Unshackled: Why Eliminating Health Disparities Requires that Our Criminal Justice System Set Incarcerated Mothers and Their Developing Children Free.

Journal of law and health Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Angela Dixon
{"title":"Unshackled: Why Eliminating Health Disparities Requires that Our Criminal Justice System Set Incarcerated Mothers and Their Developing Children Free.","authors":"Angela Dixon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Incarceration of pregnant nonviolent offenders takes not only the pregnant mother captive but also her unborn child. Kept in unnecessary captivity, these innocent children may experience adverse childhood experiences (\"ACES\") or lifelong damage to their physical and mental health. The experiences may be the same for children born already to the mother, as they endure the suffering of parental separation during the mother's absence. In terms of racial health disparities, such captivity presents at least a triple threat--harm to the health of the mother, harm to the health of the unborn fetus, and harm to the health of children born already to the mother. Using the story of Brittany Martin, a pregnant, nonviolent social justice protestor sentenced to four years in prison, this Article makes the case that ending racial health disparities requires offering alternatives other than imprisonment for nonviolent offenders who are pregnant. By offering alternatives that support and keep the parent-child relationship intact, and that avoid what may be lifelong negative consequences of imprisonment, these alternatives help break the cycle of poorer health that unfairly plagues marginalized populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":73804,"journal":{"name":"Journal of law and health","volume":"38 1","pages":"102-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of law and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Incarceration of pregnant nonviolent offenders takes not only the pregnant mother captive but also her unborn child. Kept in unnecessary captivity, these innocent children may experience adverse childhood experiences ("ACES") or lifelong damage to their physical and mental health. The experiences may be the same for children born already to the mother, as they endure the suffering of parental separation during the mother's absence. In terms of racial health disparities, such captivity presents at least a triple threat--harm to the health of the mother, harm to the health of the unborn fetus, and harm to the health of children born already to the mother. Using the story of Brittany Martin, a pregnant, nonviolent social justice protestor sentenced to four years in prison, this Article makes the case that ending racial health disparities requires offering alternatives other than imprisonment for nonviolent offenders who are pregnant. By offering alternatives that support and keep the parent-child relationship intact, and that avoid what may be lifelong negative consequences of imprisonment, these alternatives help break the cycle of poorer health that unfairly plagues marginalized populations.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解开枷锁:为什么消除健康差异需要我们的刑事司法系统释放被监禁的母亲及其正在发育的孩子?
监禁怀孕的非暴力罪犯不仅会囚禁怀孕的母亲,还会囚禁她未出生的孩子。在不必要的囚禁中,这些无辜的孩子可能会经历不利的童年经历("ACES"),或对其身心健康造成终生损害。母亲已经出生的孩子可能也会有同样的经历,因为他们要忍受母亲不在身边时父母分离的痛苦。就种族健康差异而言,这种囚禁至少带来了三重威胁--对母亲健康的伤害、对未出生胎儿健康的伤害以及对已出生儿童健康的伤害。布列塔尼-马丁(Brittany Martin)是一名怀孕的非暴力社会正义抗议者,被判入狱四年,本文通过她的故事说明,要消除种族健康差异,就必须为怀孕的非暴力犯罪者提供监禁之外的其他选择。通过提供支持和保持亲子关系完整的替代方案,避免监禁可能带来的终生负面影响,这些替代方案有助于打破不公平地困扰边缘化人群的健康状况较差的恶性循环。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Ninth Amendment: An Underutilized Protection for Reproductive Choice. Distorted Burden Shifting and Barred Mitigation: Being a Stubborn 234 Years Old Ironically Hasn't Helped the Supreme Court Mature. How Bodily Autonomy Can Fail Against Vaccination Mandates: The Few vs. the Many. When Governors Prioritize Individual Freedom over Public Health: Tort Liability for Government Failures. Without Due Process of Law: The Dobbs Decision and Its Cataclysmic Impact on the Substantive Due Process and Privacy Rights of Ohio Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1