Change in Governance Modes in Marine Protected Areas that Overlap with Fishing Territories: A Study of Cuba and Brazil

IF 0.9 4区历史学 Q2 AREA STUDIES Latin American Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1177/0094582x241262996

Manuela Dreyer da Silva, Cristina Frutuoso Teixeira, Raimundo Vento Tielves, Christian Luiz da Silva, Ania Bustio Ramos, Décio Estevão do Nascimento, Heather Heyes

{"title":"Change in Governance Modes in Marine Protected Areas that Overlap with Fishing Territories: A Study of Cuba and Brazil","authors":"Manuela Dreyer da Silva, Cristina Frutuoso Teixeira, Raimundo Vento Tielves, Christian Luiz da Silva, Ania Bustio Ramos, Décio Estevão do Nascimento, Heather Heyes","doi":"10.1177/0094582x241262996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses governance in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), particularly the possibility of formulating arrangements capable of confronting the effects of the ocean grabbing process in fishing territories. Through the articulation of experiences in MPAs in Cuba and Brazil and the content analysis of technical-scientific documents produced on the daily governance of these areas, legal frameworks in both countries, and peer-reviewed articles, this study identifies vectors of change in established modes of governance. The identified vectors are potential verifiers of equity and socio-environmental justice criteria in governance processes that can encourage recognition of traditional fisher’s rights to deliberation on access and use of resources in these areas. On the other hand, the conclusions drawn also reveal the limits of these arrangements when considering the ambiguity of the legal regimes that outline the creation and implementation of MPAs.","PeriodicalId":47390,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Perspectives","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582x241262996","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses governance in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), particularly the possibility of formulating arrangements capable of confronting the effects of the ocean grabbing process in fishing territories. Through the articulation of experiences in MPAs in Cuba and Brazil and the content analysis of technical-scientific documents produced on the daily governance of these areas, legal frameworks in both countries, and peer-reviewed articles, this study identifies vectors of change in established modes of governance. The identified vectors are potential verifiers of equity and socio-environmental justice criteria in governance processes that can encourage recognition of traditional fisher’s rights to deliberation on access and use of resources in these areas. On the other hand, the conclusions drawn also reveal the limits of these arrangements when considering the ambiguity of the legal regimes that outline the creation and implementation of MPAs.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

与捕鱼区重叠的海洋保护区治理模式的变化：古巴和巴西研究

本文讨论了海洋保护区（MPAs）的治理问题，特别是制定能够应对渔业领土海洋攫取过程影响的安排的可能性。通过对古巴和巴西海洋保护区经验的阐述，以及对这些区域日常治理技术科学文件、两国法律框架和同行评审文章的内容分析，本研究确定了既定治理模式的变革载体。所确定的载体是治理过程中公平和社会环境正义标准的潜在验证者，可以鼓励承认传统渔民对这些地区的资源获取和使用进行讨论的权利。另一方面，考虑到规定建立和实施海洋保护区的法律制度的模糊性，得出的结论也揭示了这些安排的局限性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Latin American Perspectives Multiple-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Latin American Perspectives is a theoretical and scholarly journal for discussion and debate on the political economy of capitalism, imperialism, and socialism in the Americas. The journal"s objective is to encourage class analysis of sociocultural realities and political strategies to transform Latin American sociopolitical structures. The journal makes a conscious effort to publish a diversity of political viewpoints, both Marxist and non-Marxist perspectives, that have influenced progressive debates in Latin America.