Satellite observations indicate slower recovery of woody components compared to upper-canopy and leaves in tropical rainforests after drought

IF 8.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Communications Earth & Environment Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1038/s43247-024-01892-9
Yujie Dou, Feng Tian, Jean-Pierre Wigneron, Xiaojun Li, Wenmin Zhang, Yaoliang Chen, Luwei Feng, Qi Xie, Rasmus Fensholt
{"title":"Satellite observations indicate slower recovery of woody components compared to upper-canopy and leaves in tropical rainforests after drought","authors":"Yujie Dou, Feng Tian, Jean-Pierre Wigneron, Xiaojun Li, Wenmin Zhang, Yaoliang Chen, Luwei Feng, Qi Xie, Rasmus Fensholt","doi":"10.1038/s43247-024-01892-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2015–2016 El Niño-induced drought caused biomass loss in global tropical forests, yet the recovery duration of different vegetation components (woody components, upper canopies, and leaves) remains unknown. Here, we use satellite remote sensing data of vegetation optical depth and leaf area index, with varying sensitivity to different vegetation components, to examine vegetation recovery during the drought event. We find that the woody component had the slowest recovery compared to the upper canopy and leaves, and displayed greater spatial variability between continents. Key factors influencing woody recovery include drought severity, moisture-related climatic conditions (i.e., vapor pressure deficit, precipitation, and soil moisture), and seasonal variations in temperature and precipitation. Our study highlights the importance of different vegetation components for maintaining ecosystem balance under drought disturbances and indicates the need for further research to explore recovery mechanisms and the long-term impacts of drought on forest dynamics. Woody components of tropical forests have a slower recovery rate from severe drought compared to upper canopies and leaves, according to multiple remote sensing observations across the tropics during the El Niño-induced drought of 2015-2016","PeriodicalId":10530,"journal":{"name":"Communications Earth & Environment","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01892-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Earth & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01892-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2015–2016 El Niño-induced drought caused biomass loss in global tropical forests, yet the recovery duration of different vegetation components (woody components, upper canopies, and leaves) remains unknown. Here, we use satellite remote sensing data of vegetation optical depth and leaf area index, with varying sensitivity to different vegetation components, to examine vegetation recovery during the drought event. We find that the woody component had the slowest recovery compared to the upper canopy and leaves, and displayed greater spatial variability between continents. Key factors influencing woody recovery include drought severity, moisture-related climatic conditions (i.e., vapor pressure deficit, precipitation, and soil moisture), and seasonal variations in temperature and precipitation. Our study highlights the importance of different vegetation components for maintaining ecosystem balance under drought disturbances and indicates the need for further research to explore recovery mechanisms and the long-term impacts of drought on forest dynamics. Woody components of tropical forests have a slower recovery rate from severe drought compared to upper canopies and leaves, according to multiple remote sensing observations across the tropics during the El Niño-induced drought of 2015-2016

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫星观测结果表明,热带雨林干旱后木质成分的恢复速度慢于树冠上部和树叶的恢复速度
2015-2016 年厄尔尼诺引发的干旱造成全球热带森林生物量损失,但不同植被成分(木质成分、上部树冠和叶片)的恢复持续时间仍然未知。在此,我们利用卫星遥感数据植被光学深度和叶面积指数(对不同植被成分的敏感度不同)来研究干旱事件期间的植被恢复情况。我们发现,与上层冠层和叶片相比,木本植被的恢复速度最慢,而且各大洲之间的空间差异更大。影响木质部恢复的主要因素包括干旱严重程度、与水分相关的气候条件(即蒸汽压力不足、降水和土壤湿度)以及温度和降水的季节性变化。我们的研究强调了不同植被成分在干旱干扰下维持生态系统平衡的重要性,并指出需要进一步研究干旱对森林动态的恢复机制和长期影响。在2015-2016年厄尔尼诺引发的干旱期间,根据对热带地区的多次遥感观测,热带森林的木质成分与上部树冠和树叶相比,从严重干旱中恢复的速度较慢
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Communications Earth & Environment
Communications Earth & Environment Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
269
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Communications Earth & Environment is an open access journal from Nature Portfolio publishing high-quality research, reviews and commentary in all areas of the Earth, environmental and planetary sciences. Research papers published by the journal represent significant advances that bring new insight to a specialized area in Earth science, planetary science or environmental science. Communications Earth & Environment has a 2-year impact factor of 7.9 (2022 Journal Citation Reports®). Articles published in the journal in 2022 were downloaded 1,412,858 times. Median time from submission to the first editorial decision is 8 days.
期刊最新文献
Kaolinite induces rapid authigenic mineralisation in unburied shrimps. Carbon dioxide emissions from industrial processes and product use are a non-ignorable factor in China’ s mitigation eDNA offers opportunities for improved biodiversity monitoring within forest carbon markets Weakening of subsurface ocean temperature seasonality over the past four decades Mediterranean marine heatwaves intensify in the presence of concurrent atmospheric heatwaves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1