differences were found between mean self-efficacy score and time of measurement (U = 2090.500; Z = -8.377; p < 0.001). Statistically significant differences were also found between the time of measurement and the knowledge score (U = 373.000; Z = -11.966; p < 0.001). Considering the results on ergonomics, it was found that the mean score given after the intervention was 9.37 (SD = 1.02). Regarding intervention time, the mean time was 47.76 s (SD = 4.74). Finally, considering skill, the mean score was 8.78 (SD = 1.23).

Conclusion

The results of the present study indicate that participants obtained a high level of self-efficacy, knowledge, skill and ergonomics after training in the rescue work of a patient through the Snaid® device. This device may contribute to improve trauma patient care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用新型设备对护理专业学生进行抢救工作培训的效果:准实验研究。
目的:本研究旨在分析使用 Snaid® 设备对护理专业学生进行创伤患者抢救工作培训的干预效果:方法:开展了一项前测-后测一组的准实验研究。共有 107 名护理专业学生参加。研究收集了有关自我效能感、知识、人体工程学和技能的数据。数据采用 SPSS 29 版统计软件进行分析:本研究的结果表明,在通过 Snaid® 设备对患者进行抢救工作培训后,参与者获得了较高的自我效能感、知识、技能和人体工程学水平。该设备可能有助于改善创伤患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care. The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Urgent care in Australia: Unblocking nurse practitioner capacity to address systemic access issues Leadership in emergency medical services: An integrative literature review Team collaboration and caring ability as reciprocal predictors of missed nursing care: A cross-sectional study among emergency nurses in China Emergency Nurses’ Comprehensive process of surrogate decision Support: Reanalysis of qualitative data Using a grounded theory Comparative effectiveness of the Buzzy®, ShotBlocker® and Helfer skin tap technique in reducing pain and fear during pediatric intramuscular injections: A randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1