Resilience throughout and beyond COVID-19: a longitudinal analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Psychology Health & Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1080/13548506.2024.2424996
Roselyn Thom, John R Best, Anna MacLellan, Zainab Naqqash, Boyee Lin, Cynthia Lu, Hasina Samji, S Evelyn Stewart
{"title":"Resilience throughout and beyond COVID-19: a longitudinal analysis.","authors":"Roselyn Thom, John R Best, Anna MacLellan, Zainab Naqqash, Boyee Lin, Cynthia Lu, Hasina Samji, S Evelyn Stewart","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2024.2424996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Defined as the ability to adapt to adversity with a positive and stable mindset, resilience should be an important factor in coping with long-term evolving setbacks such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the negative mental health impacts of the pandemic are well-documented, the course of resilience during the pandemic and recovery periods remains understudied. This study examined resilience trajectories among respondents in the Canadian Personal Impacts of COVID-19 Survey (PICS) who provided data for at least two timepoints (<i>n</i> = 741). Resilience was measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), and linear mixed models assessed for variations in resilience over time. Sociodemographic factors were introduced as fixed-effects variables to ascertain impacts on baseline resilience scores and temporal trends. Overall, resilience levels were low throughout the course of the study. The study sample's median baseline resilience score was 26 (IQR 21-30), which is significantly lower than the 25<sup>th</sup> percentile CD-RISC score noted in a pre-pandemic American community survey. This remained relatively unchanged until month 20 of follow-up, when point resilience scores showed a subtle (under one point), yet significant uptick from baseline. Sociodemographic analysis showed that low income was consistently associated with lower resilience (1.8-point difference, SE = 0.5, <i>p</i> = 0.002) throughout the observational period. Participants with a psychiatric disorder history had lower baseline resilience compared to those without any psychiatric history (3.4-point difference, SE = .05, <i>p</i> < 0.001). This gap decreased to 2.0 points (SE = 0.6, <i>p</i> < 0.001) by 24 months post baseline, suggesting that this negative effect on resilience diminished over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1894-1906"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2024.2424996","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Defined as the ability to adapt to adversity with a positive and stable mindset, resilience should be an important factor in coping with long-term evolving setbacks such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the negative mental health impacts of the pandemic are well-documented, the course of resilience during the pandemic and recovery periods remains understudied. This study examined resilience trajectories among respondents in the Canadian Personal Impacts of COVID-19 Survey (PICS) who provided data for at least two timepoints (n = 741). Resilience was measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), and linear mixed models assessed for variations in resilience over time. Sociodemographic factors were introduced as fixed-effects variables to ascertain impacts on baseline resilience scores and temporal trends. Overall, resilience levels were low throughout the course of the study. The study sample's median baseline resilience score was 26 (IQR 21-30), which is significantly lower than the 25th percentile CD-RISC score noted in a pre-pandemic American community survey. This remained relatively unchanged until month 20 of follow-up, when point resilience scores showed a subtle (under one point), yet significant uptick from baseline. Sociodemographic analysis showed that low income was consistently associated with lower resilience (1.8-point difference, SE = 0.5, p = 0.002) throughout the observational period. Participants with a psychiatric disorder history had lower baseline resilience compared to those without any psychiatric history (3.4-point difference, SE = .05, p < 0.001). This gap decreased to 2.0 points (SE = 0.6, p < 0.001) by 24 months post baseline, suggesting that this negative effect on resilience diminished over time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 期间和之后的复原力:纵向分析。
抗逆力被定义为以积极稳定的心态适应逆境的能力,它应该是应对 COVID-19 大流行病等长期发展挫折的一个重要因素。尽管大流行病对心理健康造成的负面影响已得到充分证实,但人们对大流行病期间和恢复期的抗逆力过程仍然缺乏研究。本研究考察了加拿大 COVID-19 个人影响调查(PICS)中至少提供了两个时间点数据的受访者(n = 741)的恢复力轨迹。复原力采用康纳-戴维森复原力量表(CD-RISC)进行测量,线性混合模型评估复原力随时间的变化。社会人口因素作为固定效应变量被引入,以确定对基线复原力分数和时间趋势的影响。总体而言,在整个研究过程中,复原力水平较低。研究样本的基线复原力得分中位数为 26(IQR 21-30),明显低于大流行前美国社区调查中 CD-RISC 得分的第 25 百分位数。在随访的第 20 个月之前,这一分数一直保持相对不变,此时的复原力分数与基线分数相比出现了微弱(不到 1 分)但显著的上升。社会人口分析表明,在整个观察期间,低收入一直与较低的复原力相关(1.8 分的差异,SE = 0.5,p = 0.002)。与无精神病史的参与者相比,有精神病史的参与者的基线恢复力较低(3.4 分的差异,SE = 0.05,P = 0.002)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology Health & Medicine
Psychology Health & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management. For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between insight and coping attitudes in bipolar disorder patients. The association between perceived neighborhood safety and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Cardiovascular comorbidities, mental health, and physical activity in persons with multiple sclerosis. The role of environmental sensitivity, traumatic experiences, defense mechanisms and mental pain on central sensitivity: testing a path analysis model in chronic headache on quality of life. Purpose, life satisfaction, and self-rated health in immigrant and non-immigrant adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1