{"title":"Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Stabilization Exercises in Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Tuğba Dere, Hanife Abakay, Nazmi Saritaş, Ayşe Güç, Rabia Uğur, Fatma Eda Ekşi, Kübra Seyrek","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to investigate the effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation combined with cervical stabilization exercises on functional status, cognitive functions, and sleep quality in individuals with chronic neck pain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study involved 29 individuals (mean age 33.06 ± 14.81 years). The experimental group (n=10) received combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (2 mA/20 min) with cervical stabilization exercises, while the control group (n=10) received only cervical stabilization exercises. The sham group (n=9) received placebo Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (0 mA/20 min) with cervical stabilization exercises. Assessments were conducted before and after completing 8 weeks with 2 days per week of intervention, i.e., 16 sessions.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome measures: </strong>Pain severity was assessed using the 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire. Muscle endurance was measured by testing cervical flexors, extensors, and deep flexor muscles. Functional limitations were evaluated with the Profile Fitness Mapping neck questionnaire. Cognitive status was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and the Trail Making Test. Sleep quality was evaluated with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 16 sessions, all groups demonstrated a significant increase in cervical flexor muscle endurance (P < .05) and a significant decrease in Visual Analogue Scale pain scores at rest and at activity. Additionally, the experimental group exhibited a significant improvement in Visual Analogue Scale with activity, Profile Fitness Mapping neck questionnaire, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores. No significant difference was found between the groups in cognitive function or sleep quality (P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The importance of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation combined with cervical stabilization exercises as a tool for pain management and rehabilitation of impaired motor control in cervical muscles in individuals with chronic neck pain is emphasized. It is suggested that combined approaches are considered instead of cervical stabilization exercises alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":" ","pages":"36-44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The study aimed to investigate the effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation combined with cervical stabilization exercises on functional status, cognitive functions, and sleep quality in individuals with chronic neck pain.
Materials and methods: The study involved 29 individuals (mean age 33.06 ± 14.81 years). The experimental group (n=10) received combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (2 mA/20 min) with cervical stabilization exercises, while the control group (n=10) received only cervical stabilization exercises. The sham group (n=9) received placebo Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (0 mA/20 min) with cervical stabilization exercises. Assessments were conducted before and after completing 8 weeks with 2 days per week of intervention, i.e., 16 sessions.
Primary outcome measures: Pain severity was assessed using the 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire. Muscle endurance was measured by testing cervical flexors, extensors, and deep flexor muscles. Functional limitations were evaluated with the Profile Fitness Mapping neck questionnaire. Cognitive status was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and the Trail Making Test. Sleep quality was evaluated with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.
Results: After 16 sessions, all groups demonstrated a significant increase in cervical flexor muscle endurance (P < .05) and a significant decrease in Visual Analogue Scale pain scores at rest and at activity. Additionally, the experimental group exhibited a significant improvement in Visual Analogue Scale with activity, Profile Fitness Mapping neck questionnaire, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores. No significant difference was found between the groups in cognitive function or sleep quality (P > .05).
Conclusion: The importance of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation combined with cervical stabilization exercises as a tool for pain management and rehabilitation of impaired motor control in cervical muscles in individuals with chronic neck pain is emphasized. It is suggested that combined approaches are considered instead of cervical stabilization exercises alone.
期刊介绍:
Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field.
Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.