Distinct connectivity patterns between perception and attention-related brain networks characterize dyslexia: Machine learning applied to resting-state fMRI.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Cortex Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2024.08.012
Nikolay Taran, Rotem Gatenyo, Emmanuelle Hadjadj, Rola Farah, Tzipi Horowitz-Kraus
{"title":"Distinct connectivity patterns between perception and attention-related brain networks characterize dyslexia: Machine learning applied to resting-state fMRI.","authors":"Nikolay Taran, Rotem Gatenyo, Emmanuelle Hadjadj, Rola Farah, Tzipi Horowitz-Kraus","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diagnosis of dyslexia often occurs in late schooling years, leading to academic and psychological challenges. Furthermore, diagnosis is time-consuming, costly, and reliant on arbitrary cutoffs. On the other hand, automated algorithms hold great potential in medical and psychological diagnostics. The aim of the present study was to develop a machine learning tool for the detection of dyslexia in children based on the intrinsic connectivity patterns of different brain networks underlying perception and attention. Here, 117 children (8-12 years old; 58 females; 52 typical readers; TR and 65 children with dyslexia) completed cognitive and reading assessments and underwent 10 min of resting-state fMRI. Functional connectivity coefficients between 264 brain regions were used as features for machine learning. Different supervised algorithms were employed for classification of children with and without dyslexia. A classifier trained on dorsal attention network features exhibited the highest performance (accuracy .79, sensitivity .92, specificity .64). Auditory, visual, and fronto-parietal network-based classification showed intermediate accuracy levels (70-75%). These results highlight significant neurobiological differences in brain networks associated with visual attention between TR and children with dyslexia. Distinct neural integration patterns can differentiate dyslexia from typical development, which may be utilized in the future as a biomarker for the presence and/or severity of dyslexia.</p>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"181 ","pages":"216-232"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cortex","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2024.08.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diagnosis of dyslexia often occurs in late schooling years, leading to academic and psychological challenges. Furthermore, diagnosis is time-consuming, costly, and reliant on arbitrary cutoffs. On the other hand, automated algorithms hold great potential in medical and psychological diagnostics. The aim of the present study was to develop a machine learning tool for the detection of dyslexia in children based on the intrinsic connectivity patterns of different brain networks underlying perception and attention. Here, 117 children (8-12 years old; 58 females; 52 typical readers; TR and 65 children with dyslexia) completed cognitive and reading assessments and underwent 10 min of resting-state fMRI. Functional connectivity coefficients between 264 brain regions were used as features for machine learning. Different supervised algorithms were employed for classification of children with and without dyslexia. A classifier trained on dorsal attention network features exhibited the highest performance (accuracy .79, sensitivity .92, specificity .64). Auditory, visual, and fronto-parietal network-based classification showed intermediate accuracy levels (70-75%). These results highlight significant neurobiological differences in brain networks associated with visual attention between TR and children with dyslexia. Distinct neural integration patterns can differentiate dyslexia from typical development, which may be utilized in the future as a biomarker for the presence and/or severity of dyslexia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感知和注意力相关大脑网络之间不同的连接模式是阅读障碍的特征:将机器学习应用于静息态 fMRI。
诵读困难的诊断往往发生在学龄后期,从而导致学业和心理方面的挑战。此外,诊断耗时长、成本高,而且依赖于任意的临界值。另一方面,自动算法在医疗和心理诊断方面具有巨大潜力。本研究旨在开发一种机器学习工具,根据感知和注意力基础的不同大脑网络的内在连接模式来检测儿童的阅读障碍。在本研究中,117 名儿童(8-12 岁;58 名女性;52 名典型阅读者;TR 和 65 名阅读障碍儿童)完成了认知和阅读评估,并接受了 10 分钟的静息态 fMRI 检查。264 个脑区之间的功能连接系数被用作机器学习的特征。采用不同的监督算法对存在和不存在阅读障碍的儿童进行分类。根据背侧注意力网络特征训练的分类器表现出最高的性能(准确率为 0.79,灵敏度为 0.92,特异性为 0.64)。基于听觉、视觉和前顶叶网络的分类表现出中等准确率水平(70-75%)。这些结果凸显了与视觉注意力相关的大脑网络在诵读困难儿童和TR儿童之间存在着明显的神经生物学差异。不同的神经整合模式可将阅读障碍与典型的发育障碍区分开来,这在未来可用作阅读障碍存在和/或严重程度的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cortex
Cortex 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
250
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: CORTEX is an international journal devoted to the study of cognition and of the relationship between the nervous system and mental processes, particularly as these are reflected in the behaviour of patients with acquired brain lesions, normal volunteers, children with typical and atypical development, and in the activation of brain regions and systems as recorded by functional neuroimaging techniques. It was founded in 1964 by Ennio De Renzi.
期刊最新文献
Shared body representation constraints in human and non-human primates behavior Exploring the development of past and future episodic memory in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: A preliminary longitudinal study Distinct connectivity patterns between perception and attention-related brain networks characterize dyslexia: Machine learning applied to resting-state fMRI. Do total hippocampus and hippocampal subfield volumes relate to navigation ability? A call towards methodological consistency. Vertical neglect towards the lower space after bilateral parietal strokes – A case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1