Factors Associated With Psychotherapist and Psychiatrist Participation in Public Insurance: Evidence From Georgia State.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Care Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002099
Daniel Tadmon, Yihe Nina Gao
{"title":"Factors Associated With Psychotherapist and Psychiatrist Participation in Public Insurance: Evidence From Georgia State.","authors":"Daniel Tadmon, Yihe Nina Gao","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate rates of public insurance participation among the different psychotherapist professions as well as among psychiatrists. In addition, it seeks to assess individual and contextual factors that are associated with public insurance participation.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Historically, Medicaid- and Medicare-insured individuals have faced unique barriers to access to mental health professionals. Because prior literature has focused on psychiatrists, little is currently known of public insurance participation rates among psychotherapists-even though they constitute the bulk of the mental health workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of Medicaid and Medicare participation among a census of all Georgia psychologists, licensed clinical social workers, licensed professional counselors, marriage and family therapists, as well as psychiatrists, using their complete licensing rosters as of November 2023 (N = 21,260).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings show that 82.7% of psychotherapists did not accept any public insurance. This rate was 58.8% among psychiatrists. Among Georgia-licensed clinicians located outside of the state, likely to practice through telehealth, insurance acceptance was substantially lower than their in-state peers', suggesting that telehealth may have limited reach among publicly-insured patients. Psychotherapists' different professions, as well as factors such as urbanicity, hospital setting, practice size, and individual tenure length, were strongly associated with the likelihood of insurance participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychotherapists' low rates of participation in public insurance programs and meaningful variation between professions underscore that policies to better Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries' access to mental health treatment must consider psychotherapists' unique practice patterns and implement interventions informed by them.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002099","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate rates of public insurance participation among the different psychotherapist professions as well as among psychiatrists. In addition, it seeks to assess individual and contextual factors that are associated with public insurance participation.

Background: Historically, Medicaid- and Medicare-insured individuals have faced unique barriers to access to mental health professionals. Because prior literature has focused on psychiatrists, little is currently known of public insurance participation rates among psychotherapists-even though they constitute the bulk of the mental health workforce.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of Medicaid and Medicare participation among a census of all Georgia psychologists, licensed clinical social workers, licensed professional counselors, marriage and family therapists, as well as psychiatrists, using their complete licensing rosters as of November 2023 (N = 21,260).

Results: Findings show that 82.7% of psychotherapists did not accept any public insurance. This rate was 58.8% among psychiatrists. Among Georgia-licensed clinicians located outside of the state, likely to practice through telehealth, insurance acceptance was substantially lower than their in-state peers', suggesting that telehealth may have limited reach among publicly-insured patients. Psychotherapists' different professions, as well as factors such as urbanicity, hospital setting, practice size, and individual tenure length, were strongly associated with the likelihood of insurance participation.

Conclusion: Psychotherapists' low rates of participation in public insurance programs and meaningful variation between professions underscore that policies to better Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries' access to mental health treatment must consider psychotherapists' unique practice patterns and implement interventions informed by them.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理治疗师和精神科医生参与公共保险的相关因素:佐治亚州的证据
研究目的本研究旨在评估不同心理治疗师职业以及精神科医生的公共保险参与率。此外,本研究还试图评估与参加公共保险相关的个人因素和环境因素:背景:从历史上看,医疗补助和医疗保险的参保者在接触心理健康专业人员方面面临着独特的障碍。由于之前的文献主要关注精神科医生,目前对心理治疗师的公共保险参与率知之甚少--尽管他们构成了心理健康工作队伍的主体:方法:对佐治亚州所有心理学家、持证临床社会工作者、持证专业咨询师、婚姻和家庭治疗师以及精神科医生进行普查,使用截至 2023 年 11 月的完整执照名册(N = 21,260 人),对他们参与医疗补助和医疗保险的情况进行回顾性分析:结果显示,82.7% 的心理治疗师不接受任何公共保险。精神科医生的这一比例为 58.8%。在佐治亚州以外地区获得执照的临床医生中,可能会通过远程医疗执业,他们对保险的接受程度远远低于州内同行,这表明远程医疗在公共保险患者中的覆盖范围可能有限。心理治疗师的不同职业以及城市化程度、医院环境、诊所规模和个人任期长短等因素与参与保险的可能性密切相关:心理治疗师在公共保险项目中的参与率较低,且不同职业之间存在显著差异,这突出表明,要改善医疗补助计划和医疗保险计划受益人获得心理健康治疗的机会,就必须考虑心理治疗师独特的执业模式,并在此基础上实施干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
期刊最新文献
Differences in Exposures to Adverse Childhood Experiences by Primary Source of Health Care, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2019-2020. Health Care Access and COVID-19 Vaccination in the United States: Comment. Health Care Workers' Perspectives on Collecting Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the Adult Primary Care Setting. Reply to Comments on Health Care Access and COVID-19 Vaccination in the United States. Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding Our Paper, "Patient-Centered Innovation: Involving Patients in Open Social Innovation".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1