A dual-threshold approach for the dynamics of bi-polarization in signed networks with communities

IF 5.3 1区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Chaos Solitons & Fractals Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115735
Shuo Liu, Shuhui Guo, Huijun Zheng, Wenxuan Fu, Haoxiang Xia, Xin Lu
{"title":"A dual-threshold approach for the dynamics of bi-polarization in signed networks with communities","authors":"Shuo Liu, Shuhui Guo, Huijun Zheng, Wenxuan Fu, Haoxiang Xia, Xin Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The intensified global bi-polarization has been threatening social stability and democracy in recent years, with social networks of various forms playing a key role in shaping opinion dynamics. Understanding how individual and collective opinions form, change, and spread is crucial for mitigating bi-polarization. However, existing research rarely investigates the effects of signs on edges and their distributional characteristics among communities. This study introduces a dual-threshold opinion dynamics model in signed networks with communities to identify and analyze the impact of edge heterogeneity and its distribution on assimilation and repulsion social influences in network opinion evolution. It reveals that repulsive social influences introduced by negative edges cause assimilative social influences from positive edges to increase bi-polarization in a non-monotonic manner. The distribution of initial opinions and the tendency of intra-community node connections significantly affect the degree of bi-polarization. Different initial opinions and moderate inter-community connections can mitigate bi-polarization. Additionally, the density of positive inter-community connections has a non-monotonic effect on bi-polarization, increasing the likelihood of network consensus. This study uncovers the complex dynamics of opinion evolution, enhances understanding of how social influence and network structures shape opinion dynamics, and offers a broader perspective for effectively managing and influencing the evolution of public opinion.","PeriodicalId":9764,"journal":{"name":"Chaos Solitons & Fractals","volume":"231 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chaos Solitons & Fractals","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115735","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The intensified global bi-polarization has been threatening social stability and democracy in recent years, with social networks of various forms playing a key role in shaping opinion dynamics. Understanding how individual and collective opinions form, change, and spread is crucial for mitigating bi-polarization. However, existing research rarely investigates the effects of signs on edges and their distributional characteristics among communities. This study introduces a dual-threshold opinion dynamics model in signed networks with communities to identify and analyze the impact of edge heterogeneity and its distribution on assimilation and repulsion social influences in network opinion evolution. It reveals that repulsive social influences introduced by negative edges cause assimilative social influences from positive edges to increase bi-polarization in a non-monotonic manner. The distribution of initial opinions and the tendency of intra-community node connections significantly affect the degree of bi-polarization. Different initial opinions and moderate inter-community connections can mitigate bi-polarization. Additionally, the density of positive inter-community connections has a non-monotonic effect on bi-polarization, increasing the likelihood of network consensus. This study uncovers the complex dynamics of opinion evolution, enhances understanding of how social influence and network structures shape opinion dynamics, and offers a broader perspective for effectively managing and influencing the evolution of public opinion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带群落签名网络中双极化动态的双阈值方法
近年来,全球两极分化加剧,威胁着社会稳定和民主,各种形式的社交网络在舆论动态中发挥着关键作用。了解个人和集体意见是如何形成、变化和传播的,对于缓解两极分化至关重要。然而,现有研究很少调查标志对边缘的影响及其在社区间的分布特征。本研究在有社群的符号网络中引入了双阈值舆论动态模型,以识别和分析边缘异质性及其分布对网络舆论演化中同化和排斥性社会影响的影响。研究发现,负边缘引入的排斥性社会影响会导致正边缘的同化性社会影响以非单调的方式增加双极化。初始意见的分布和社群内节点连接的倾向对双极化程度有显著影响。不同的初始意见和适度的社群间连接可以减轻双极化。此外,社群间正向连接的密度对双极化有非单调影响,增加了网络共识的可能性。这项研究揭示了舆论演变的复杂动态,加深了人们对社会影响和网络结构如何塑造舆论动态的理解,并为有效管理和影响舆论演变提供了更广阔的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chaos Solitons & Fractals
Chaos Solitons & Fractals 物理-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
1087
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Chaos, Solitons & Fractals strives to establish itself as a premier journal in the interdisciplinary realm of Nonlinear Science, Non-equilibrium, and Complex Phenomena. It welcomes submissions covering a broad spectrum of topics within this field, including dynamics, non-equilibrium processes in physics, chemistry, and geophysics, complex matter and networks, mathematical models, computational biology, applications to quantum and mesoscopic phenomena, fluctuations and random processes, self-organization, and social phenomena.
期刊最新文献
Chemical reaction and radiation analysis for the MHD Casson nanofluid fluid flow using artificial intelligence Impact of Lévy noise on spiral waves in a lattice of Chialvo neuron map Synchronization resilience of coupled fluctuating-damping oscillators in small-world weighted complex networks Transport of the moving obstacle driven by alignment active particles Interaction of mixed localized waves in optical media with higher-order dispersion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1