Attitudes towards geroprotection: measuring willingness, from lifestyle changes to drug use.

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Frontiers in aging Pub Date : 2024-11-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fragi.2024.1440661
Sam J Brouwers, Georges E Janssens, Tali Spiegel
{"title":"Attitudes towards geroprotection: measuring willingness, from lifestyle changes to drug use.","authors":"Sam J Brouwers, Georges E Janssens, Tali Spiegel","doi":"10.3389/fragi.2024.1440661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Geroprotection is an emerging field of research focused on devising strategies for combating the mechanisms of ageing. This study held three aims: 1) to explore the willingness to utilise five different geroprotective measures (i.e., exercise, supplements, intermittent fasting, metformin, and rapamycin use), 2) to explore whether the willingness differs based on respondents' sociodemographic characteristics and 3) to explore the association between trust in medical institutions and willingness to utilise different geroprotective measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was used to assess the attitudes of a sample of the Dutch population by way of both convenience and snowball sampling (final N = 178). Descriptive data and bivariate correlations were used in the analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relatively high social acceptance of both exercise (66%) and supplements (82%) was found, whereas intermittent fasting (30%), metformin (26%), and rapamycin (10%) were less supported. Males were significantly more likely to be open to exercise and women to supplement use. Trust in medical institutions correlated significantly with the willingness to start metformin.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Exploratory research can only provide a first step in understanding the social acceptance of geroprotection measures. Nevertheless, this study clearly illustrates more well-known measures promoted by public health policy are also more accepted and used. Public health campaigns could consider the sex differences in the uptake of exercise and supplements, and future research may want to delve deeper into the role of facilitating trust relations between medical institutions and the public in promoting the use of geroprotective drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73061,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in aging","volume":"5 ","pages":"1440661"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2024.1440661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Geroprotection is an emerging field of research focused on devising strategies for combating the mechanisms of ageing. This study held three aims: 1) to explore the willingness to utilise five different geroprotective measures (i.e., exercise, supplements, intermittent fasting, metformin, and rapamycin use), 2) to explore whether the willingness differs based on respondents' sociodemographic characteristics and 3) to explore the association between trust in medical institutions and willingness to utilise different geroprotective measures.

Methods: A questionnaire was used to assess the attitudes of a sample of the Dutch population by way of both convenience and snowball sampling (final N = 178). Descriptive data and bivariate correlations were used in the analyses.

Results: Relatively high social acceptance of both exercise (66%) and supplements (82%) was found, whereas intermittent fasting (30%), metformin (26%), and rapamycin (10%) were less supported. Males were significantly more likely to be open to exercise and women to supplement use. Trust in medical institutions correlated significantly with the willingness to start metformin.

Discussion: Exploratory research can only provide a first step in understanding the social acceptance of geroprotection measures. Nevertheless, this study clearly illustrates more well-known measures promoted by public health policy are also more accepted and used. Public health campaigns could consider the sex differences in the uptake of exercise and supplements, and future research may want to delve deeper into the role of facilitating trust relations between medical institutions and the public in promoting the use of geroprotective drugs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对老年保护的态度:从改变生活方式到使用药物,衡量意愿。
引言老年保护是一个新兴的研究领域,其重点是制定对抗老化机制的策略。本研究有三个目的1)探讨使用五种不同的老年保护措施(即运动、补充剂、间歇性禁食、二甲双胍和雷帕霉素)的意愿;2)探讨受访者的社会人口学特征是否导致其意愿有所不同;3)探讨对医疗机构的信任与使用不同老年保护措施的意愿之间的关联:方法:通过方便抽样和滚雪球抽样(最终样本数 = 178),对荷兰人口的态度进行了问卷调查。分析中使用了描述性数据和双变量相关性:结果发现,社会对运动(66%)和营养补充剂(82%)的接受度相对较高,而对间歇性禁食(30%)、二甲双胍(26%)和雷帕霉素(10%)的支持度较低。男性更倾向于运动,女性更倾向于使用补充剂。对医疗机构的信任与开始服用二甲双胍的意愿密切相关:探索性研究只能为了解老年保护措施的社会接受度提供第一步。尽管如此,本研究清楚地表明,公共卫生政策所提倡的更广为人知的措施也更容易被接受和使用。公共卫生运动可以考虑在接受运动和补充剂方面的性别差异,未来的研究可能希望更深入地探讨促进医疗机构和公众之间的信任关系在推广使用老年保护药物方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Relationship between albumin-corrected anion gap and lumbar spine bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study. Effects of group music sessions on cognitive and psychological functions in healthy older adults. Editorial: Pathogen-induced immunosenescence: where do vaccines stand? Investigating shared risk variants and genetic etiology between Alzheimer's disease and three stress-related psychiatric disorders: a large-scale genome-wide cross-trait analysis. Immunogenetics of longevity and its association with human endogenous retrovirus K.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1